Application of Mn–Fe Composite Oxides Loaded on Alumina as Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Gasification

  • Zhihao Chen
  • Yanfen LiaoEmail author
  • Guicai Liu
  • Fei Mo
  • Xiaoqian Ma
Original Paper


The reactivity of oxygen carriers is curial for biomass chemical looping gasification (CLG) process. In this work, Mn–Fe composite oxides were loaded on Al2O3 through sol–gel combustion synthesis to improve their reactivity. The feasibility of these composite oxygen carriers for straw CLG process was proved in a thermogravimetric analyzer and better recyclability was found from oxygen carriers with Al2O3. Fixed-bed tests showed that the addition of Al2O3 could enhance the stability at relatively high temperature but decrease the oxygen transfer ability when temperature was low. Mn–Fe composite oxide with 60 wt% Al2O3 was chosen as the ideal oxygen carrier and the optimum condition was temperature at 850 °C, steam flow of 0.0432 g/min and OC/C mole ratio of 0.2. Under these parameters, gasification efficiency and carbon conversion efficiency reached 92.93% and 94.52% respectively. Moreover, cyclic experiments indicated that Al2O3 enhanced the stability of Mn–Fe composite oxides and gasification efficiency was decreased by 1.96% after 10 cycles. It was contributed to the porous structure supported by Al2O3, which could improve the sintering resistance and lattice oxygen transmission ability.

Graphic Abstract


Biomass Chemical looping gasification Mn–Fe composite oxygen carrier Al2O3-supported 



This investigation was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676074), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization (2013A061401005).


