Soft-Tissue Anthropometric Norms of Iranians with Proper Occlusion and Inter-Ethnic Norm Comparisons
- 38 Downloads
Photographic soft-tissue norms of Iranian race are not reported previously, nor are they compared with other ethnicities. Besides, sex dimorphism is assessed in only very few studies on soft-tissue profile. The aim of this study was to assess the soft-tissue measurements of Iranians with good occlusion and the existing sex dimorphism and to compare the Iranian norms with other ethnicities.
Materials and Methods
Twelve anthropometric variables were measured by a dentist in 100 Iranian subjects with good occlusions. The subjects included 50 males and 50 females. The differences between the two genders, as well as the differences between Iranian norms and the norms in all other ethnicities available in the literature were statistically analyzed using a t test (α = 0.05).
There were significant differences between males and females regarding frontonasal angle (P = 0.0000), mentolabial sulcus (P = 0.0000), vertical height ratio (P = 0.0000), vertical lip–chin ratio (P = 0.0013), nasolabial angle (P = 0.0019), lower vertical height–depth ratio (P = 0.0029), maxillary prognathism (P = 0.0045), and mandibular prognathism (P = 0.0118). The difference in facial convexity was marginally significant (P = 0.0543). Protrusions of both lips and horizontal distance between the lips were not significantly different between sexes (P > 0.2).
Unlike Americans and Brazilians but similar to Koreans, there was considerable sex dimorphism in Iranians. Compared to Iranian men, women might have more convex profiles, more advanced mandibles (unlike all other races studied), more protruded maxillae, lips closer to the middle of nose-chin vertical distance, deeper mentolabial sulci, less protruded noses with higher nose tips, and smaller lower faces.
KeywordsAnthropometry Ethnic groups Orthodontic photography Sex dimorphism
BK mentored the thesis on photographic factors associated with beauty (published earlier). ER selected and photographed subjects and conceived the use of data pertaining to the first phase of thesis (not published as thesis or article) to compare male/female norms. VR conceived the use of first phase data for male/female and inter-ethnic comparisons, searched the literature, collected published norms of other countries, statistically compared the measurements between males and females and between Iranians with other countries, prepared the figures and tables, and drafted/revised the article. FKO participated in literature search and article revision.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Bayat M, Shariati M, Rajaeirad F, Yekaninejad MS, Momen-heravi F, Davoudmanesh Z (2016) Facial anthropometric norms of the young Iranian population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 1–8Google Scholar
- 10.Brons R (1998) Facial harmony: standard for orthognathic surgery and orthodontics. Quintessence publishing Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Scavone H Jr, Trevisan H Jr, Garib DG, Ferreira FV (2006) Facial profile evaluation in Japanese-Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129(721):e1–e5Google Scholar
- 22.Al-Gunaid T, Yamada K, Yamaki M, Saito I (2007) Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 132(576):e7–e14Google Scholar
- 24.Oh HS, Korn EL, Zhang X, Liu Y, Xu T, Boyd R et al (2009) Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 136(762):e1–e14 (Discussion 3) Google Scholar
- 26.Amini F, Rakhshan V, Babaei P (2012) Prevalence and pattern of hypodontia in the permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 9:245–250Google Scholar
- 27.Amini F, Rakhshan V, Jamalzadeh S (2013) Prevalence and pattern of accessory teeth (hyperdontia) in permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients. Iran J Public HealthGoogle Scholar
- 28.Rakhshan V (2013) Meta-analysis and systematic review of congenitally missing teeth in permanent dentition: Prevalence and biasing factors. Prog OrthodGoogle Scholar