Advertisement

Monitoring the pollution effects from a gold tailing storage facility on adjacent land through Landscape Function Analysis

  • Angelique DaniellEmail author
  • Dawid S. Malo
  • Pieter W. van Deventer
Original Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Degraded landscapes adjacent to gold tailing storage facilities (TSFs) typically suffer from loss of ecosystem function as a result of seepage pollution. Restoration of these areas has become a primary concern in the fields of environmental science and management within recent decades. To assess the extent of land degradation, detailed monitoring of pollution took place over a period of 4 years on farmland adjacent to a gold TSF in South Africa. The Landscape Function Analysis (LFA) monitoring procedure was developed by David Tongway for the Australian rangelands, and has been utilised in this investigation to assess the impact of seepage pollution on the soil within the aforementioned farmland area. This paper indicated that the LFA procedure could not accurately present landscape stability and ecosystem functionality at the seepage-polluted sites within the short monitoring period presented in this study. It was established that no adverse effects on the natural vegetation were apparent, other than encroachment by Seriphium plumosum, which affected the grazing quality of the area but contributed significantly to the LFA values.

Keywords

Dysfunctional Ecosystem function Functional Limitations Seepage pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This investigation was supported financially by Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme, National Research Fund, Mine Waste Solutions and AngloGold Ashanti (South Africa).

References

  1. Adobe Systems Incorporated (2008) Adobe Photoshop CS4. Adobe Systems IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avenant P (2015) Report on the National Bankrupt bush (Seriphium plumosum) survey (2010-2012). Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries, Directorate Land Use & Soil Management, Sub-directorate: Natural Resources Inventories & Assessments, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastin GN, Ludwig JA, Eager RW, Chewings VH, Liedhoff AC (2002) Indicators of landscape function: comparing patchiness metrics using remotely-sensed data from rangelands. Ecol Ind 1:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corel Corporation (2005) CorelDRAW X3 Version 13. Corel Corporation&#169Google Scholar
  5. Daniell A (2015) Geochemical monitoring of soil pollution from the MWS-5 gold tailings facility on the Farm Stilfontein. Dissertation, North West University PotchefstroomGoogle Scholar
  6. Erskine PD, Fletcher AT, Seaborn B (2013) Opportunities and constraints of functional assessment of mined land rehabilitation. In Tibbett M, Fourie, Digby C (eds) Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 345–354Google Scholar
  7. Free Software Foundation Incorporated (1991) Inkskape version 0.91. GNU Public LicenceGoogle Scholar
  8. Google E (2013) Mine Waste Solutions Tailings Complex 26º48′24.05′’S, 26º47′14.45′’E, elevation 1351 m and Imagery Date 10/10/2013. http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Accessed 5 May 2013
  9. Haagner ASH (2008) The role of vegetation in characterising landscape function on rehabilitating gold tailings. Dissertation, North West University PotchefstroomGoogle Scholar
  10. Haagner ASH, Kellner K, Tongway DJ (2008) Enhancing Traditional rehabilitation monitoring in South Africa by adding landscape function characteristics. In: Fourie AB, Tibbett M, Weiersbye IM, Dye PJ (eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 809–820Google Scholar
  11. Humphries RN (2016) Extended ecosystem function analysis—the next step for mine rehabilitation appraisals. In: Fourie AB, Tibbett M (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  12. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Ludwig JA, Eager RW, Bastin GN, Chewings VH, Liedloff AC (2002) A leakiness index for assessing landscape function using remote-sensing. Landscape Ecol 17:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malo DS (2012) The effect of seepage pollution from gold mine tailings on vegetation change. Mini-Dissertation, North West University PotchefstroomGoogle Scholar
  15. Microsoft Corporation (2010) Microsoft® Office Excel® 2010. Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010Google Scholar
  16. Moore A, Van Niekerk JP (1987) Bosindringing in the Vrystaatstreek: Indringerspesies en die omvang van die probleem. Glen Agric 16:15–18Google Scholar
  17. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  18. Nasrabadi T, Bidhendi GN, Karbassi AR, Hoveidi H, Nasrabadi I, Pezeshk H, Rashidinejad F (2009) Influence of Sungun copper mine on groundwater quality. NW Iran Environ Geol 58(4):693–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seiderer M (2011) Evaluation of rehabilitation attempts at Harties No. 7 TDF 11 years on: The effect of slope flattening and topsoil additions. Mini-Dissertation, North West University PotchefstroomGoogle Scholar
  20. Snyman HA (2009) Germination potential of Seriphium plumosum (bankrupt bush, slangbos or vaalbos). Grassroots 9(1):43–48Google Scholar
  21. StatSoft (2014) SATISTICA 13.3. StatSoft Incorporation Version 13.3Google Scholar
  22. Steenekamp SJ, Haagner ASH (2010) Impacts of pollution plume emanating from Chemwes TD5 on vegetation and grazing capacity on the farm Stilfontein. Agreenco environmental projects, Stilfontein (unpublished)Google Scholar
  23. Tainton NM (1999) The ecology of the main grazing lands of South Africa: the Savanna Biome. In: Tainton NM (ed) Veld management in South Africa. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg (Chap. 2)Google Scholar
  24. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. The Non-Affiliated Soil Analysis Work Committee (1990) Handbook of standard soil testing methods for advisory purposes. Soil Science Society of South Africa, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  26. Tongway DJ, Hindley NL (2000) Ecosystem function analysis of rangeland monitoring data: rangelands audit project 1.1. National Land and Water Resources Audit, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  27. Tongway DJ, Hindley NL (2003) Indicators of ecosystem rehabilitation: success. Stage two—verification of EFA indicators. Final Report, CSIRO, Australia, pp 10–11Google Scholar
  28. Tongway DJ, Hindley NL (2004) landscape function analysis: procedures for monitoring and assessing landscape with special reference to mine sites and rangelands. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  29. Tongway DJ, Ludwig JA (2011) Restoring disturbed landscapes: putting principles into practice. Island press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Deventer PW (2011a) Environmental geology of stilfontein gold mine. Forum Geoökol 22(3):22–27Google Scholar
  31. Van Deventer PW (2011b) Investigation into potential soil pollution from the Chemwes No. 5 TDF on the Farm Stilfontein. Potchefstroom (unpublished)Google Scholar
  32. Van der Walt L, Cilliers SS, Kellner K, Tongway D, van Rensburg L (2012) Landscape functionality of plan communities in the Impala Platinum mining area, Rustenburg. J Environ Manag 113:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiersbye IM, Witkowski ETF, Reichardt M (2006) Floristic composition of gold and uranium tailings dams, and adjacent polluted areas, on South Africa’s deep-level mines. Bothalia 36:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wepener J, Kellner K, Jordaan D (2008) The control of Seriphium plumosum encroachment in certain areas of the grassland biome in the North-West Province. Proceedings of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa, 43:88–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for Environmental Science and ManagementNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa
  2. 2.Agreenco BioEngineeringPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations