Vazirani–Akinosi Nerve Block Technique: An Asset of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon

  • Shoeb Kasim JendiEmail author
  • Bibin George Thomas
Original Article



Vazirani–Akinosi nerve block technique is an established and a reliable technique to achieve anaesthesia in mandible with high success rate and is useful in cases where Halstead’s technique fails to provide desired anaesthetic effect.

Materials and Methods

A total of 140 ASA-I or ASA-II patients, both genders, between 16 and 45 years who required extraction of mandibular tooth were divided into two groups. Group A received nerve block through Halstead technique, while Group B received nerve block through Vazirani–Akinosi technique with 2% lignocaine containing 1:200,000 adrenaline. We evaluated the subjective and objective onset of anaesthesia, outcome of the injection, outcome of the aspiration and patient satisfaction.


In Group A, the altered sensation was experienced at 68.70 s, while in Group B it was 92.55 s and the difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) between the two groups. The mean onset of anaesthesia (measured with Electric pulp tester) in Group A was 78.36 s, while for Group B it was 104.24 s and this difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001). Positive aspiration was seen in 11 (15.71%) patients in Group A and in 2 (2.86%) patients in Group B. The success rate for Group A was 81.42% and for Group B it was 97.14%.


Vazirani–Akinosi technique provides desirable surgical anaesthesia with relatively high success rate and lower incidence of positive aspiration and can be considered as a boon for oral and maxillofacial surgeons.


Inferior alveolar nerve block Vazirani–Akinosi technique Closed mouth technique Halstead technique 



I am thankful to Dr. Sneha Jadhav, Dr. Alfiya Halde and Dr. Sanika Kadam for their assistance in photography and sketching the schematic diagram. I would also like to acknowledge my teachers Dr Syed Ahmed, Dr Sheeraz Badal and Dr Amol Doiphode who have influenced and made me to stand where I am today.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study (involving human participants) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Malamed SF (2013) Handbook of local anesthesia, 6th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calatayud J, Gonzalez A (2003) History of the development and evolution of local anesthesia since the coca leaf. Anesthesiology 98(6):1503–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLure HA, Rubin AP (2005) Review of local anaesthetic agents. Min Anestesiol 71(3):59–74Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haas DA (2011) Alternative mandibular nerve block techniques. A review of the Gow-Gates and Akinosi–Vazirani closed-mouth mandibular nerve block techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 142(9 suppl):8S–12SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennett CR (1990) Monheim’s local anesthesia and pain control in dental practice, 7th edn. B.C. Decker, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peterson JK (1971) The mandibular foramen block. A radiographic study of the spread of local analgesic solution. Br J Oral Surg 9(21):126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akinosi JO (1977) A new approach to the mandibular nerve block. Br J Oral Surg 15(1):83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu F, Xiao Y, Liu H, Wu F, Lou F, Chen D, Bai M, Huang D, Wang C, Ye L (2017) Evaluation of three block anesthesia methods for pain management during mandibular third molar extraction: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 20(7):40987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarat RK, Kashyap VM, Uppada UK, Tiwari P, Mishra A, Sachdeva A (2018) Comparison of efficacy of Halstead, Vazirani Akinosi and Gow Gates techniques for mandibular anesthesia. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17(4):570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donkor P, Wong J, Punnia-Moorthy A (1990) An evaluation of the closed mouth mandibular block technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19(4):216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mishra S, Tripathy R, Sabhlok S, Panda PK, Patnaik S (2012) Comparative analysis between direct Conventional Mandibular nerve block and Vazirani–Akinosi closed mouth Mandibular nerve block technique. Int J Adv Res Technol 1(6):112–117Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haas DA (2002) An update on local anesthetics in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 68(9):546–551Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM (2012) Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog 59(3):127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khoury J, Townsend G (2011) Neural blockade anaesthesia of the mandibular nerve and its terminal branches: rationale for different anaesthetic techniques including their advantages and disadvantages. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011:307423. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D (2010) Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani–Akinosi technique, buccal-plus- lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109(2):303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldberg S, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M (2008) Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of the conventional inferior alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani–Akinosi techniques. J Endod 34(11):1306–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryYogita Dental College and HospitalKhed, RatnagiriIndia
  2. 2.Department of PeriodontologyYogita Dental College and HospitalKhed, RatnagiriIndia

Personalised recommendations