Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 32–39 | Cite as

Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Height Gained by Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Titanium Mesh and Novabone Putty in Posterior Mandible

  • Rahul MalikEmail author
  • Ashish Gupta
  • Pankaj Bansal
  • Rahul Sharma
  • Sneha Sharma
Clinical Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this case series was to report the clinical and radiographical outcomes of vertical ridge augmentation in edentulous posterior mandible using a combination of titanium mesh with novabone putty.

Material and Method

Twenty patients were included, and grafting was done using alloplastic novabone putty supported by titanium mesh as the barrier for guided bone regeneration.

Results

Sixteen patients exhibited good soft tissue healing. Postoperative flap dehiscence occurred relatively early in the healing period in one patient followed by graft extrusion and delayed healing in other three patients. The mean vertical height of augmented bone was 4.825 ± 1.1387 mm.

Conclusion

This report demonstrates the remarkable efficacy of guided bone regeneration using a combination of titanium mesh and novabone putty for vertical ridge augmentation, thus expanding the indications for implant therapy and allowing recovery of the three-dimensional esthetic architecture in a severely resorbed alveolar ridge.

Keywords

Alveolar ridge augmentation Dental implants Bone regeneration 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Levin BP (2013) Alveolar ridge augmentation: combining bioresorbable scaffolds with osteoinductive bone grafts in atrophic sites. A follow-up to an evolving technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34(3):178–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newman Michael G, Henry T, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA (2015) Carranza’s clinical periodontology, 12th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 756Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deshpande S, Deshmukh J, Deshpande S, Khatri R, Deshpande S (2014) Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior maxilla using autograft, xenograft and titanium mesh with simultaneous placement of endosseous implants. J Indian Soc Periodontol 18(5):661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agarwala S, Bhagwat A (2005) Hydroxyaetite as a bone substituite: use in cortical and cancellous bone. Indian J Orthop 39(4):254–256Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar P, Belliappa V, Ghousia F (2013) Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 5(Suppl 1):S125–S127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Proussaefs P, Lozada J (2006) Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge ugmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. J Oral Implantol 32(5):237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP (1985) A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(2):87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jovanovic SA, Schenk RK, Orsini M, Kenney EB (1995) Supracrestal bone formation around dental implants: an experimental dog study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10(1):45–62Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP (2001) Longterm evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implant Res 12(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallace S, Gellin R (2010) Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation and implant placement in the maxilla. Implant Dent 19(4):272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M (2006) Vertical bone augmentation with dental implant placement: efficacy and complications associated with 2 different techniques. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21(4):600–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K (2013) Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 33(3):298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clementini M, Morlupi A, Agrestini C, Ottria L (2011) Success rate of dental implants inserted in autologous bone graft regenerated areas: a systematic review. Oral Implantol 4(3–4):3Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Louis PJ, Gutta R, Said-Al-Naief N, Bartolucci AA (2008) Reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with particulate bone graft and titanium mesh for implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL (2009) Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(3):502–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Funato A, Ishikawa T, Kitajima H, Yamada M, Moroi H (2013) A novel combined surgical approach to vertical alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh, resorbable membrane, and rhPDGF-BB: a retrospective consecutive case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 33(4):437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araújo PP, Oliveira KP, Montenegro SC, Carreiro AF, Silva JS, Germano AR (2013) Block allograft for reconstruction of alveolar bone ridge in implantology: a systematic review. Implant Dent 22(3):304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hench LL, Paschall HA (1974) Histochemical responses at a biomaterial's interface. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 8(3):49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anderegg CR, Alexander DC, Freidman M (1999) A bioactive glass particulate in the treatment of molar furcation invasions. J Periodontol 70(4):384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hench LL, West JK (1996) Biological applications of bioactive glasses. Harwood Academic Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hench LL (1988) Bioactive ceramics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 523(1):54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gross U, Strunz V (1985) The interface of various glasses and glass ceramics with a bony implantation bed. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 19(3):251–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 5(6):117–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 174:28–42Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacotti M, Barausse C, Felice P (2013) Posterior atrophic mandible rehabilitation with onlay allograft created with CAD-CAM procedure: a case report. Implant Dent.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borasi P, Kamble P (2016) Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and particulate allograft–a case reportGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S (1998) Vertical ridge augmentation: surgical protocol and retrospective evaluation of 48 consecutively inserted implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 18(5):434–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A (2002) A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 29(s3):226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Malik
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ashish Gupta
    • 1
  • Pankaj Bansal
    • 1
  • Rahul Sharma
    • 1
  • Sneha Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and ResearchFaridabadIndia
  2. 2.GurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations