Advertisement

Journal of Visualization

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Flow visualization using a Sanderson prism

  • Jennifer Schulz
  • Beric SkewsEmail author
  • Alessandro Filippi
Regular Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The use of a Sanderson prism for the visualization of density gradients in a compressible flow is shown to be an inexpensive and versatile substitute for Wollaston prisms in the application of shearing interferometry. Experimentation using the Sanderson prism in a schlieren optical setup was performed to examine the effectiveness of the prism’s use for flow visualization. A range of polycarbonate prisms were tested for a range of prism heights and different physical deflections to produce a range of divergence angles. For each prism height and deflection, tests were done using a hair dryer, helium jet, a soldering iron and a moving shock wave interaction to generate flow density gradients. The light which passes through the prism was also focused at different distances to determine the effects that different fringe arrangements have on the visibility of the flow. Tests were also done comparing horizontal and vertical fringe arrangements. It was found that the colour of the infinite fringe selected had an influence on the results because the larger the difference in colour between that of the adjacent fringes, the better the contrast in the final result. It was also found that infinite fringe use showed better results due to flow features such as shocks and vortices being more easily identified against a uniform background. It is shown that the technique produces good visualization of the density gradients that form in the flow.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Compressible flow Schlieren interferometry Density gradients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the support of the South African National Research Foundation.

References

  1. Biss MM, Settles GS, Staymates ME, Sanderson SR (2008) Differential schlieren-interferometry with a simple adjustable Wollaston-like prism. Appl Opt 47(3):328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlomagno GM (1986) A Wollaston prism interferometer used as a reference beam interferometer. In: Veret C (ed) Flow visualization IV. Hemisphere Press, Washington, pp 105–110Google Scholar
  3. Desse JM, Pegneaux JC (1993) Direct measurement of the density field using high speed differential interferometry. Exp Fluids 15:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Merzkirch W (2012) Flow visualization, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Sanderson SR (2005) Simple, adjustable beam splitting element for differential interferometers based on photoelastic birefringence of a prismatic bar. Rev Sci Instrum 76:113703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Skews BW (1967) The perturbed region behind a diffracting shock wave. J Fluid Mech 29:705–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smits AJ, Lim TT (2012) Flow visualization, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Schulz
    • 1
  • Beric Skews
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandro Filippi
    • 1
  1. 1.Flow Research Unit, School of Mechanical, Industrial and Aeronautical EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations