A small-scale map analysis of the engineering-geological zone and landscape element dependencies for the land-use planning purposes in the Czech Republic

  • Marian Marschalko
  • Isik YilmazEmail author
  • David Krčmář
  • Xianfeng Cheng
  • Jan Kubáč
  • Petr Kycl
Original Article


The aim of the article is to describe the connections among the engineering-geological zones and landscape elements on the level of a small-scale map analysis of a whole country. Next, it also brings quantified spatial information on the distribution of the different engineering-geological zones in the Czech Republic (CR) in relation to landscape elements as such information is strategic for engineering, agricultural, and forestry activities of different countries. The information is crucial for scientists and land-use planners, including the limiting conditions of the distribution of certain geological environments within a country, which helps to calibrate the activities and adjust to the environments. This study reports the results of an overlay analysis of engineering-geological zones of the Czech Republic and of landscape elements (Corine). However, the major aim was not the overlay analysis itself, but an analysis of the obtained information from the whole-country perspective. Existing GIS database of engineering-geological zoning maps and CORINE Land Cover for Czech Republic in Arc/INFO GIS format was used to be data source. All data were available as polygons. For data combination, we have used GIS tool Intersection, by which we have combined data from two data layers. Resulting layer and its database were then processed; areal extent and percentage for every class were calculated. The quantification is strategic for researchers, land-use planners, developers, and designers as they may pay better attention to the most widespread engineering-geological environments in a country, and thus possibly eliminate damage arising from identical attention being paid to all geological environments. Each country should pay attention to their geological environments based on spatial distribution, and in relation to the landscape element percentages.


Engineering-geological zones Landscape elements Overlay analysis Quantification of relations National land-use planning needs 



The authors would like to thank VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava for the support within the project SP2017/22. Authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for very constructive suggestions and critics which led to the improvement of the article.


  1. Assine ML (2005) River avulsions on the Taquari megafan, Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Geomorphology 70(3):357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett PJ, Singhroy VH, Shirota J, Leney SJ (2004) Methods for remote engineering geology terrain analysis in boreal forest regions of Ontario, Canada. Environ Eng Geosci 10(3):229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciugudean-Toma VIO, R. I. C. A, Stefanescu I (2006) Engineering geology of the Bucharest city area, Romania. IAEG-2006, Engineering Geology for Tomorrow’s Cities, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  4. de Maynadier PG, Hunter ML Jr (2000) Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Nat Areas J 20(1):56–65Google Scholar
  5. Field EH, Hough SE, Jacob KH (1990) Using microtremors to assess potential earthquake site response: a case study in Flushing Meadows, New York City. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80(6A):1456–1480Google Scholar
  6. Griffiths JS, Stokes M, Stead D, Giles D (2012) Landscape evolution and engineering geology: results from IAEG Commission 22. Bull Eng Geol Env 71(4):605–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grimmond CSB, Salmond JA, Oke TR, Offerle B, Lemonsu A (2004) Flux and turbulence measurements at a densely built-up site in Marseille: Heat, mass (water and carbon dioxide), and momentum. J Geophys Res Atmos 109:D24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holec J, Bednarik M, Šabo M, Minár J, Yilmaz I, Marschalko M (2013) A small-scale landslide susceptibility assessment for the territory of Western Carpathians. Nat Hazards 69(1):1081–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jin H, Wei Z, Wang S, Yu Q, Lü L, Wu Q, Ji Y (2008) Assessment of frozen-ground conditions for engineering geology along the Qinghai–Tibet highway and railway. China Eng Geol 101(3):96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson KL, Younger PL (2006) The co-treatment of sewage and mine waters in aerobic wetlands. Eng Geol 85(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kesel RH (1988) The decline in the suspended load of the lower Mississippi River and its influence on adjacent wetlands. Environ Geol 11(3):271–281Google Scholar
  12. Kycl P, Zítová E, Krejčí Z (2009) Engineering geological zones, Czech geological survey, Prague In Hrnčiarová T, Mackovčin P, Zvara I et al Landscape Atlas of the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, Průhonice: The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, v. v. i., 332 p. ISBN: 978-80-85116-59-5Google Scholar
  13. Lamich D, Marschalko M, Yilmaz I, Bednářová P, Niemiec D, Durďák J, Kubečka K, Duda R (2016) Utilization of engineering geology in geo-tourism: few case studies of subsidence influence on historical churches in Ostrava-Karvina District (Czech Republic). Environ Earth Sci 75(2):128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao QL, Li X, Lee S, Dong YH (2005) Occurrence, geology and geomorphy characteristics and origin of Qianjiangping landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area and study on ancient landslide criterion. Chin J Rock Mechan Eng 24(17):3146–3153Google Scholar
  15. Marschalko M, Yilmaz I, Bednárik M, Kubečka K (2011) Variations in the building site categories in the underground mining region of Doubrava (Czech Republic) for land use planning. Eng Geol 122(3):169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marschalko M, Bednárik M, Yilmaz I (2012) Evaluation of engineering-geological conditions for conurbation of Ostrava (Czech Republic) within GIS environment. Environ Earth Sci 67(4):1007–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marschalko M, Yilmaz I, Bednárik M, Kubečka K, Bouchal T (2013) Application of the engineering-geological conditions in land-use plans in the Petrvald region (Czech Republic). Acta Geol Sin 87(1):272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morton RA, Bernier JC, Barras JA (2006) Evidence of regional subsidence and associated interior wetland loss induced by hydrocarbon production, Gulf Coast region. USA Environ Geol 50(2):261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mu FY, Zhang ZX, Chi YB, Liu B, Zhou QB, Wang CY, Tan WB (2007) Dynamic monitoring of built-up area in Beijing during 1973–2005 based on multi-original remote sensed images. J Remote Sens Beijing 11(2):257Google Scholar
  20. Qun G, Hao-wu LIU (2001) Research of geology landscape technology in VR-GIS. Acta Simul Syst Sin S, 2Google Scholar
  21. Shu S, Yu BL, Wu JP, Liu HX (2011) Methods for deriving urban built-up area using night-light data: assessment and application. Remote Sensing Technology Application 26(2):169–176Google Scholar
  22. Wang L, Ma C (1999) A study on the environmental geology of the middle route project of the South–North water transfer. Eng Geol 51(3):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wdowinski S, Kim SW, Amelung F, Dixon TH, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Sonenshein R (2008) Space-based detection of wetlands’ surface water level changes from L-band SAR interferometry. Remote Sens Environ 112(3):681–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wondzell SM, King JG (2003) Postfire erosional processes in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain regions. For Ecol Manage 178(1):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yaxin ZFZHS (2007) CHEN Li Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050061; The Effect of Coal-mining Subsidence on Water Environment in the Shenfu-Dongsheng Mining Area [J]. Acta Geosci Sin 6Google Scholar
  26. Yeon YK, Han JG, Ryu KH (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree. Eng Geol 116(3):274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian Marschalko
    • 1
  • Isik Yilmaz
    • 2
    Email author
  • David Krčmář
    • 3
  • Xianfeng Cheng
    • 4
  • Jan Kubáč
    • 1
  • Petr Kycl
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Mining and Geology, Institute of Geological EngineeringVŠB-Technical University of OstravaOstravaCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Hydrogeology, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia
  4. 4.Yunnan Land and Resources Vocational CollegeKunmingPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Czech Geological SurveyPraha 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations