Advertisement

Spatial and seasonal variability of the water quality characteristics of a river in Northeast Brazil

  • Marcus Aurélio Soares CruzEmail author
  • Amanda de Azevedo Gonçalves
  • Ricardo de Aragão
  • Julio Roberto Araujo de Amorim
  • Paulo Vinicius Melo da Mota
  • Vajapeyan S. Srinivasan
  • Carlos Alexandre Borges Garcia
  • Eduardo Eneas de Figueiredo
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

This study is aimed to evaluate the influence of land use/land cover as well as the seasonality on the variability of water quality in the Siriri River basin, in the State of Sergipe, Brazil. The following parameters were monitored: temperature (Temp), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), total nitrogen (TN), nitrate as N (NO3-N), total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), total dissolved solids (TDS), turbidity (Turb), thermotolerant coliforms (TCol), water level (WL), total agricultural area (AGR), total pasture area (PAS), total precipitation in 1 day (Pr1d), 10 days (Pr10d), and 30 days (Pr30d) prior to water sampling date. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA)/factor analysis (FA) were utilized to evaluate the data. The results indicate the predominance of organic and biological pollutants in the Siriri River basin, which are related to agricultural activities and urban sewage, mainly in the wet periods. The ANOVA indicates significant influence of locality on pH, EC, TDS, DO, TCol, Chl-a, Turb, TN, TP, and WL. Seasonality factor has a significant influence on Temp, NO3-N, Chl-a, Turb, TN, TP, Pr1d, Pr10d, and Pr30d. The PCA highlights the influence of agricultural activities in component 1 (PC1), explaining 26% of the variance of the river water quality in the watershed.

Keywords

Water resources Land use/land cover Multivariate statistics Principal components analysis Siriri River basin 

