Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 23–29 | Cite as

The Safety and Effectiveness of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery as an Alternative to General Anesthesia in Selective Cases: A Clinical Study

  • Tajamul Ahmad HakimEmail author
  • Ajaz Ahmad Shah
  • Zahoor Teli
  • Shahid Farooq
  • Shamina Kosar
  • Mubashir Younis
Clinical Paper



To assess the safety and effectiveness of superficial cervical plexus (SCP) block in oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMFS) practice as an alternative to general anesthesia in selective cases.

Subjects and Methods

The total number of patients was 10, out of which 6 were male and 4 were female patients. Five patients had incision and drainage of perimandibular space infections, two patients had enucleation of cyst in the body of mandible, one patient had open reduction and internal fixation isolated angle fracture, and two patients had submandibular lymph node biopsies. Informed & written consent were obtained from the patients after they had the procedure explained to them. Medically compromised patients and those who were excessively anxious and apprehensive, patient who did not want the procedure to be done under regional anesthesia, and patients with a history of allergy to local anesthetic were excluded. All patients had their surgical procedures under regional anesthesia (SCP block with supplemental nerve blocks) performed by the same surgeon under the supervision of anesthesiologist with continuous monitoring.


SCP block with concomitant mandibular nerve and long buccal nerve block has a high success rate, low complication rate, and high patient acceptability as shown in the study.


Superficial cervical plexus block anesthesia is a safe and useful anesthetic technique with the low risk of accidents and complications, thus a good alternative for regional anesthesia in selected cases in oral and maxillofacial surgery.


Regional anesthesia Superficial cervical plexus block Incision & drainage Lymph node biopsy 


  1. 1.
    Roger D (1995) Superficial and deep cervical plexus block: technical considerations. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesth 63(3):235–243Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kamal Kanthan R (2016) The use of superficial cervical plexus block in oral and maxillofacial surgical practice as an alternative to general anesthesia in selective cases. Ann Maxillofac Surg 6(1):4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suresh S, Templeton L (2004) Superficial cervical plexus block for vocal cord surgery in an awake pediatric patient. Anesth Analg 98:1656–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pandit JJ, McLaren ID, Crider B (1999) Efficacy and safety of the superficial cer vical plexus block for carotid erar terectomy. Br J Anaesth 83:970–972Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saxe AW, Brown E, Hamburger SW (1988) Thyroid and parathyroid surgery performed with patient under regional anesthesia. Surgery 103:415–420Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shteif M, Lesmes D, Hartman G, Ruffino S, Laster Z (2008) The use of the superficial cervical plexus block in the drainage of submandibular and submental abscesses—An alternative for general anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:2642–2645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arun K (2009) Drainage of Ludwig’ Angina under superficial cervical plexus block in pediatric patient. Anest Pediatr Neonatale 7(3):211–221Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandit JJ, Dutta D, Morris JF (2003) Spread of injectate with superficial cervical plexus block in humans: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth 91:733–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tajamul Ahmad Hakim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ajaz Ahmad Shah
    • 1
  • Zahoor Teli
    • 1
  • Shahid Farooq
    • 1
  • Shamina Kosar
    • 1
  • Mubashir Younis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryGovernment Dental College & Hospital SrinagarSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations