Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 93–99 | Cite as

Soft Tissue Changes Following Combined Anterior Segmental Bimaxillary Orthognathic Procedures

  • Sanjay Kumar Bhagat
  • Sankar Kannan
  • M. R. Ramesh Babu
  • Thiru Murugan kanagasabapathy
  • Manoj Kumar Jain
  • C. Ramesh
  • Anu Radha
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Aims & objectives

To analyze the soft tissue response in patients treated by combined anterior segmental bimaxillary procedures.

Methods

A  Prospective, observational and analytical study was carried out for a period of 2 years involving 37 patients with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria; lateral cephalograms were taken by the same operator on the standardized unit immediately before and 6 months after surgery; hard and soft tissue landmarks were measured in millimeters to both horizontal and vertical reference lines; any differences in distances were recorded as a surgical change; appropriate statistical test was carried; level of significance was p < 0.05.

Results

All patients underwent anterior maxillary osteotomy with 34 anterior mandibular osteotomies, 2 advancement genioplasties and 1 reduction genioplasty. Analysis showed significant angular, horizontal and vertical change. The significant differences in skeletal variables were observed in N–Pg distance, overjet, overbite, U1–NF angle, L1–Mp angle and soft tissue variables like labiomental angle, upper–lower lip protrusion, upper–lower lip length and lower incisor to labrale inferius distance. Nasolabial angle, interlabial gap and upper incisor exposure were extremely significant.

Conclusion

Soft tissue response to surgery is perhaps more predictable after 6 months, so this may be a treatment modality of choice in adult bimaxillary/dentoalveolar protrusion patients who need instant esthetic facial results.

Keywords

Soft tissue response Orthognathic surgery Bimaxillary segmental osteotomy Bimaxillary protrusion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical and research committee mahatma Gandhi post graduate institute of dental sciences puducherry Pondicherry India.

References

  1. 1.
    Altug-Atac AT, Bolatoglu H, Memikoglu UT (2007) Facial soft tissue profile following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 78(1):50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayoub AF, Mostafa YA, el-Mofty S (1991) Soft tissue response to anterior maxillary osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 6(3):183–190Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell WH, Dann J III (1973) Correction of dentofacial deformities by surgery in the anterior part of the jaws: a study of stability and soft tissue changes. Am J Orthod 64:162–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burstone CJ, Park YC (1986) Soft tissue profile the fallacies of hard tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 90:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burstone CJ (1967) Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burstone CJ, James RB et al (1978) Cephalometric for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surgery 36:269–277Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burstone CJ, Legan HL (1980) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 33:774–782Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chew MT (2005) Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients. Angle Orthod 75(6):959–963Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chew MT, Sandham A, Wong HB (2008) Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(5):665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enacar A, Ugur Taner T, Toroglu S (1999) Analysis of soft tissue profile changes associated with mandibular setback and double-jaw surgeries. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14:27–35Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ewing M, Ross RB (1992) Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty. Am J Orthod 101(6):550–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freihofer HJ (1977) Changes in nasal profile after maxillary advancement in cleft and non-cleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg 5:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freihofer HJ (1976) The lip profile after correction of retromaxillism in cleft and noncleft patients. J Maxillofac Surg 4:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hack GA, de Molvan Otterloo J, Nanda R (1993) Long term stability and prediction of soft tissue changes after LeFort I surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104:544–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jensen AC, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM (1992) Soft tissue changes associated with double jaw surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101(3):266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim JR, Seong WS et al (2002) A retrospective analysis of 20 surgically corrected bimaxillary protrusion patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 17(1):23–27Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lew KK, Loh FC, Yeo JF et al (1989) Profile changes following anterior subapical osteotomy in Chinese adults with bimaxillary protrusion. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 4(3):189–196Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lew KK (1989) Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with Begg appliance. Eur J Orthod 11:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lines PA, Steinhauser E (1974) Soft tissue changes in relationship to movement of hard tissue structures in orthognathic surgery: a preliminary report. J Oral Surg 32:891–896Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nadkarni PG (1986) Soft tissue profile changes associated with orthognathic surgery for bimaxillary protrusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(11):851–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Reilly M (1989) Integumental profile changes after surgical orthodontic correction of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in black patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Okudaira M, Kawamoto T, Ono T (2008) Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxillary osteotomy: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 12(3):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park JU, Hwang YS (2008) Evaluation of the soft and hard tissue changes after anterior segmental osteotomy on the maxilla and mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(1):98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quast DC, Biggerstaff R, Haley JV (1983) The short term and long-term soft-tissue profile changes accompanying mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod 84:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Speidel TM, Marine KM, Worms FW (1979) Soft tissue changes associated with mandibular subapical osteotomy. Angle Orthod 49(1):56–64Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay Kumar Bhagat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sankar Kannan
    • 1
  • M. R. Ramesh Babu
    • 1
  • Thiru Murugan kanagasabapathy
    • 1
  • Manoj Kumar Jain
    • 1
  • C. Ramesh
    • 1
  • Anu Radha
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryMahatma Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences GorimeduPondicherryIndia
  2. 2.Face Max Dental and Maxillofacial CentreJammu TawiIndia
  3. 3.Clinical PsychologyDelhi UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations