Advertisement

An eigendecomposition method based on deep learning and probabilistic graph model

  • Xin Li
  • Guyu Hu
  • Zhisong PanEmail author
Original Research
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

With the rapid development of computer, computer vision derived from computer vision has also made important progress in the field of image research. The extraction of image information is the most basic work in the field of image research. However, in the current environment, there is still a lack of effective methods to understand more complex image problems, such as image shape, material and illumination distribution in the environment. Eigenimage decomposition can be achieved by obtaining albedo eigenvalues and luminance eigenvalues. The color and illumination information of the image can be obtained more intuitively. Based on this, this paper proposes an intrinsic image decomposition method based on depth learning and probability graph model, in order to extract image information more accurately. Firstly, a deep convolution neural network is trained to decompose reflectivity image and shadow image. Then the conditional random field is used to optimize the reflectivity image and shadow image. The convolutional neural network designed in this paper obtains preliminary results through multi-scale architecture, deep supervision, step-by-step refinement of synthetic images and multi-stage training, which has been significantly improved compared with previous algorithms. Then the essential image and the corresponding gradient image are further optimized by conditional random field, and the eigenvalue image with richer details and clearer boundary can be obtained.

Keywords

Eigendecomposition method Deep learning Probability graph model Convolutional neural network Conditional random field 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research Development Program of China [grant number 2017YFB0802800].

References

  1. Bell S, Bala K, Suavely N (2014) Intrinsic images in the wild. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(4):159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bian Z, Tang P, Yan J (2019) Land-cover classification from multiple classifiers using decision fusion based on the probabilistic graphical model. Int J Remote Sens 40(12):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dong J (2015) Research on fast and reliable template image matching technology. National University of Defense Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. Du J (2017) Research on pixel-level multiscale medical image fusion method. Chongqing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrari D, Niks D, Yang LH et al (2003) Allosteric communication in the tryptophan synthase bienzyme complex: roles of the β-subunit aspartate 305−Arginine 141 Salt Bridge. Biochemistry 42(25):7807–7818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hao Y, Mingxin Y, Jiabin X, Lianqing Z, Tao Z, Zhihui Z (2019) Tongue squamous cell carcinoma discrimination with Raman spectroscopy and convolutional neural networks. Vib Spectrosc 103:102938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim S, Park K, Sohn K et al (2016) Unified depth prediction and intrinsicdecomposition from a single image via joint convolutional neural fields. European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer International Publishing, pp 143–159Google Scholar
  8. Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques—adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Li Y, Brown MS (2014) Single image layer separation using relative smoothness. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 2752–2759Google Scholar
  10. Liu L, Zhang J, Fu X et al (2019) Unsupervised segmentation and elm for fabric defect image classification. Multimedia Tools Appl 78(9):12421–12449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Narihira T, Maire M, Yu SX (2015) Direct intrinsic Learning albedo-shadingdecomposition by convolutional regression. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 2992–2992Google Scholar
  12. Ren Z, Wu L (2018) Hyperspectral intrinsic image decomposition based on automatic subspace partitioning. Adv Laser Optoelectron 55(10):398–404Google Scholar
  13. Roberto R-R, Edgar G, Ke P, Dang KN, Frédéric L, Philippe P, Lima-Saad WE (2019) Prediction of epileptic seizures with convolutional neural networks and functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med 111:103355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarishvili A, Winter J, Luhmann HJ, Mildenberger E (2019) Probabilistic graphical model identifies clusters of EEG patterns in recordings from neonates. Clin Neurophysiol 130(8):1342–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Science—Computational Science; Reports on Computational Science Findings from University of Milan Provide New Insights (Efficient Computational Strategies To Learn the Structure of Probabilistic Graphical Models of Cumulative Phenomena)Google Scholar
  16. Scipioni M, Giorgetti A, Latta DD et al (2018) Direct parametric maps estimation from dynamic PET data: an iterated conditional modes approach. J Healthc Eng 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shen Z, Yuan S (2019) Regional load clustering ensemble forecasting using convolutional neural network support vector regression machine. Power Grid Technol 10:15.  https://doi.org/10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2019.0759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun J, Yan H (2018) Research on expression classification method based on probability graph model. J Liaoning Univ Eng Technol (Natural Science Edition) 37(06):932–938Google Scholar
  19. Sun L, Xie J, Wang C (2019) Collection development for macao studies—a user perspective. Collect Manage 44(2):1–15Google Scholar
  20. Wang H (2016) Image-based visualization of plant leaf aging process. Shenyang Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang L, Zhong Y, Li Z, He Y (2019) On-line fabric defect detection algorithm based on in-depth learning. Comput Appl 1–6 [2019-04-01]Google Scholar
  22. Xu J (2016) Research on probabilistic diagnosis method of multi-fault program. Dalian Maritime UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu J, Zhang D, Qian W (2017) Application of probabilistic graph model in social network user similarity discovery. Comput Sci Explor 11(07):1056–1067Google Scholar
  24. Yang B (2015) Geometric feature extraction and shape restoration algorithm based on RGB-D image. Zhengzhou UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang J (2016) Image fusion algorithm based on two-dimensional empirical mode decomposition. Northwest University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhu R, Wei H, Lu Y, Sun D (2015) Research on license plate enhancement algorithm under uneven illumination. Minicomput Syst 36(03):601–604Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Army Engineering University of PLANanjingChina

Personalised recommendations