Notes

References

  1. Álvarez-Cabria M, Barquín J, Peñas FJ (2016) Modelling the spatial and seasonal variability of water quality for entire river networks: Relationships with natural and anthropogenic factors. Sci Total Environ 545:152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragão R, Almeida JAP, Figueiredo EE, Srinivasan VS (2013) Mapping the laminar erosion potential for the Japaratuba River Basin, SE, via GIS. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 15(7):731–740 (in Portuguese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blasi JIP di, Torres JM, Nieto PJG, Fernández JRA (2013) Analysis and detection of outliers in quater quality parameters from different automated monitoring stations in the Miño River basin (NW Spain). Ecol Eng 60:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bortoletto EC, Silva HA, Bonifácio CM, Tavares CRG (2015) Water quality monitoring of the Pirapó River watershed, Paraná, Brazil. Braz J Biol 75(4):725–735Google Scholar
  5. BRAZIL (2005) CONAMA - Brazilian National Environmental Council, Resolution n° 357/2005. Accounts for classification of water bodies and environment guideline for the framework as well as states the conditions and standards to sewage disposal and other providences (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  6. Calijuri ML, Castro JS, Costa LS, Assemany PP, Alves JEM (2015) Impact of land use/land cover changes on water quality and hydrological behavior of an agricultural subwatershed. Environ Earth Sci 74(6):5373–5382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho KQ, Lima SB, Passig FH, Gusmão LK, Souza DC, Kreutz C et al (2015) Influence of urban area on the water quality of the Campo River basin, Paraná State, Brazil. Braz J Biol 75(4):1020–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Lu J (2014) Effects of land use, topography and socio-economic factors on river water quality in a mountainous watershed with intensive agricultural production in east China. PLoS One 9(8):1–12Google Scholar
  9. Cukrov N, Tepic N, Omanović D, Logen S, Bura-Nakić S, Vojvodic V, Pizela I (2012) Qualitative interpretation of physico-chemical and isotopic parameters in the Krka River (Croatia) assessed by multivariate statistical analysis. Int J Environ Anal Chem 92(10):1187–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng Z, Zhang X, Li D, Pan G (2015) Simulation of land use/land cover change and its effects on the hydrological characteristics of the upper reaches of the Hanjiang Basin. Environ Earth Sci 73(3):1119–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey S, Uddin MS, Manchur MA (2017) Physicochemical and bacteriological assessment of surface water quality of the Karnaphuli River in Bangladesh. J Pure Appl Microbiol 11(4):1721–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding J, Jiang Y, Fu L, Liu Q, Peng Q, Kang M (2015) Impacts of land use on surface water quality in a subtropical river basin: a case study of the Dongjiang River basin, Southeastern China. Water 7(8):4427–4445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doherty JM, Miller JF, Prellwitz SG, Thompson AM, Loheide SP, Zedler JB (2014) Hydrologic regimes revealed bundles and tradeoffs among six wetland services. Ecosystems 17(6):1026–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giri S, Qiu Z (2016) Understanding the relationship of land uses and water quality in twenty first century: a review. J Environ Manag 173:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In: Jolliffe IT (ed) Principal component analysis, 2nd. edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 151–166Google Scholar
  16. Kazi TG, Arain MB, Jamali MK, Jalbani N, Afridi HI, Sarfraz RA, Baig JA, Shah AQ (2009) Assessment of water quality of polluted lake using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(2):301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li P, Qian H, Wu J, Zhang Y, Zhang H (2013) Major ion chemistry of shallow groundwater in the Dongsheng Coalfield, Ordos Basin, China. Mine Water Environ 32(3):195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-013-0234-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li H, Ma Y, Liu W (2016) Land use and topography as predictors of nitrogen levels in tropical catchments in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li P, Tian R, Xue C, Wu J (2017a) Progress, opportunities and key fields for groundwater quality research under the impacts of human activities in China with a special focus on western China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(15):13224–13234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8753-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li P, Feng W, Xue C, Tian R, Wang S (2017b) Spatiotemporal variability of contaminants in lake water and their risks to human health: a case study of the Shahu Lake tourist area, northwest China. Expo Health 9(3):213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0237-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li P, Tian R, Liu R (2018) Solute geochemistry and multivariate analysis of water quality in the Guohua phosphorite mine, Guizhou Province, China. Exposure Health.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-018-0277-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu C-W, Lin K-H, Kuo Y-M (2003) Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 313(1–3):77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. López-López JA, García-Vargas M, Moreno C (2011) A chemometric approach to the evaluation of atmospheric and fluvial pollutant inputs in aquatic systems: the Guadalquivir River estuary as a case study. Environ Pollut 159(5):1136–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madruga FV, Reis FAGV, Medeiros GA, Giordano LC (2008) Evaluation of the influence of Macacos stream in the water quality of Mogi Guaçu River, in the county of Mogi Guaçu, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Eng Ambient 5(2):152–168 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  25. Melo Neto JO, Chagas RM, Méllo AVJ (2013) Delineation of potential areas of groundwater recharge in the Siriri River basin, State of Sergipe, Brazil. Sci Plena 9(7):1–10 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  26. Mustapha A, Aris AZ, Juahir H, Ramli MF, Kura NU (2013) River water quality assessment using environmentric techniques: case study of Jakara River basin. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(8):5630–5644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogwueleka TC (2015) Use of multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of temporal and spatial variations in water quality of the Kaduna River, Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess 187(3):137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pandiarajan S, Kumaran SS, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Saravanan R (2016) Interfacial microstructure and optimization of friction welding by Taguchi and ANOVA method on SA 213 tube to SA 387 tube plate without backing block using an external tool. J Alloys Compd 654:534–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Passig FH, Lima SB, Carvalho KQ, Halmeman MCR, Souza PC, Gusmão LK (2015) Monitoring of urban and rural basins: water quality of Mourão basin. Braz J Biol 75(4):158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statisctical computing. version 3.2.2. R Foundation for statistical computing. Viena, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 25 Feb 2016
  31. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (eds) (2012) Standards methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Santana LM, Moraes MEB, Silva DML, Ferragut C (2016) Spatial and temporal variation of phytoplankton in a tropical eutrophic river. Braz J Biol 76(3):600–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schilling KE, Kim S-W, Jones CS (2017) Use of water quality surrogates to estimate total phosphorus concentrations in Iowa rivers. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silva MAM, Souza MFL, Abreu PC (2015) Spatial and temporal variation of dissolved inorganic nutrients, and Chlorophyll-α in a tropical estuary in Northeastern Brazil: dynamics of nutrient removal. Braz J Oceanogr 63(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh KP, Malik A, Sinha S (2005) Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti River (India) using multivariate statistical techniques—a case study. Anal Chim Acta 38(1–2):355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vadde KK, Wang J, Cao L, Yuan T, McCarthy AJ, Sekar R (2018) Assessment of water quality and identification of pollution risk locations in Tiaoxi River. Water 10(2):183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Villa A, Djodjic F, Bergstrom L (2014) Soil dispersion tests combined with topographical information can describe field-scale sediment and phosphorus losses. Soil Use Manag 30(3):342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang Y, Wang P, Bai Y, Tian Z, Li J, Shao X, Mustavich LF, Li BL (2013) Assessment of surface water quality via multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Songhua River Harbbin region, China. J Hydro-Environ Res 7(1):30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Q, Wu X, Zhao B, Qin J, Peng T (2015) Combined multivariate statistical techniques, water pollution index (WPI) and Daniel trend test methods to evaluate temporal and spatial variations and trends of water quality at Shanchong River in the Northwest Basin of Lake Fuxian, China. PLoS One 10(4):1–17Google Scholar
  40. Wigington PJ, DeWalle DR, Murdoch PS, Kretser WA, Simonin HA, Van Sickle J, Baker JP (1996) Episodic acidification of small streams in the northeastern United States: ionic controls of episodes. Ecol Appl 6(2):389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yongqiu X, Chaopu T, Dongli S, Xiaoyuan Y (2016) Linking river nutrient concentrations to land use and rainfall in a paddy agriculture—urban area gradient watershed in southeast China. Sci Total Environ 566–567:1094–1105Google Scholar
  42. Zhao Y, Xia XH, Yang ZF, Wang F (2012) Assessment of water quality in Baiyangdian Lake using multivariate statistical techniques. Proc Environ Sci 13:1213–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Aurélio Soares Cruz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanda de Azevedo Gonçalves
    • 2
  • Ricardo de Aragão
    • 3
  • Julio Roberto Araujo de Amorim
    • 1
  • Paulo Vinicius Melo da Mota
    • 1
  • Vajapeyan S. Srinivasan
    • 3
  • Carlos Alexandre Borges Garcia
    • 2
  • Eduardo Eneas de Figueiredo
    • 3
  1. 1.Embrapa Tabuleiros CosteirosAracajuBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal de SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  3. 3.Universidade Federal de Campina GrandeCampina GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations