Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 266–272 | Cite as

Study of Quality of Life in Patients with Soft Tissue Reconstruction Following Mandibulectomy

  • Kanchan P. Dholam
  • Karthik M. Sadashiva
  • Sandeep GuravEmail author
Original Article



To study the effect of mandibulectomy with soft tissue reconstruction on quality of life (QOL) and functions of speech and swallowing.


Quality of life of 66 patients was evaluated by using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-HN35 questionnaires. Speech was evaluated objectively by Dr. Speech software version 4 and subjectively by a single speech therapist along with swallowing. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months after treatment.


Out of 66 patients, 57 followed up postoperatively. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative QOL, speech, and swallowing was done by using paired ‘t’ test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test as per distribution. When evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-HN35, statistically significant difference was found in the domains of physical function, fatigue, nausea-vomiting, dyspnea and appetite loss, pain, nutrition, swallowing speech and dry mouth. Significant difference was found in speech (maximum intensity) and most of the domains of swallowing.


In EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, all functional scales showed deterioration with maximum in physical function. Symptom scales showed worsening but significant improvement was found in pain when evaluated by EORTC-HN35. However, the global health status/QL was found to be improved marginally.


Quality of life Mandibulectomy Mandibular tumors 



For this study authors have not received any funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study, involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. 1.
    Ryu JK, Stern RL, Robinson MG, Bowers MK, Kubo HD, Donald PJ, Rosenthal SA, Fu KK (1995) Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(3):627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gullane PJ, Holmes H (1986) Mandibular reconstruction: new concepts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112(7):714–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urken ML (1991) Composite free flaps in oromandibular reconstruction: review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(7):724–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis TA, Taylor RC, Rositano SA (1975) Physical problems in obtaining records of the maxillofacial patient. J Prosthet Dent 34(5):539–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beumer J, Curtis T (1979) Acquired defects of the mandible. In: Beumer J et al (eds) Maxillofacial rehabilitation. C.V.Mosby, St Louis, pp 110–112Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millwood J, Fiske J (2001) Lip-biting in patients with profound neuro-disability. Dent Update 28(2):105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassid VJ, Maqusi S, Culligan E, Cohen MN, Antony AK (2012) Free microsurgical and pedicled flaps for oncological mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects and evaluation of patient comorbidities. ISRN Surg 2012:792674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaukar DA, Das AK, Deshpande MS, Pai PS, Pathak KA, Chaturvedi P, Kakade AC, Hawaldar RW, D’Cruz AK (2005) Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 and European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-H&N 35 in Indian patients. Indian J Cancer 42(4):178–184Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bachher GK, Dholam KP (2010) Long term rehabilitation of a total glossectomy patient. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 10(3):194–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Bachher (1993) Effective speech and psychotherapeutic programme for head and neck cancer patients. In: Ph.D. Thesis, SNDT University, MaharashtraGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becker ST, Menzebach M, Küchler T, Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Wiltfang J (2012) Quality of life in oral cancer patients–effects of mandible resection and socio-cultural aspects. J Cranio-Maxillo-Fac Surg 40(1):24–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schliephake H, Jamil MU (2002) Prospective evaluation of quality of life after oncologic surgery for oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillo-Fac Surg 31(4):427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisbruch A, Kim HM, Terrell JE, Marsh LH, Dawson LA, Ship JA (2001) Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50(3):695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kakoei S, Haghdoost AA, Rad M, Mohammadalizadeh S, Pourdamghan N, Nakhaei M, Bahador M (2012) Xerostomia after radiotherapy and its effect on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Arch Iran Med 15(4):214–218Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Doornaert P, Buter J, de Bree R, Langendijk JA, Aaronson NK, Leemans CR (2016) Prevalence of swallowing and speech problems in daily life after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer based on cut-off scores of the patient reported outcome measures SWAL-QOL and SHI. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(7):1849–1855. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Graeff A, de Leeuw JR, Ros WJ, Hordijk GJ, Blijham GH, Winnubst JA (2000) Long-term quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 110(1):98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Rinkel RN, Langendijk JA, Roos JC, David EF, de Bree R, Leemans CR (2007) Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction. Head Neck 29(7):638–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Namaki S, Matsumoto M, Ohba H, Tanaka H, Koshikawa N, Shinohara M (2004) Masticatory efficiency before and after surgery in oral cancer patients: comparative study of glossectomy, marginal mandibulectomy, and segmental mandibulectomy. J Oral Sci 46(2):113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beumer J, Marunick MT, Curtis TA, Roumanas E (1996) Acquired defects of the mandible: etiology, treatment, and rehabilitation. In: Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT (eds) Prosthodontic and surgical considerations. Maxillofacial rehabilitation, Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, St. Louis, pp 183–189Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schneider RL, Taylor TD (1986) Mandibular resection guidance prostheses: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 55(1):84–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robinson JE, Rubright WC (1964) Use of a guide plane for maintaining the residual fragment in partial or hemimandibulectomy. J Prosthet Dent 14:992–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dental and Prosthetic SurgeryTata Memorial Hospital, HBNIParel, MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.The Sultan’s Special ForceAzaiba, MuscatOman

Personalised recommendations