Advertisement

Journal of Visualization

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 569–583 | Cite as

Three-dimensional particle behavior using defocusing method in micro-toroidal vortex generated by optoelectrokinetic flow

  • Dong Kim
  • Yining Ma
  • Kyung Chun Kim
Regular Paper
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a technique to realize multiphysics simulation and experimental validation of micro-toroidal vortex and utilizing the defocusing method to obtain the three-dimensional particles trajectory using a single camera. Fluorescent polystyrene particles were suspended at a concentration of 3.7 × 108 count mL−1 solution diluted with DI water. These were carried by the toroidal vortex fluid motion and showed an optoelectrokinetic phenomenon. We used a defocusing method to trace the three-dimensional trajectory of the particles. The size of the ring pattern increased as particles moved far away from the focusing plane and close to the objective lens. By recording the ring pattern size of one particle in every continuous frame, we successfully implemented the described techniques to obtain the three-dimensional trajectory of particles in an optoelectrokinetic experiment. Simulation results in COMSOL® Multiphysics (v4.3a) were compared to the trajectory and particle velocity variation in the experiment.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Optoelectrokinetic Multiphysics simulation Defocusing method Three-dimensional trajectory Micro-toroidal vortex 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) through GCRC-SOP (No. 2011-0030013).

References

  1. Backstrom G (1999) Fluid dynamics by finite element analysis. Studentlitteratur, LundzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Batchelor GK (2000) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castellanos A, Ramos A, Gonzalez A, Green NG, Morgan H (2003) Electrohydrodynamics and dielectrophoresis in microsystems: scaling laws. J Phys D 36(20):2584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Green NG, Ramos A, González A, Castellanos A, Morgan H (2000) Electric field induced fluid flow on microelectrodes: the effect of illumination. J Phys D 33(2):L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green NG, Ramos A, Gonzalez A, Castellanos A, Morgan H (2001) Electrothermally induced fluid flow on microelectrodes. J Electrost 53(2):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoettges KF, McDonnell MB, Hughes MP (2003) Use of combined dielectrophoretic/electrohydrodynamic forces for biosensor enhancement. J Phys D 36(20):L101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivory CF, Srivastava SK (2011) Direct current dielectrophoretic simulation of proteins using an array of circular insulating posts. Electrophoresis 32(17):2323–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim D, Shim J, Chuang HS, Kim KC (2015) Numerical simulation on the opto–electro-kinetic patterning for rapid concentration of particles in a microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 9(3):034102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar A, Williams SJ, Wereley ST (2009) Experiments on opto-electrically generated microfluidic vortices. Microfluid Nanofluid 6(5):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar A, Kwon JS, Williams SJ, Green NG, Yip NK, Wereley ST (2010) Optically modulated electrokinetic manipulation and concentration of colloidal particles near an electrode surface. Langmuir 26(7):5262–5272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar A, Cierpka C, Williams SJ, Kähler CJ, Wereley ST (2011a) 3D3C velocimetry measurements of an electrothermal microvortex using wavefront deformation PTV and a single camera. Microfluid Nanofluid 10(2):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar A, Williams SJ, Chuang HS, Green NG, Wereley ST (2011b) Hybrid opto-electric manipulation in microfluidics—opportunities and challenges. Lab Chip 11(13):2135–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwon JS, Wereley ST (2015) Light-actuated electrothermal microfluidic motion: experimental investigation and physical interpretation. Microfluid Nanofluid 19(3):609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwon JS, Ravindranath S, Kumar A, Irudayaraj J, Wereley ST (2010) Application of an optically induced electrokinetic manipulation technique on live bacteria. In: ASME 2010 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p 815–821Google Scholar
  15. Kwon JS, Ravindranath SP, Kumar A, Irudayaraj J, Wereley ST (2012) Opto–electrokinetic manipulation for high-performance on-chip bioassays. Lab Chip 12(23):4955–4959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Min YU, Kim KC (2011) Hybrid micro-/nano-particle image velocimetry for 3D3C multi-scale velocity field measurement in microfluidics. Meas Sci Technol 22(6):064001MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishra A, Kwon JS, Thakur R, Wereley S (2014) Optoelectrical microfluidics as a promising tool in biology. Trends Biotechnol 32(8):414–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mizuno A, Nishioka M, Ohno Y, Dascalescu LD (1995) Liquid microvortex generated around a laser focal point in an intense high-frequency electric field. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 31(3):464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramos A, Morgan H, Green NG, Castellanos A (1998) AC electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures. J Phys D 31(18):2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang KC, Kumar A, Williams SJ, Green NG, Kim KC, Chuang HS (2014) An optoelectrokinetic technique for programmable particle manipulation and bead-based biosignal enhancement. Lab Chip 14(20):3958–3967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Willert CE, Gharib M (1992) Three-dimensional particle imaging with a single camera. Exp Fluids 12(6):353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams SJ, Kumar A, Wereley ST (2008) Electrokinetic patterning of colloidal particles with optical landscapes. Lab Chip 8(11):1879–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams SJ, Kumar A, Green NG, Wereley ST (2009) Optically induced electrokinetic concentration and sorting of colloids. J Micromech Microeng 20(1):015022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams SJ, Park C, Wereley ST (2010) Advances and applications on microfluidic velocimetry techniques. Microfluid Nanofluid 8(6):709–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wood NR, Wolsiefer AI, Cohn RW, Williams SJ (2013) Dielectrophoretic trapping of nanoparticles with an electrokinetic nanoprobe. Electrophoresis 34(13):1922–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu M, Roberts JW, Buckley M (2005) Three-dimensional fluorescent particle tracking at micron-scale using a single camera. Exp Fluids 38(4):461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoon SY, Kim KC (2006) 3D particle position and 3D velocity field measurement in a microvolume via the defocusing concept. Meas Sci Technol 17(11):2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityPusanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations