Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 77:629 | Cite as

Hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a Quaternary sediment and Cretaceous sandstone unconfined aquifer in Northwestern China

  • Zhi-Qiang Yu
  • Hiroki Amano
  • Kei Nakagawa
  • Ronny Berndtsson
Original Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

A better understanding of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in vulnerable aquifers is important for the protection of water resources. To assess groundwater chemistry, groundwater sampling was performed from different representative aquifers in 2012–2013. A Piper trilinear diagram showed that the groundwater types can be classified into Na–SO4 and Na–Cl types. Only one groundwater sample was Na–HCO3 type. The dominant cations for all samples were Na+. However, the dominant anions varied from HCO3 to SO42−, and as well Cl. The mean total dissolved solid (TDS) content of groundwater in the region was 1889 mg/L. Thus, only 20% of groundwater samples meet Chinese drinking water standards (< 1000 mg/L). Principal component analysis (PCA) combined with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and self-organizing maps (SOM) were applied for the classification of the groundwater geochemistry. The three first principal components explained 58, 20, and 16% of the variance, respectively. The first component reflects sulfate minerals (gypsum, anhydrite) and halite dissolution, and/or evaporation in the shallow aquifer. The second and third components are interpreted as carbonate rock dissolution. The reason for two factors is that the different aquifers give rise to different degree of hydrogeochemical evolution (different travel distances and travel times). Identified clusters for evolution characteristic and influencing factors were confirmed by the PCA–HCA methods. Using information from eight ion components and SOM, formation mechanisms and influencing factors for the present groundwater quality were determined.

Keywords

Self-organizing maps Hydrogeochemical characteristics The Dosit River Principal component analysis Sulfate minerals 

References

  1. Aiuppa A, Bellomo S, Brusca L, D’Alessandro W, Federico C (2003) Natural and anthropogenic factors affecting groundwater quality of an active volcano (Mt. Etna, Italy). Appl Geochem 18(6):863–882.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00182-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banoeng-Yakubo B, Yidana SM, Nti E (2009) Hydrochemical analysis of groundwater using multivariate statistical methods—the Volta region, Ghana. KSCE J Civ Eng 13(1):55–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-009-0055-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown C (1998) Applied multivariate statistics in geohydrology and related sciences. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chebotarev II (1955) Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering-1. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 8(1–2):22–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(55)90015-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi BY, Yun ST, Kim KH, Kim JW, Kim HM, Koh YK (2014) Hydrogeochmical interpretation of South Korean groundwater monitoring data using self-organizing maps. J Geochem Explor 137:73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cloutier V, Lefebvre R, Therrien R, Savard MM (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J Hydrol 353(3–4):294–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. García HL, González IM (2004) Self-organizing map and clustering for wastewater treatment monitoring. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17(3):215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2004.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Güler C, Thyne GD, McCray JE, Turner KA (2002) Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol J 10(4):455–474.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0196-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hentati A, Kawamura A, Amaguchi H, Iseri Y (2010) Evaluation of sedimentation vulnerability at small hillside reservoirs in the semi-arid region of Tunisia using the Self-Organizing Map. Geomorphology 122(1–2):56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang XW, Wan L, Ge S, Cao GL, Hou GC, Hu FS, Wang XS, Li H, Liang SH (2012) A quantitative study on accumulation of age mass around stagnation points in nested flow systems. Water Resour Res 48(12):W12502.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang JZ, Yin BX, Fu WX, Lin CH (2014) Field identification of groundwater flow systems and hydraulic traps in drainage basins using a geophysical method. Geophys Res Lett 41(8):2812–2819.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang XS, Wang D, Wang H, Wang JZ, Zhang H, Zhang ZY, Zhao KY (2018) A multi-method study of regional groundwater circulation in the Ordos Plateau, NW China. Hydrogeol J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1731-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin YH, Kawamura A, Park SC, Nakagawa N, Amaguchi H, Olsson J (2011) Spatiotemporal classification of environmental monitoring data in the Yeongsan River basin, Korea, using self-organizing maps. J Environ Monit 13(10):2886–2894.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EM10132C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalteh AM, Berndtsson R (2007) Interpolating monthly precipitation by self-organizing map (SOM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Hydrol Sci J 52(2):305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.2.305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Montcoudiol N, Molson J, Lemieux JM (2015) Groundwater geochemistry of the Outaouais Region (Québec Canada): a regional-scale study. Hydrogeol J 23(2):377–396.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1190-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morell L, Giménez E, Esteller MV (1996) Application of principal component analysis to the study of salinization on the Castellon Plain (Spain). Sci Total Environ 177(1–3):161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04893-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakagawa K, Amano H, Asakura H, Berndtsson R (2016) Spatial trends of nitrate pollution and groundwater chemistry in Shimabara, Nagasaki, Japan. Environ Earth Sci 75:234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4971-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakagawa K, Amano H, Kawamura A, Berndtsson R (2017) Classification of groundwater chemistry in Shimabara, using self-organizing maps. Hydrol Res 48(3):840–850.  https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen TT, Kawamura A, Tong TN, Nakagawa N, Amaguchi H, Gilbuena R (2015) Clustering spatio-seasonal hydrogeochemical data using self-organizing maps for groundwater quality assessment in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. J Hydrol 522:661–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishiyama K, Endo S, Jinno K, Betracchi Uvo C, Olsson J, Berndtsson R (2007) Identification of typical synoptic patterns causing heavy rainfall in the rainy season in Japan by a Self-Organizing Map. Atmos Res 83(2–4):185–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3-A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculation. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A43. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43. Accessed 8 July 2018
  24. Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geo chemical interpretation of water analysis. Trans Am Geophys Union 25(6):914–928.  https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schoeller H (1972) Geochemistry of ground water. In: Brown RH (ed) Ground-water studies: an international guide for research and practice. UNESCO, Paris, pp 457–498Google Scholar
  26. Singhal BBS, Gupta RP (2010) Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks, Second edn. Springer Netherland, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun FQ (2010) Research on groundwater circulation and environment effect of Dosit River in Ordos Basin. Changan University, Xi’an (in Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  28. Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parahankangas J (2000) SOM toolbox for Matlab 5, Helsinki University of Technology Report A57Google Scholar
  29. Wang H, Jiang XW, Wan L, Han G, Guo H (2015) Hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater flow systems in the discharge areas of a river basin. J Hydrol 527:433–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang JZ, Wörman A, Bresciani E, Wan L, Wang XS, Jiang XW (2016) On the use of late-time peaks of residence time distributions for the characterization of hierarchically nested groundwater flow systems. J Hydrol 543:47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin L, Hou GC, Su XS, Wang D, Dong J, Hao Y, Wang X (2011) Isotopes (δD and δ18O) in precipitation, groundwater and surface water in the Ordos Plateau, China: implications with respect to groundwater recharge and circulation. Hydrogeol J 19(2):429–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0671-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu H, Song Y, Liu R, Pan H, Xiang L, Qian F (2014) Identifying changes in dissolved organic matter content and characteristics by fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with self-organizing map and classification and regression tree analysis during wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 113:79–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental SciencesNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan
  2. 2.Division of Water Resources Engineering and Center for Middle Eastern StudiesLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations