Advertisement

Neutrosophic goal programming strategy for multi-level multi-objective linear programming problem

  • Indrani Maiti
  • Tarni Mandal
  • Surapati PramanikEmail author
Original Research
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Neutrosophic set theory plays an important role in dealing with the impreciseness and inconsistency in data encountered in solving real life problems. This article aims to present a novel goal programming based strategy which will be helpful to solve Multi-Level Multi-Objective Linear Programming Problem (MLMOLPP) with parameters as neutrosophic numbers (NNs). Difficulty in decision making arises due to the presence of multiple decision makers (DMs) and impreciseness in information. Here each level DM has multiple linear objective functions with parameters considered as NNs which are represented in the form \(c + dI\), where c and d are considered real numbers and the symbol I denotes indeterminacy. The constraints are also linear with the parameters as NNs. Firstly the NNs are changed into intervals and the problem turns into a multi-level multi-objective linear programming problem considering interval parameters. Then interval programming technique is employed to obtain the target interval of each objective function. In order to avoid decision deadlock which may arise in hierarchical (multi-level) problem, a possible relaxation is imposed by each level DM on the decision variables under his/her control. Finally a goal programming strategy is presented to solve the MLMOLPP with interval parameters. The method presented in this paper facilitates to solve MLMOLPP with multiple conflicting objectives in an uncertain environment represented through NNs of the form \(c + dI\), where indeterminacy I plays a pivotal role. Lastly, a mathematical example is solved to show the novelty and applicability of the developed strategy.

Keywords

Multi-level multi-objective programming Neutrosophic number Interval programming Goal programming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author expresses her heartfelt gratitude towards Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for providing financial assistantship through Inspire fellowship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abou-El-Enien THM, El-Feky SF (2018) Compromise solutions for fuzzy multi-level multiple objective decision making problems. Am J Comput Appl Math 8(1):1–14Google Scholar
  2. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Baky IA (2010) Solving multi-level multi-objective linear programming problems through fuzzy goal programming approach. Appl Math Model 34(9):2377–2387MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Baky IA, Eid MH, Elsayed MA (2014) Bi-level multi-objective programming problem with fuzzy demands: a fuzzy goal programming algorithm. J Oper Res Soc India (OPSEARCH) 51(2):280–296MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Banaeian N, Mobli H, Fahimnia B, Nielsen IE, Omid M (2018) Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Comput Oper Res 89(C):337–347MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee D, Pramanik S (2018) Single-objective linear goal programming problem with neutrosophic numbers. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol 7:454–469Google Scholar
  7. Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014a) Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:105–113Google Scholar
  8. Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014b) A new methodology for neutrosophic multi-attribute decision-making with unknown weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 3:42–50Google Scholar
  9. Broumi S, Smarandache F (2014) Single valued neutrosophic trapezoid linguistic aggregation operators based multi-attribute decision making. Bull Pure Appl Sci Math Stat 33E(2):135–155Google Scholar
  10. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Ferguson A (1955) Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Manag Sci 1(2):138–151MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey PP, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014a) Multilevel fractional programming problem based on fuzzy goal programming. Int J Innov Res Tech Sci 2:17–26Google Scholar
  12. Dey PP, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014b) TOPSIS approach to linear fractional bi-level MODM problem based on fuzzy goal programming. J Ind Eng Int 10(4):173–184Google Scholar
  13. Emam OE, Abdo AM, Bekhit NM (2016) A multi-level multi-objective quadratic programming problem with fuzzy parameters in constraints. Int J Eng Res Dev 12(4):50–57Google Scholar
  14. Kong L, Wu Y, Ye J (2015) Misfire fault diagnosis method of gasoline engines using the cosine similarity measure of neutrosophic numbers. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 8:42–45Google Scholar
  15. Lachhwani K (2014) On solving multi-level multi objective linear programming problems through fuzzy goal programming approach. Opsearch 51(4):624–637MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu P, Liu X (2018) The neutrosophic number generalized weighted power averaging operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(2):347–358Google Scholar
  17. Liu QM, Yang YM (2018) Interactive programming approach for solving multi-level multi-objective linear programming problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(1):55–61Google Scholar
  18. Liu P, Liu J, Merigó JM (2018) Partitioned Heronian means based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 62:395–422Google Scholar
  19. Liu S, Zhang DG, Liu XH, Zhang T, Gao JX, Cui YY (2019) Dynamic analysis for the average shortest path length of mobile ad hoc networks under random failure scenarios. IEEE Access 7:21343–21358Google Scholar
  20. Mondal K, Pramanik S (2015) Neutrosophic decision making model of school choice. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 7:62–68Google Scholar
  21. Mondal K, Pramanik S, Giri BC, Smarandache F (2018) NN-Harmonic mean aggregation operators-based MCGDM strategy in a neutrosophic number environment. Axioms.  https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms7010012 Google Scholar
  22. Moore RE (1998) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  23. Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Peng Y, Torres-Albero C, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Analysing discussions in social networks using group decision making methods and sentiment analysis. Inf Sci 447:157–168Google Scholar
  24. Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Samuylov K, Ureña R, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Carrying out consensual Group Decision Making processes under social networks using sentiment analysis over comparative expressions. Knowl Based Syst 165:335–345Google Scholar
  25. Osman MS, Emam OE, El Sayed MA (2017) Stochastic fuzzy multi-level multi-objective fractional programming problem: a FGP approach. Opsearch 54(4):816–840MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Osman MS, Emam OE, El Sayed MA (2018) Solving multi-level multi-objective fractional programming problems with fuzzy demands via FGP approach. Int J Appl Comput Math 4:41MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Inf Sci 459:20–35Google Scholar
  28. Pramanik S (2012) Bilevel programming problem with fuzzy parameters: a fuzzy goal programming approach. J Appl Quant Methods 7(1):9–24Google Scholar
  29. Pramanik S, Banerjee D (2018) Neutrosophic number goal programming for multi-objective linear programming problem in neutrosophic number environment. MOJ Res Rev 1(3):135–141Google Scholar
  30. Pramanik S, Chakrabarti SN (2013) A study on problems of construction workers in West Bengal based on neutrosophic cognitive maps. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2(11):6387–6394Google Scholar
  31. Pramanik S, Dey PP (2011) Bi-level linear fractional programming problem based on fuzzy goal programming approach. Int J Comput Appl 25(11):34–40Google Scholar
  32. Pramanik S, Dey PP (2018) Bi-level linear programming problem with neutrosophic numbers. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 21:110–121Google Scholar
  33. Pramanik S, Dey PP, Roy TK (2012) Fuzzy goal programming approach to linear fractional bilevel decentralized programming problem based on Taylor series approximation. J Fuzzy Math 20:231–238MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Pramanik S, Banerjee D, Giri BC (2015) Multi-level multi-objective linear plus linear fractional programming problem based on FGP approach. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 2(5):171–177Google Scholar
  35. Pramanik S, Roy R, Roy TK (2017) Teacher selection strategy based on bidirectional projection measure in neutrosophic number environment. In: Smarandache F, Abdel-Basset M, El-Henawy I (eds) Neutrosophic operational research, vol 2. Pons Publishing House/Pons asbl, Bruxelles, pp 29–53Google Scholar
  36. Ramadan K (1996) Linear programming with interval coefficients. Doctoral dissertation, Carleton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaocheng T (1994) Interval number and fuzzy number linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst 66(3):301–306MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi L, Ye J (2017) Cosine measures of linguistic neutrosophic numbers and their application in multiple attribute group decision-making. Information 8(4):117.  https://doi.org/10.3390/info8040117 Google Scholar
  39. Smarandache F (1998) A unifying field in logics: neutrosophic logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic set, neutrosophic probability and statistics. American Research Press, RehobothzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Smarandache F (2013) Introduction of neutrosophic statistics. Sitech and Education Publisher, CraiovazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Smarandache F (2015) (t, i, f)-Neutrosophic structures & I-neutrosophic structures (revisited). Neutrosophic Sets Syst 8:3–9Google Scholar
  42. Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistruct 4:410–413zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Ye J (2016a) Multiple attribute group decision making method under neutrosophic number environment. J Intell Syst 25(3):377–386Google Scholar
  44. Ye J (2016b) Fault diagnoses of steam turbine using the exponential similarity measure of neutrosophic numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30(4):1927–1934zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Ye J (2017) Bidirectional projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with neutrosophic numbers. Neural Comput Appl 28(5):1021–1029Google Scholar
  46. Ye J (2018a) Neutrosophic number linear programming method and its application under neutrosophic number environments. Soft Comput 22(14):4639–4646Google Scholar
  47. Ye J (2018b) Multiple attribute decision-making methods based on the expected value and the similarity measure of hesitant neutrosophic linguistic numbers. Cogn Comput 10(3):454–463Google Scholar
  48. Ye J, Chen J, Yong R, Du S (2017) Expression and analysis of joint roughness coefficient using neutrosophic number functions. Information 8(2):69.  https://doi.org/10.3390/info8020069 Google Scholar
  49. Ye J, Cui W, Lu Z (2018) Neutrosophic number nonlinear programming problems and their general solution methods under neutrosophic number environments. Axioms 7(1):13.  https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms7010013 Google Scholar
  50. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang DG (2012) A new approach and system for attentive mobile learning based on seamless migration. Appl Intell 36(1):75–89Google Scholar
  52. Zhang DG, Liang YP (2013) A kind of novel method of service-aware computing for uncertain mobile applications. Math Comput Model 57(3–4):344–356Google Scholar
  53. Zhang DG, Zhang XD (2012) Design and implementation of embedded un-interruptible power supply system (EUPSS) for web-based mobile application. Enterp Inf Syst 6(4):473–489Google Scholar
  54. Zhang DG, Kang X, Wang J (2012a) A novel image de-noising method based on spherical coordinates system. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2012:110Google Scholar
  55. Zhang D, Zhao CP, Liang YP, Liu ZJ (2012b) A new medium access control protocol based on perceived data reliability and spatial correlation in wireless sensor network. Comput Electr Eng 38(3):694–702Google Scholar
  56. Zhang DG, Zhu YN, Zhao CP, Dai WB (2012c) A new constructing approach for a weighted topology of wireless sensor networks based on local-world theory for the Internet of Things (IOT). Comput Math Appl 64(5):1044–1055zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang DG, Li G, Zheng K, Ming X, Pan ZH (2014a) An energy-balanced routing method based on forward-aware factor for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(1):766–773Google Scholar
  58. Zhang DG, Wang X, Song X, Zhao D (2014b) A novel approach to mapped correlation of ID for RFID anti-collision. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 7:741–748Google Scholar
  59. Zhang DG, Wang X, Song XD (2015a) New medical image fusion approach with coding based on SCD in wireless sensor network. J Electr Eng Technol 10(6):2384–2392Google Scholar
  60. Zhang DG, Wang X, Song XD, Zhang T, Zhu YN (2015b) A new clustering routing method based on PECE for WSN. EURASIP J Wirel Commun 2015:162Google Scholar
  61. Zhang DG, Zheng K, Zhang T, Wang X (2015c) A novel multicast routing method with minimum transmission for WSN of cloud computing service. Soft Comput 19(7):1817–1827Google Scholar
  62. Zhang DG, Zheng K, Zhao DX, Song XD, Wang X (2016) Novel quick start (QS) method for optimization of TCP. Wirel Netw 22(1):211–222Google Scholar
  63. Zhang DG, Liu S, Zhang T, Liang Z (2017a) Novel unequal clustering routing protocol considering energy balancing based on network partition and distance for mobile education. J Netw Comput Appl 88:1–9Google Scholar
  64. Zhang DG, Niu HL, Liu S (2017b) Novel PEECR-based clustering routing approach. Soft Comput 21(24):7313–7323Google Scholar
  65. Zhang DG, Chen C, Cui YY, Zhang T (2018a) New method of energy efficient subcarrier allocation based on evolutionary game theory. Mobile Netw Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1123-y Google Scholar
  66. Zhang DG, Liu S, Liu XH, Zhang T, Cui YY (2018b) Novel dynamic source routing protocol (DSR) based on genetic algorithm-bacterial foraging optimization (GA-BFO). Int J Commun Syst 31(18):1–20Google Scholar
  67. Zhang DG, Tang YM, Cui YY, Gao JX, Liu XH, Zhang T (2018c) Novel reliable routing method for engineering of internet of vehicles based on graph theory. Eng Comput 36(1):226–247Google Scholar
  68. Zhang DG, Zhang T, Dong Y, Liu XH, Cui YY, Zhao DX (2018d) Novel optimized link state routing protocol based on quantum genetic strategy for mobile learning. J Netw Comput Appl 122:37–49Google Scholar
  69. Zhang DG, Zhang T, Zhang J, Dong Y, Zhang XD (2018e) A kind of effective data aggregating method based on compressive sensing for wireless sensor network. J Wirel Comput Netw 2018:159Google Scholar
  70. Zhang DG, Zhou S, Tang YM (2018f) A low duty cycle efficient MAC protocol based on self-adaption and predictive strategy. Mobile Netw Appl 23(4):828–839Google Scholar
  71. Zhang DG, Gao JX, Liu XH, Zhang T, Zhao DX (2019a) Novel approach of distributed and adaptive trust metrics for MANET. Wirel Netw 25(6):3587–3603Google Scholar
  72. Zhang DG, Ge H, Zhang T, Cui YY, Liu X, Mao G (2019b) New multi-hop clustering algorithm for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20:1517–1530Google Scholar
  73. Zhang DG, Zhang T, Liu X (2019c) Novel self-adaptive routing service algorithm for application in VANET. Appl Intell 49(5):1866–1879Google Scholar
  74. Zhang T, Zhang DG, Qiu J, Zhang X, Zhao P, Gong C (2019d) A kind of novel method of power allocation with limited cross-tier interference for CRN. IEEE Access 7:82571–82583Google Scholar
  75. Zheng E, Teng F, Liu P (2017) Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on neutrosophic number generalized hybrid weighted averaging operator. Neural Comput Appl 28(8):2063–2074Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Institute of TechnologyJamshedpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsNandalal Ghosh B.T. CollegeKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations