Advertisement

Influence of Various Irradiation Time on Sono-Functionalization of Zirconia-Doped Mesoporous-Silica by Sulfuric Acid for Biofuel Production from Waste Cooking Oil

  • Sahar Dehghani
  • Mohammad HaghighiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, sulfated zirconia on MCM-41 prepared through a new ultrasound-assisted sulfation method for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. The effect of different sonication times (15, 30 and 45 min) on nanocatalyst properties were studied using BET, EDX, FESEM, NH3-TPD, FTIR and XRD analyses. The XRD patterns along with the results of FTIR and BET analysis revealed the MCM-41 framework destruction while Zr doping and sulfation of nanocatalysts. The FESEM images of the nanocatalysts illustrated a well distribution and uniform morphology for the SZM(T = 45). The size distribution of the SZM(T = 45) were subsequently determined by FESEM images. Biodiesel production carried out under following constant operational parameters to evaluate catalytic performance of synthesized samples: 5 wt% catalyst loading, 60 °C reaction temperature, methanol/oil molar ratio of 9:1 and 6 h reaction time. Using ultrasound-assisted sulfation method in nanocatalysts preparation was increased dispersion of active phase and stability of synthesized nanocatalysts. Obtained results demonstrated that longer irradiation time in nanocatalyst preparation led to higher biodiesel conversion. Additionally, after five cycles, the sonicated sample showed higher reusability compared to non-sonicated one. Among the prepared samples, the longer sonicated SZM(T = 45) nanocatalyst showed the highest conversion (93.5%) and significant stability in biodiesel production.

Graphic Abstract

Sono-sulfated zirconia nanocatalyst supported on MCM-41 was synthesized by an ultrasound-assisted impregnation/hydrothermal hybrid synthesis method. The effect of irradiation time was studied by changing time of the sonication (15, 30, 45 min) during the synthesis which led to different physiochemical properties of the nanocatalyst. It was found that, the performance of investigated nanocatalysts in biodiesel production from sunflower oil showed sonicated catalysts have higher conversion in comparison to non-sonicated catalyst. Biodiesel conversion in catalyst with 60 W and 45 min ultrasonic irradiation showed higher biodiesel conversion and also reusability in reaction environment.

Keywords

Dispersed sulfated zirconia on MCM-41 Nanocatalyst Waste cooking oil Ultrasound Irradiation time Biodiesel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We really acknowledge Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council and Sahand University of Technology for the financial support of the research.

References

  1. 1.
    Korkut, I., Bayramoglu, M.: Ultrasound assisted biodiesel production in presence of dolomite catalyst. Fuel 180, 624–629 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.101 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moradi, G.R., Dehghani, S., Khosravian, F., Arjmandzadeh, A.: The optimized operational conditions for biodiesel production from soybean oil and application of artificial neural networks for estimation of the biodiesel yield. Renew. Energy 50, 915–920 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.070 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, G., Shan, R., Ma, W., Liu, C.: The utilization of hydroxyapatite-supported CaO-CeO2 catalyst for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manage. 130, 156–164 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.052 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moghzi, F., Soleimannejad, J.: Sonochemical synthesis of a new nano-sized barium coordination polymer and its application as a heterogeneous catalyst towards sono-synthesis of biodiesel. Ultrason. Sonochem. 42, 193–200 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.023 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao, Y., Chen, Y., Gu, J., Xin, Z., Sun, S.: Butyl-biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: kinetics, fuel properties and emission performance. Fuel 236, 1489–1495 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.015 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yesilyurt, M.K.: The effects of the fuel injection pressure on the performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with waste cooking oil biodiesel-diesel blends. Renewable Energy 132, 649–666 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.024 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghaffari, A., Behzad, M.: Facile synthesis of layered sodium disilicates as efficient and recoverable nanocatalysts for biodiesel production from rapeseed oil. Adv. Powder Technol. 29(5), 1265–1271 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.02.019 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pirouzmand, M., Anakhatoon, M.M., Ghasemi, Z.: One-step biodiesel production from waste cooking oils over metal incorporated MCM-41; positive effect of template. Fuel 216, 296–300 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.138 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silva, Â., Wilson, K., Lee, A.F., dos Santos, V.C., Cons Bacilla, A.C., Mantovani, K.M., Nakagaki, S.: Nb2O5/SBA-15 catalyzed propanoic acid esterification. Appl. Catal. B 205, 498–504 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.066 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saravanan, K., Tyagi, B., Shukla, R.S., Bajaj, H.C.: Esterification of palmitic acid with methanol over template-assisted mesoporous sulfated zirconia solid acid catalyst. Appl. Catal. B 172–173, 108–115 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.014 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hosseini-Sarvari, M., Sodagar, E.: Esterification of free fatty acids (Biodiesel) using nano sulfated-titania as catalyst in solvent-free conditions. C. R. Chim. 16(3), 229–238 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2012.10.016 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Najafi Chermahini, A., Nazeri, M.: Esterification of the levulinic acid with n-butyl and isobutyl alcohols over aluminum-containing MCM-41. Fuel Process. Technol. 167, 442–450 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.07.034 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuwahara, Y., Fujitani, T., Yamashita, H.: Esterification of levulinic acid with ethanol over sulfated mesoporous zirconosilicates: influences of the preparation conditions on the structural properties and catalytic performances. Catal. Today 237, 18–28 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.008 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molaei Dehkordi, A., Ghasemi, M.: Transesterification of waste cooking oil to biodiesel using Ca and Zr mixed oxides as heterogeneous base catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 97, 45–51 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.010 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jitputti, J., Kitiyanan, B., Rangsunvigit, P., Bunyakiat, K., Attanatho, L., Jenvanitpanjakul, P.: Transesterification of crude palm kernel oil and crude coconut oil by different solid catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 116(1), 61–66 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.09.025 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    López, D.E., Goodwin Jr., J.G., Bruce, D.A., Lotero, E.: Transesterification of triacetin with methanol on solid acid and base catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 295(2), 97–105 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.055 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suwannakarn, K., Lotero, E., Goodwin, J.G.: A comparative study of gas phase esterification on solid acid catalysts. Catal. Lett. 114(3), 122–128 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9054-4 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia, C.M., Teixeira, S., Marciniuk, L.L., Schuchardt, U.: Transesterification of soybean oil catalyzed by sulfated zirconia. Biores. Technol. 99(14), 6608–6613 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.092 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luo, Y., Mei, Z., Liu, N., Wang, H., Han, C., He, S.: Synthesis of mesoporous sulfated zirconia nanoparticles with high surface area and their applies for biodiesel production as effective catalysts. Catal. Today 298, 99–108 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.047 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodrı́guez-Castellón, E., Jiménez-López, A., Maireles-Torres, P., Jones, D.J., Rozière, J., Trombetta, M., Busca, G., Lenarda, M., Storaro, L.: Textural and structural properties and surface acidity characterization of mesoporous silica-zirconia molecular sieves. J. Solid State Chem. 175(2), 159–169 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00218-4 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chatel, G.: Sonochemistry in nanocatalysis: the use of ultrasound from the catalyst synthesis to the catalytic reaction. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 15, 1–6 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.004 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tan, S.X., Lim, S., Ong, H.C., Pang, Y.L.: State of the art review on development of ultrasound-assisted catalytic transesterification process for biodiesel production. Fuel 235, 886–907 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.021 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khataee, A., Eghbali, P., Irani-Nezhad, M.H., Hassani, A.: Sonochemical synthesis of WS2 nanosheets and its application in sonocatalytic removal of organic dyes from water solution. Ultrason. Sonochem. 48, 329–339 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.06.003 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deshmane, V.G., Adewuyi, Y.G.: Mesoporous nanocrystalline sulfated zirconia synthesis and its application for FFA esterification in oils. Appl. Catal. A 462–463, 196–206 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.005 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abdulkareem-Alsultan, G., Asikin-Mijan, N., Mansir, N., Lee, H.V., Zainal, Z., Islam, A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Pyro-lytic de-oxygenation of waste cooking oil for green diesel production over Ag2O3-La2O3/AC nano-catalyst. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 137, 171–184 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.11.023 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teo, S.H., Islam, A., Chan, E.S., Thomas Choong, S.Y., Alharthi, N.H., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Awual, M.R.: Efficient biodiesel production from Jatropha curcus using CaSO4/Fe2O3-SiO2 core-shell magnetic nanoparticles. J. Clean. Prod. 208, 816–826 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.107 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teo, S.H., Islam, A., Ng, C.H., Mansir, N., Ma, T., Thomas Choong, S.Y., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Methoxy-functionalized mesostructured stable carbon catalysts for effective biodiesel production from non-edible feedstock. Chem. Eng. J. 334, 1851–1868 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.110 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Teo, S.H., Islam, A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Algae derived biodiesel using nanocatalytic transesterification process. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 111, 362–370 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.04.012 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuwahara, Y., Kang, D.-Y., Copeland, J.R., Bollini, P., Sievers, C., Kamegawa, T., Yamashita, H., Jones, C.W.: Enhanced CO2 Adsorption over Polymeric Amines Supported on Heteroatom-Incorporated SBA-15 Silica: impact of Heteroatom Type and Loading on Sorbent Structure and Adsorption Performance. Chem. Eur. J. 18(52), 16649–16664 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201203144 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuwahara, Y., Kang, D.-Y., Copeland, J.R., Brunelli, N.A., Didas, S.A., Bollini, P., Sievers, C., Kamegawa, T., Yamashita, H., Jones, C.W.: Dramatic Enhancement of CO2 Uptake by Poly(ethyleneimine) Using Zirconosilicate Supports. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(26), 10757–10760 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja303136e Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmadi, F., Haghighi, M., Ajamein, H.: Sonochemically coprecipitation synthesis of CuO/ZnO/ZrO2/Al2O3 nanocatalyst for fuel cell grade hydrogen production via steam methanol reforming. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 421, 196–208 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.05.027 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hosseini, T., