Advertisement

Hydraulic analysis for strategic management of flood risks along the Illinois River

  • Lina Wang
  • Yanqing LianEmail author
  • Zheng Li
Thematic Issue
  • 40 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Climate Effects on Water Resources

Abstract

Causes of flooding in the Illinois River were due to heavy rains in the Illinois River Basin or the backwater effect from the Mississippi River, but most often due to flooding from the Illinois River Basin combined with the raised water level in the Mississippi River at Grafton. During the 2013 flood, two of The Nature Conservancy ecosystem restoration levee and drainage districts (Spunky Bottoms and Emiquon) were flooded by levee breach and overtopping, respectively. Simulation for levee breach at the Spunky Bottom LDD (levee and drainage district) indicated that the water surface elevation at the breach location in the Illinois River was around 446 ft and levee breach elevation started at around 445 ft, which was consistent with the field data. The impact to flood peak reduction using a single LDD as flow diversion storage has been analyzed for the 50- and 100-year frequency floods on the Lower Illinois River to provide information for strategic management of LDD for flood risk reduction. Thousands of UNET model simulations have been performed for this analysis. This study showed that the maximum flood stage reduction can be provided using a single LDD in the La Grange Pool are mostly less than 0.1 m for both the 50 and 100-year floods. LDDs in the Alton Pool below the La Grange L&D can provide more flood stage reduction. The reductions from the Scott County and the Big Swan LDDs can be as high as 1 m. Although LDDs below hillview can provide even higher stage reduction, LDDs would have been flooded by the 50 and 100-year floods thus would not have much impact as flood diversion storages. This study has shown floodplain storages can be used to reduce flood peaks. However, the effectiveness of each storage area needs to be strategically managed to achieve the best solution, due to the dynamic features of flooding conditions.

Keywords

Flooding Levee breach Strategic management of floodplain Hydraulic modeling 

Notes

References

  1. Akanbi AA, Singh KP (1997) Managed flood storage option for selected levees along the lower Illinois River for enhancing flood protection, agriculture, wetlands, and recreation. Second Report: Validation of the UNET model for the lower Illinois River. Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 608Google Scholar
  2. Akanbi AA, Lian YQ, Soong TW (1999) An analysis on managed flood storage options for selected levees along the lower Illinois River for enhancing flood protection. Report no 4: Flood Storage Reservoirs and Flooding on the Lower Illinois River. Illinois State Water Survey. Contract Report 645, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvord JW, Burdick CB (1915) Report of the rivers and lakes commission on the Illinois River and its bottomlands, with reference to the conservation of agriculture and fisheries and the control of floods. Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkau W (1995) UNET, Unsteady flow through a network of open channels and lakes. Short course at Rock Island District, Corps of Engineers, April 29–May 3, 1995Google Scholar
  5. Call BC, Belmont P, Schmidt JC, Wilcock PR (2017) Changes in floodplain inundation under nonstationary hydrology for an adjustable, alluvial river channel. Water Resour Res 53(5):3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cid A, Menéndez M, Castanedo S, Abascal AJ, Méndez FJ, Medina R (2016) Long-term changes in the frequency, intensity and duration of extreme storm surge events in southern europe. Clim Dyn 46(5–6):1503–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Debele SE, Strupczewski WG, Bogdanowicz E (2017) A comparison of three approaches to non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Acta Geophys 65(4):863–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1987) National flood insurance program and related regulations. FEMA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall BR (1991) Impact of agricultural levees on flood hazards. Department of the Army, Waterway Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, 309 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MSGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard LJ, Anderson IA, Underwood KL, Dewoolkar MM, Deschaine LM, Rizzo DM (2016) Heuristic assessment of bridge scour sensitivity using differential evolution: case study for linking floodplain encroachment and bridge scour. Environ Syst Res 5(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Illinois State Planning Commission (1940) Report on the lower Illinois River Basin, and contiguous area draining directly into the Mississippi River. In: Revised edition of the report prepared for the National Water Resources Survey of the National Resources Committee in 1936–1937. Illinois State Planning Commission, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai C, Schaffranek RW, Baltzer RA (1991) Frictional resistance treatment in unsteady open-channel flow simulation. In: Yen B (ed) Channel flow resistance: centennial of Manning’s formula. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, pp 409–420Google Scholar
  13. Lian Y, Soong D, Demissie M, Clark G, Dalton R (2001) Modeling of the lower illinois river with managed flood storage options for flood protection. XXIX IAHR biennial congress proceedings, September 16–21, 2001, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  14. Lian YQ, Demissie M, Choi H, Blanco A (2003) Optimal spillway dimensions for flood stage reduction in the lower Illinois River with the UNET model. In: World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, 2003, Philadelphia, June 23–26Google Scholar
  15. Lian Y, Chan I, Xie H, Demissie M (2010) Improving hspf modeling accuracy from ftables. J Hydrol Eng 15(8):642–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macvean LJ, Thompson SE, Sivapalan M, Hutton P (2016) Water cycle implications of agriculture and flood control infrastructure in the San Francisco Bay-Delta System. AGU Fall Meeting. AGU Fall Meeting AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  17. Mcaneney J, Robin VDH, Yeo S (2017) Stationarity of major flood frequencies and heights on the Ba River, Fiji, over a 122-year record. Int J Climatol 37:171Google Scholar
  18. Morrison RR, Bray E, Nardi F, Annis A, Dong Q (2017) Spatial relationships of levees and wetland systems within floodplains of the Wabash Basin, USA. J Am Water Resour Assoc 54(4):934–948.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulahasan S, Stoesser T (2017) Flow resistance of in-line vegetation in open channel flow. Int J River Basin Manag 15:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh KP (1996) Managed flood storage option for selected levees along the lower Illinois River for enhancing flood protection, agriculture, wetlands, and recreation. First report: Stage and flood frequencies and the Mississippi backwater effects. Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 590Google Scholar
  21. Singh KP, Ramamurthy GS (1990) Changes in climate and hydrology of the Illinois River Basin and what they portend for Levee Districts and Peoria Lake. In: Proceedings, American Water Resources Association Conference, Peoria, IL, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  22. Thompson J (1989) Case studies in drainage and levee district formation and development on the floodplain of the Lower Illinois River, 1890s to 1930s. University of Illinois Water Resources Center Special Report 17, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  23. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1994) The great flood of 1993, post-flood report. Upper Mississippi River and Lower Missouri River Basins; Appendix C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  24. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1997) UNET Version 3.2. One-dimensional unsteady flow through a full network of open channels. Water Resources Support Center, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. Davis, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2004) Upper Mississippi river system flow frequency study. https://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/Portals/48/docs/FRM/UpperMissFlowFreq/App.%20E%20Kansas%20City%20Dist.%20Hydrology_Hydraulics.pdf
  26. Wobus CW, Gutmann ED, Jones R, Rissing M, Mizukami N, Lorie M et al (2017) Modeled changes in 100 year flood risk and asset damages within mapped floodplains of the contiguous United States. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GeographySouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  3. 3.Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  4. 4.Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations