Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 142–149 | Cite as

Infection, Alveolar Osteitis, and Adverse Effects Using Metronidazole in Healthy Patients Undergoing Third Molar Surgery: A Meta-analysis

  • Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
  • Othoniel H. Aragon-Martinez
  • Ronell E. Bollogna-Molina
  • Ángel J. Alonso-Castro
Review Article
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the risk of surgical infection, alveolar osteitis, and adverse effects using systemic metronidazole in comparison with placebo in healthy patients undergoing third molar surgery.

Materials and Methods

The eligible reports were identified from diverse science sources. Clinical trials meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and an acceptable Oxford Quality Score were included in this study. The evaluation of risk was done using the Risk Reduction Calculator and Review Manager 5.3., from the Cochrane Library. A significant risk reduction was assumed when the upper limit of the 95% confidence intervals was <1 and the lower limit did not cross zero (negative number) alongside a p value of <0.05 for the overall test. Data of 667 patients from five clinical trials were used for the assessment of risk.

Results

Our analysis showed no reduction of the risk of infection or dry socket in patients receiving metronidazole compared to whom took placebo. Meanwhile, the adverse effects did not exhibit a difference between the studied groups.

Conclusion

The routine use of systemic metronidazole to prevent surgical site infection and/or dry socket in healthy patients undergoing third molar surgery is not recommended.

Keywords

Metronidazole Third molar surgery Surgical infection Alveolar osteitis Adverse effects 

References

  1. 1.
    Olojede OA, Gbotolorun OM, Ibikunle AA et al (2014) A comparative clinical evaluation of the effect of preoperative and postoperative antimicrobial therapy on postoperative sequelae after impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Res 5:e2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olusanya AA, Arotiba JT, Fasola OA et al (2011) Prophylaxis versus pre-emptive antibiotics in third molar surgery: a randomised control study. Niger Postgrad Med J 18:105–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lloyd CJ, Earl PD (1994) Metronidazole: two or three times daily–a comparative controlled clinical trial of the efficacy of two different dosing schedules of metronidazole for chemoprophylaxis following third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:165–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sekhar CH, Narayanan V, Baig MF (2001) Role of antimicrobials in third molar surgery: prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:134–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pasupathy S, Alexander M (2011) Antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg 22:551–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergdahl M, Hedström L (2004) Metronidazole for the prevention of dry socket after removal of partially impacted mandibular third molar: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:555–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ritzau M, Hillerup S, Branebjerg PE et al (1992) Does metronidazole prevent alveolitis sicca dolorosa? A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21:299–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaziro GS (1984) Metronidazole (Flagyl) and Arnica montana in the prevention of post-surgical complications, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:42–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rohit S, Reddy BP (2014) Efficacy of postoperative prophylactic antibiotic therapy in third molar surgery. J Clin Diagn Res 8:ZC14–ZC16Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barclay JK (1987) Metronidazole and dry socket: prophylactic use in mandibular third molar removal complicated by non-acute pericoronitis. N Z Dent J 83:71–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Rousan M, Mukatash G, Alfar M et al (2011) The use of antibiotics after mandibular third molar surgery—is it useful in preventing post extraction complications? JMRS 18:47–51Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oomens MA, Forouzanfar T (2012) Antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:e5–e12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marcussen KB, Laulund AS, Jørgensen HL et al (2016) A systematic review on effect of single-dose preoperative antibiotics at surgical osteotomy extraction of lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:693–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren YF, Malmstrom HS (2007) Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1909–1921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lodi G, Figini L, Sardella A et al (2012) Antibiotics to prevent complications following tooth extractions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD003811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isiordia-Espinoza MA, Aragon-Martinez OH, Martínez-Morales JF et al (2015) Risk of wound infection and safety profile of amoxicillin in healthy patients which required third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:796–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Isiordia-Espinoza MA, Pozos-Guillén AJ, Aragon-Martinez OH (2014) Analgesic efficacy and safety of single-dose tramadol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in operations on the third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:775–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Higgins JP, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
  21. 21.
    Whitley E, Ball J (2002) Statistics review 3: hypothesis testing and P values. Crit Care 6:222–225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hedström L (1990) Effect of metronidazole on development of dry socket following removal of lower third molars. Tandlakartidningen 82(4):6–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xue ZX, Mao TQ (1993) Using metronidazole and hydroxyapatite for preventing dry socket after extraction of impacted mandibular 3rd molar. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2:1–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramos E, Santamaría J, Santamaría G et al (2016) Do systemic antibiotics prevent dry socket and infection after third molar extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 122:403–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Adde CA, Soares MS, Romano MM et al (2012) Clinical and surgical evaluation of the indication of postoperative antibiotic prescription in third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:s26–s31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lacasa JM, Jiménez JA, Ferrás V et al (2007) Prophylaxis versus pre-emptive treatment for infective and inflammatory complications of surgical third molar removal: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial with sustained release amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (1000/62.5 mg). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:321–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arora A, Roychoudhury A, Bhutia O, Pandey S, Singh S, Das BK (2014) Antibiotics in third molar extraction; are they really necessary: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 5:166–171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sane VD, Gadre KS, Chandan S, Halli R, Saddiwal R, Kadam P (2014) Is post-operative antibiotic therapy justified for surgical removal of mandibular third molar? A comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 13:189–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prajapati A, Prajapati A, Sathaye S (2016) Benefits of not prescribing prophylactic antibiotics after third molar surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 15:217–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aragon-Martinez OH, Isiordia-Espinoza MA, Tejeda Nava FJ et al (2016) Dental care professionals should avoid the administration of amoxicillin in healthy patients during third molar surgery: is antibiotic resistance the only problem? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1512–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
    • 1
  • Othoniel H. Aragon-Martinez
    • 2
  • Ronell E. Bollogna-Molina
    • 3
  • Ángel J. Alonso-Castro
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de Investigación, Escuela de OdontologíaUniversidad Cuauhtémoc plantel San LuisSan Luis PotosíMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíSan Luis PotosíMexico
  3. 3.Departamento de Investigación, Facultad de OdontologíaUniversidad de la República (UDELAR)MontevideoUruguay
  4. 4.División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Departamento de FarmaciaUniversidad de GuanajuatoGuanajuatoMexico

Personalised recommendations