  1. 1.
    Huang, Z., et al.: Chemical looping gasification of biomass char using iron ore as an oxygen carrier. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 17871–17883 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, Z., et al.: Investigation on gasification performance of sewage sludge using chemical looping gasification with iron ore oxygen carrier. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 25474–25491 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, Y., Liao, Y., Liu, G., Ma, X., Zhang, H.: Reactivity investigation on biomass chemical looping conversion for syngas production. J. Energy Inst. 92, 1137–1148 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qi, B., Xia, Z., Huang, G.Y., Wang, W.: Study of chemical looping co-gasification (CLCG) of coal and rice husk with an iron-based oxygen carrier via solid–solid reactions. J. Energy Inst. 92, 382–390 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayan, P., Diego, L.F.D.: Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38, 215–282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhen, H.: Synthesis gas production by chemical-looping reforming of methane using lattice oxygen. Progress Chem. 24, 1599–1609 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, L., Zhao, H., Zheng, C.: Synthesis gas generation by chemical-looping reforming of biomass with natural copper ore as oxygen carrier. Waste Biomass Valoriz 6, 81–89 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarafraz, M.M., Jafarian, M., Arjomandi, M., Nathan, G.J.: The relative performance of alternative oxygen carriers for liquid chemical looping combustion and gasification. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 16396–16407 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarafraz, M.M., Jafarian, M., Arjomandi, M., Nathan, G.J.: Potential of molten lead oxide for liquid chemical looping gasification (LCLG): a thermochemical analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 4195–4210 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, Z., et al.: Thermodynamic analysis and thermogravimetric investigation on chemical looping gasification of biomass char under different atmospheres with Fe2O3 oxygen carrier. Appl. Energy 157, 546–553 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fang, H., Zhen, H., Li, H., Zhao, Z.: Biomass direct chemical looping conversion in a fluidized bed reactor with natural hematite as an oxygen carrier. 27, 105–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adánez-Rubio, I., et al.: Chemical looping combustion of biomass: CLOU experiments with a Cu–Mn mixed oxide. Fuel Process. Technol. 172, 179–186 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmitz, M., Linderholm, C.: Chemical looping combustion of biomass in 10- and 100-kW pilots: analysis of conversion and lifetime using a sintered manganese ore. Fuel 231, 73–84 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shulman, A., Cleverstam, E., Mattisson, T., Lyngfelt, A.: Manganese/iron, manganese/nickel, and manganese/silicon oxides used in chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) for combustion of methane. Energy Fuels 23, 5269–5275 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, K., Yu, Q., Qin, Q., Hou, L., Duan, W.: Thermodynamic analysis of syngas generation from biomass using chemical looping gasification method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 10346–10353 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bazhenova, E., Honkala, K.: Screening the bulk properties and reducibility of Fe-doped Mn2O3 from first principles calculations. Catal. Today 285, 104–113 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niu, P., Ma, Y., Tian, X., Ma, J., Zhao, H.: Chemical looping gasification of biomass: part I. screening Cu–Fe metal oxides as oxygen carrier and optimizing experimental conditions. Biomass Bioenerg. 108, 146–156 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larring, Y., Braley, C., Pishahang, M., Anne Andreassen, K., Bredesen, R.: Evaluation of a mixed Fe–Mn oxide system for chemical looping combustion. Energy Fuels 29, 3438–3445 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lambert, A., et al.: Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Fe/Mn oxides for chemical looping combustion. Energy Proc. 1, 375–381 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rydén, M., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T.: Combined manganese/iron oxides as oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) in a circulating fluidized bed reactor system. Energy Proc. 4, 341–348 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qu, L.I., Qin, W., Zhang, J.J., Cheng, W.L., Dong, C.Q.: Characteristics and kinetics of chemical looping combustion of Mn-doped Fe2O3 oxygen carrier with CO. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 42, 932–937 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, B., Gao, C., Wang, W., Zhao, H., Zheng, C.: Sulfur evolution in chemical looping combustion of coal with MnFe2O4 oxygen carrier. J. Environ. Sci. 26, 1062–1070 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    San Pio, M.A., Martini, M., Gallucci, F., Roghair, I., van Sint Annaland, M.: Kinetics of CuO/SiO2 and CuO/Al2O3 oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 175, 56–71 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tijani, M.M., Aqsha, A., Mahinpey, N.: Synthesis and study of metal-based oxygen carriers (Cu Co, Fe, Ni) and their interaction with supported metal oxides (Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2, ZrO2) in a chemical looping combustion system. Energy 138, 873–882 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qin, W., et al.: The synergetic effect of metal oxide support on Fe2O3 for chemical looping combustion: A theoretical study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 282, 718–723 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Casarin, M., Falcomer, D., Glisenti, A., Vittadini, A.: Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Interaction of CO2 with α-Al2O3. Inorg. Chem. 42, 436–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kierzkowska, A.M., et al.: Development of iron oxide carriers for chemical looping combustion using Sol–Gel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 5383–5391 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yüzbasi, N.S., Kierzkowska, A., Müller, C.: Development of Fe2O3-based, Al2O3-stabilized oxygen carriers using Sol-gel technique for H2 production via chemical looping. Energy Proc. 114, 436–445 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen, J., et al.: Identifying the roles of MFe2O4 (M = Cu, Ba, Ni, and Co) in the chemical looping reforming of char, pyrolysis gas and tar resulting from biomass pyrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 4674–4687 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang, X., et al.: Pyrolysis kinetics of soybean straw using thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel 169, 93–98 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dong, Q., et al.: Pyrolysis behavior of raw/torrefied rice straw after different demineralization processes. Biomass Bioenerg. 119, 229–236 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, B., Yan, R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, C.: Mechanistic investigation of chemical looping combustion of coal with Fe2O3 oxygen carrier. Fuel 90, 2359–2366 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrew, R., et al.: Practical achievements on biomass steam gasification in a rotary tubular coiled-downdraft reactor. Waste Manag Res. 35, 818–825 (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Franco, C., Pinto, F., Gulyurtlu, I., Cabrita, I.: The study of reactions influencing the biomass steam gasification process. Fuel 82, 835–842 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu, G., Liao, Y., Wu, Y., Ma, X., Chen, L.: Characteristics of microalgae gasification through chemical looping in the presence of steam. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 22730–22742 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao, H., et al.: Characterization of natural copper ore as oxygen carrier in chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling of anthracite. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 22, 154–164 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Qin, Y.H., et al.: Characterization of tar from sawdust gasified in the pressurized fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenerg. 31, 243–249 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhou, J.S., et al.: Research on biomass-oxygen gasification in high-temperature entrained flow gasifier. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 606–611 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu, G., Liao, Y., Wu, Y., Ma, X.: Synthesis gas production from microalgae gasification in the presence of Fe2O3 oxygen carrier and CaO additive. Appl. Energy 212, 955–965 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu, G., Liao, Y., Wu, Y., Ma, X.: Enhancement of Ca2Fe2O5 oxygen carrier through Mg/Al/Zn oxide support for biomass chemical looping gasification. Energy Convers. Manage. 195, 262–273 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deng, Z., et al.: Evaluation of calcined copper slag as an oxygen carrier for chemical looping gasification of sewage sludge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 17823–17834 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang, Z., et al.: Reactivity investigation on chemical looping gasification of biomass char using nickel ferrite oxygen carrier. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 14458–14470 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    AdáNez, J., et al.: Ilmenite activation during consecutive redox cycles in chemical-looping combustion. Energy Fuels 24, 1402–1413 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mei, D., Abad, A., Zhao, H., Adánez, J., Zheng, C.: On a highly reactive Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier for in situ gasification chemical looping combustion. Energy Fuels 28, 7043–7052 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang, B., et al.: Characterization and evaluation of Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier prepared by sol–gel combustion synthesis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 91, 105–113 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang, J., Guo, Q., Liu, Y., Cheng, Y.: Preparation and characterization of Fe2O3/Al2O3 using the solution combustion approach for chemical looping combustion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 12773–12781 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Deng, J., et al.: Ultralow loading of silver nanoparticles on Mn2O3 nanowires derived with molten salts: a high-efficiency catalyst for the oxidative removal of toluene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11089–11095 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Du, X., et al.: Promotional removal of HCHO from simulated flue gas over Mn-Fe oxides modified activated coke. Appl. Catal. B 232, 37–48 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Figueiredo, N.M., Carvalho, N.J.M., Cavaleiro, A.: An XPS study of Au alloyed Al–O sputtered coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 5793–5798 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wei, G., et al.: Performance evaluation of hematite oxygen carriers in high purity hydrogen generation from cooking oil by chemical looping reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 20500–20512 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gu, H., et al.: Enhanced chemical looping hydrogen production based on biomass ash-promoted iron ore oxygen carrier. Chem. Eng. J. 360, 260–270 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhihao Chen
    • 1
  • Yanfen Liao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guicai Liu
    • 1
  • Fei Mo
    • 1
  • Xiaoqian Ma
    • 1
  1. 1.Guangdong Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization Institutes, School of Electric PowerSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations