Advertisement

Inland impacts of atmospheric river and tropical cyclone extremes on nitrate transport and stable isotope measurements

  • A. HusicEmail author
  • J. Fox
  • E. Adams
  • J. Backus
  • E. Pollock
  • W. Ford
  • C. Agouridis
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Characterization, Modeling, and Remediation of Karst in a Changing Environment

Abstract

Atmospheric rivers and tropical cyclones originate in the tropics and can transport high rainfall amounts to inland temperate regions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of nitrate (NO3) pathways, concentration peaks, and stable isotope (δ15NNO3, δ18ONO3, δ2HH2O, δ18OH2O, and δ13CDIC) measurements to these extreme events. A tropical cyclone and atmospheric river produced the number one and four ranked events in 2017, respectively, at a Kentucky USA watershed characterized by mature karst topography. Hydrologic responses from the two events were different due to rainfall characteristics with the tropical cyclone producing a steeper rising limb of the spring hydrograph and greater runoff generation to the surface stream compared to the atmospheric river. Local minima and maxima of specific conductance, δ2HH2O, δ18OH2O, and δ13CDIC coincided with hydrograph peaks for both events. Minima and maxima of NO3, δ15NNO3, δ18ONO3, and temperature lagged behind the hydrograph peak for both events, and the values continued to be impacted by diffuse recharge during hydrograph recession. Quick-flow pathways accounted for less than 20% of the total NO3 yield, while intermediate (30%) and slow-flow (50%) pathways composed the remaining load. However, hydrograph separation into quick-, intermediate-, and slow-flow pathways was not able to predict the timing of NO3 concentration peaks. Rather, the intermediate-flow pathway is conceptualized to experience a shift in porosity, associated with a change from epikarst macropores and fissures to soil micropores, with the arrival of water from the latter component likely causing peak NO3 concentration at the spring. Our results suggest that a more discretized conceptual model of pathways may be needed to predict peak nutrient concentration in rivers draining karst topography.

Keywords

Karst Nitrate Pathways Contaminant transport Extreme events 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the thematic issue guest editor Zexuan Xu and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which helped to greatly improve the quality of the manuscript. The authors would like to acknowledge the researchers and staff at the Kentucky Geological Survey, in particular, Chuck Taylor and James Currens, and the University of Arkansas Stable Isotope Laboratory. We also thank the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Kentucky for partial funding of students involved with this research study. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of this research under National Science Foundation Award 1632888. Data will be stored and publicly available at the following link: https://figshare.com/articles/EES_TI_Karst_Extremes/7170347.

References

  1. Al Aamery N, Fox JF, Snyder M (2016) Evaluation of climate modeling factors impacting the variance of streamflow. J Hydrol 542:125–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Aamery N, Fox JF, Snyder M, Chandramouli CV (2018) Variance analysis of forecasted streamflow maxima in a wet temperate climate. J Hydrol 560:364–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertin AR, Sickman JO, Pinowska A, Stevenson RJ (2012) Identification of nitrogen sources and transformations within karst springs using isotope tracers of nitrogen. Biogeochemistry 108:219–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9592-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baran N, Lepiller M, Mouvet C (2008) Agricultural diffuse pollution in a chalk aquifer (Trois Fontaines, France): influence of pesticide properties and hydrodynamic constraints. J Hydrol 358:56–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauwe A, Tiemeyer B, Kahle P, Lennartz B (2015) Classifying hydrological events to quantify their impact on nitrate leaching across three spatial scales. J Hydrol 531:589–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buda AR, DeWalle DR (2009) Dynamics of stream nitrate sources and flow pathways during stormflows on urban, forest and agricultural watersheds in central Pennsylvania, USA. Hydrol Process 23:3292–3305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns DA, Miller MP, Pellerin BA, Capel PD (2016) Patterns of diel variation in nitrate concentrations in the Potomac River. Freshw Sci 35:1117–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1086/688777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cánovas CR, Hubbard CG, Olías M, Nieto JM, Black S, Coleman ML (2008) Hydrochemical variations and contaminant load in the Río Tinto (Spain) during flood events. J Hydrol 350:25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casciotti KL, Sigman DM, Hastings MG, Böhlke JK, Hilkert A (2002) Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier method. Anal Chem 74:4905–4912.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020113w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christopher SF, Mitchell MJ, McHale MR, Boyer EW, Douglas BA, Kendall C (2008) Factors controlling nitrogen release from two forested catchments with contrasting hydrochemical responses. Hydrol Process 22:46–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cressman ER, Peterson WL (1986) Ordovician system. In: McDowell RC (ed) The geology of Kentucky: a text to accompany the geologic map of Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1151-H, USGoogle Scholar
  12. Debbage N, Miller P, Poore S, Morano K, Mote T, Marshall Shepherd J (2017) A climatology of atmospheric river interactions with the southeastern United States coastline. Int J Climatol 37:4077–4091.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di HJ, Cameron KC (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 64:237–256.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021471531188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodds WK, Smith VH (2016) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams. Inland Waters 6:155–164.  https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-6.2.909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drahovzal JA, Harris DC, Wickstrom LH, Walker D, Baranoski MT, Keith B, Furer LC (1992) The east continent rift basin: a new discovery. Kentucky Geological Survey 18 Ser. XI, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenton O, Mellander PE, Daly K, Wall DP, Jahangir MMR, Jordan P, Hennessey D, Huebsch M, Blum P, Vero S, Richards KG (2017) Integrated assessment of agricultural nutrient pressures and legacies in karst landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 239:246–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiorillo F (2014) The Recession of spring hydrographs, focused on karst aquifers. Water Resour Manag 28:1781–1805.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0597-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Florea LJ, Vacher HL (2006) Springflow hydrographs: eogenetic vs. telogenetic karst. Ground Water 44:352–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford WI, Williams MR, Young MB, King KW, Fischer E (2018) Assessing intra-event phosphorus dynamics in drainage water using phosphate stable oxygen isotopes. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 61:1379–1392.  https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao Y, Fu JS, Drake JB, Liu Y, Lamarque JF (2012) Projected changes of extreme weather events in the eastern United States based on a high resolution climate modeling system. Environ Res Lett  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gehre M, Geilmann H, Richter J, Werner RA, Brand WA (2004) Continuous flow 2H/1H and 18O/16O analysis of water samples with dual inlet precision. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:2650–2660.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geyer T, Birk S, Licha T, Liedl R, Sauter M (2007) Multitracer test approach to characterize reactive transport in karst aquifers. Ground Water 45:36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00261.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geyer T, Birk S, Liedl R, Sauter M (2008) Quantification of temporal distribution of recharge in karst systems from spring hydrographs. J Hydrol 348:452–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartmann A, Mudarra M, Andreo B, Marin A, Wagener T, Lange J (2014) Modelling spatiotemporal impacts of hydroclimatic extremes on groundwater recharge at a Mediterranean karst aquifer. Water Resour Res 50:6507–6521.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015685.Received CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herman EK, Toran L, White WB (2008) Threshold events in spring discharge: evidence from sediment and continuous water level measurement. J Hydrol 351:98–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huebsch M, Fenton O, Horan B, Hennessy D, Richards KG, Jordan P, Goldscheider N, Butscher C, Blum P (2014) Mobilisation or dilution? Nitrate response of karst springs to high rainfall events. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:4423–4435.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4423-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Husic A (2015) Sediment organic carbon fate and transport in a fluviokarst. Master’s Thesis. University of Kentucky. Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  28. Husic A (2018) Numerical modeling and isotope tracers to investigate karst biogeochemistry and transport processes. PhD Dissertation. University of Kentucky. Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  29. Husic A, Fox JF, Agouridis C, Currens JC, Ford WI, Taylor CJ (2017a) Sediment carbon fate in phreatic karst (Part 1): conceptual model development. J Hydrol 549:179–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Husic A, Fox JF, Ford WI, Agouridis C, Currens JC, Taylor CJ (2017b) Sediment carbon fate in phreatic karst (Part 2): numerical model development and application. J Hydrol 549:208–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2017.03.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inamdar SP, Christopher SF, Mitchell MJ (2004) Export mechanisms for dissolved organic carbon and nitrate during summer storm events in a glaciated forested catchment in New York, USA. Hydrol Process 18:2651–2661.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jarsjö J, Chalov SR, Pietroń J, Alekseenko AV, Thorslund J (2017) Patterns of soil contamination, erosion and river loading of metals in a gold mining region of northern Mongolia. Reg Environ Chang 17:1991–2005.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1169-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarvie HP, Sharpley AN, Brahana V, Simmons T, Price A, Neal C, Lawlor AJ, Sleep D, Thacker S, Haggard BE (2014) Phosphorus retention and remobilization along hydrological pathways in karst terrain. Environ Sci Technol 48:4860–4868.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es405585b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Katz BG, Griffin DW, McMahon PB, Harden HS, Wade E, Hicks RW, Chanton JP (2010) Fate of effluent-borne contaminants beneath septic tank drainfields overlying a karst aquifer. J Environ Qual 39:1181.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kendall C, Elliott EM, Wankel SD (2007) Tracing anthropogenic inputs of nitrogen to ecosystems. In: Michener RH, Lajtha K (eds) Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, USA, pp 375–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klaus J, Zehe E, Elsner M, Külls C, McDonnell JJ (2013) Macropore flow of old water revisited: experimental insights from a tile-drained hillslope. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:103–118.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-103-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knierim KJ, Pollock E, Hays PD (2013) Using isotopes of dissolved inorganic carbon species and water to separate sources of recharge in a Cave Spring, Northwestern Arkansas, USA. Acta Carsologica 42:261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knight DB, Davis RE (2009) Contribution of tropical cyclones to extreme rainfall events in the southeastern United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 114:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koenig LE, Shattuck MD, Snyder LE, Potter JD, McDowell WH (2017) Deconstructing the effects of flow on DOC, nitrate, and major ion interactions using a high-frequency aquatic sensor network. Water Resour Res 53:10655–10673.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lal R, Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Millar N, Dell C, Rotz A (2011) Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66:276–285.  https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larson J, Zhou Y, Higgins RW (2005) Characteristics of landfalling tropical cyclones in the United States and Mexico: climatology and interannual variability. J Clim 18:1247–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3317.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lavers DA, Villarini G (2013) Atmospheric rivers and flooding over the central United States. J Clim 26:7829–7836.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00212.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lavers DA, Villarini G, Allan RP, Wood EF, Wade AJ (2012) The detection of atmospheric rivers in atmospheric reanalyses and their links to British winter floods and the large-scale climatic circulation. J Geophys Res Atmos 117:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawrence JR, Gedzelman SD (1996) Low stable isotope ratios of tropical cyclone rains. Geophys Res Lett 23:527–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee ES, Krothe NC (2001) A four-component mixing model for water in a karst terrain in south-central Indiana, USA. Using solute concentration and stable isotopes as tracers. Chem Geol 179:129–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00319-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luhmann AJ, Covington MD, Alexander SC, Chai SY, Schwartz BF, Groten JT, Alexander EC (2012) Comparing conservative and nonconservative tracers in karst and using them to estimate flow path geometry. J Hydrol 448–449:201–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin JB, Dean RW (2001) Exchange of water between conduits and matrix in the Floridan aquifer. Chem Geol 179:145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00320-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mellander P-E, Melland AR, Jordan P, Wall DP, Murphy PNC, Shortle G (2012) Quantifying nutrient transfer pathways in agricultural catchments using high temporal resolution data. Environ Sci Policy 24:44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller MP, Tesoriero AJ, Hood K, Terziotti S, Wolock DM (2017) Estimating discharge and nonpoint source nitrate loading to streams from three end-member pathways using high-frequency water quality data. Water Resour Res 53:10201–10216.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moatar F, Abbott BW, Minaudo C, Curie F, Pinay G (2017) Elemental properties, hydrology, and biology interact to shape concentration-discharge curves for carbon, nutrients, sediment, and major ions. Water Resour Res 53:1270–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Molson J, Pehme P, Cherry J, Parker B (2007) Numerical analysis of heat transport within fractured sedimentary rock: implications for temperature probes. In: EPA Fractured rock conference: state of the science and measuring success in remediation (#5017). Portland, MaineGoogle Scholar
  52. Moore BJ, Neiman PJ, Ralph FM, Barthold FE (2012) Physical processes associated with heavy flooding rainfall in Nashville, Tennessee, and Vicinity during 1–2 May 2010: the role of an atmospheric river and mesoscale convective systems. Mon Weather Rev 140:358–378.  https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00126.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. NHC NOAA (National Hurricane Center) (2017) Hurricane NATE advisory archive. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/NATE.shtml? Accessed 6 Nov 2017
  54. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2017a) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: overview. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions. Accessed 6 May 2018
  55. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2017b) Lexington Blue Grass Airport. http://w1.weather.gov/data/obhistory/KLEX.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  56. Padilla IY, Vesper D (2018) Fate, transport, and exposure of emerging and legacy contaminants in karst systems: state of knowledge and uncertainty. In: White WB, Herman JS, Herman EK, Rutigliano M (eds) Karst groundwater contamination and public health. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 33–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Panno SV, Hackley KC, Hwang HH, Kelly WR (2001) Determination of the sources of nitrate contamination in karst springs using isotopic and chemical indicators. Chem Geol 179:113–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00318-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paylor R, Currens JC (2004) Royal springs karst groundwater travel time investigation. A report prepared for Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer Service. Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
