Emergency Treatment of Blast, Shell Fragment and Bullet Injuries to the Central Midface Complex
- 62 Downloads
Current ballistics and high-energy explosion possess unnoticed, new and significant biophysics and pathophysiology wounding effects that are unique in comparison with civilian trauma. The primary blast wave effects of compressed air due to explosion lead to tattered and crushed eggshell injuries to the upper central midface (UCM). High-energy shell fragments of various shapes and sizes cause extensive destruction and are different from assault rifle’s bullets that cause high energy transfer to the tissue by creating a temporary cavitation.
Twenty-one patients with unquantifiable war injuries were selected. The emergency managment of lifesaving facial war injuries starts with life threatening hemorrahge or air compramise. This article describes immediate management of medial canthal tendon (MCT), intercanthal region and severe nasal war injuries.
The utilized procedure obtained good results compared to the results of cases treated only by applying a classic approach of civilian fractures.
Treatments of UCM injuries are the most difficult since UCM includes the esthetic, physiologic, and anatomical regions of the face. The proposed technique provides immediate excellent stability for soft tissues, bone, and cartilage and is well tolerated in the long term by both the tissue and the patient. Most of the times, victims are treated with limited resources, deficient subspecialty, massive injuries, during mass casualties, and a single surgeon must have to handle all these within a short period of time. UCM injuries are really concerning since this region is the core of facial esthetic and function.
KeywordsBlast Shrapnel Bullet Upper central midface Nose Orbits Ethmoid
The author thanks Miss Gillian Elder and staff at the West Bloomfield Library in Michigan for their assistance in this paper.
No any financial interests the authors may have in companies or other entities that have an interest in the information in the Contribution (e.9., National Institutes of Health (NIH); Welcome Trust; Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI); grants, advisory boards, employment, consultancies, contracts, honoraria, royalties, expert testimony, partnerships, or stock ownership in medically related fields).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Marc A (2014) Conflict and violence in the 21st century current trends as observed in empirical research and statistics. Chief Specialist, Fragility, Conflict and Violence World Bank GroupGoogle Scholar
- 9.Slotnick JA (2010) Explosive threats and target hardening understanding explosive forces, its impact on infrastructure and the human body. In: Fourth International symposium on tunnel safety and security, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, March 17–19Google Scholar
- 12.Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R (1991) Assessing the effectiveness of conventional weapons. In: Bellamy RF, Zajtchuk R (eds) Textbook of military medicine, conventional warfare. VA: Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army, Falls Church, pp 55–69Google Scholar
- 19.Gruss JS (1995) Craniofacial osteotomies and rigid fixation in the correction of post traumatic craniofacial deformities. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl 27:83–95Google Scholar