  59. Pellerin BA, Downing BD, Kendall C, Dahlgren RA, Kraus TEC, Saraceno J, Spencer RGM, Bergamaschi BA (2009) Assessing the sources and magnitude of diurnal nitrate variability in the San Joaquin River (California) with an in situ optical nitrate sensor and dual nitrate isotopes. Freshw Biol 54:376–387.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02111.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phillips JD (2015) Emergent ecosystem engineering in epikarst. https://geography.as.uky.edu/blogs/jdp/emergent-ecosystem-engineering-epikarst. Accessed 6 May 2018
  61. Phillips JD, Martin LL, Nordberg VG, Andrews WA (2004) Divergent evolution in fluviokarst landscapes of central Kentucky. Earth Surf Process Landf 29:799–819.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ralph FM, Dettinger MD (2012) Historical and national perspectives on extreme west coast precipitation associated with atmospheric rivers during December 2010. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00188.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rusjan S, Brilly M, Mikoš M (2008) Flushing of nitrate from a forested watershed: an insight into hydrological nitrate mobilization mechanisms through seasonal high-frequency stream nitrate dynamics. J Hydrol 354:187–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rutz JJ, Steenburgh WJ, Ralph FM (2014) Climatological characteristics of atmospheric rivers and their inland penetration over the Western United States. Mon Weather Rev 142:905–921.  https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00168.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schilling KE, Helmers M (2008) Tile drainage as karst: conduit flow and diffuse flow in a tile-drained watershed. J Hydrol 349:291–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shepherd JM, Grundstein A, Mote TL (2007) Quantifying the contribution of tropical cyclones to extreme rainfall along the coastal southeastern United States. Geophys Res Lett 34:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sigman DM, Casciotti KL, Andreani M, Barford C, Galanter M, Böhlke JK (2001) A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater. Anal Chem 73:4145–4153.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010088e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sinha E, Michalak AM (2016) Precipitation dominates interannual variability of riverine nitrogen loading across the continental United States. Environ Sci Technol 50:12874–12884.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spangler LE (1982) Karst hydrogeology of northern Fayette and southern Scott counties, Kentucky. Master’s Thesis. University of Kentucky. Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  70. St-Jean G (2003) Automated quantitative and isotopic (13C) analysis of dissolved inorganic carbon and dissolved organic carbon in continuous-flow using a total organic carbon analyser. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:419–428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taylor CJ (1992) Ground-water occurrence and movement associated with sinkhole alignments in the Inner Bluegrass Karst region of central Kentucky. Master’s Thesis. University of Kentucky. Lexington, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  72. Tesoriero AJ, Duff JH, Saad DA, Spahr NE, Wolock DM (2013) Vulnerability of streams to legacy nitrate sources. Environ Sci Technol 47:3623–3629.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es305026x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thrailkill J, Sullivan SB, Gouzie DR (1991) Flow parameters in a shallow conduit-flow carbonate aquifer, Inner Bluegrass Karst region, Kentucky, USA. J Hydrol 129:87–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90046-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tomer MD, Schilling KE (2009) A simple approach to distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed hydrology. J Hydrol 376:24–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Toran L, White WB (2005) Variation in nitrate and calcium as indicators of recharge pathways in Nolte Spring, PA. Environ Geol 48:854–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0018-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tzoraki O, Nikolaidis NP (2007) A generalized framework for modeling the hydrologic and biogeochemical response of a Mediterranean temporary river basin. J Hydrol 346:112–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. UKCAFE (University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food, and the Environment) (2011) Cane Run and Royal Spring watershed-based plan, version 5. EPA project number C9994861-06. http://www.bae.uky.edu/CaneRun/PDFs/Cane_Run_WBP _2011.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2018
  78. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (1993) Soil survey manual. Handbook no. 18. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  79. Vesper DJ, White WB (2004) Storm pulse chemographs of saturation index and carbon dioxide pressure: implications for shifting recharge sources during storm events in the karst aquifer at Fort Campbell, Kentucky/Tennessee, USA. Hydrogeol J 12:135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-003-0299-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams PW (2008) The role of the epikarst in karst and cave hydrogeology: a review. Int J Speleol 37:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2423146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Winston WE, Criss RE (2004) Dynamic hydrologic and geochemical response in a perennial karst spring. Water Resour Res 40:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xue D, Botte J, De Baets B, Accoe F, Nestler A, Taylor P, Van Cleemput O, Berglund M, Boeckx P (2009) Present limitations and future prospects of stable isotope methods for nitrate source identification in surface- and groundwater. Water Res 43:1159–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yue F-J, Li S-L, Zhong J, Liu J (2018) Evaluation of factors driving seasonal nitrate variations in surface and underground systems of a karst catchment. Vadose Zo J 17:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.04.0071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhu J, Currens JC, Dinger JS (2011) Challenges of using electrical resistivity method to locate karst conduits—a field case in the Inner Bluegrass region, Kentucky. J Appl Geophys 75:523–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Kentucky Geological SurveyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  4. 4.Stable Isotope LaboratoryUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biosystems and Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations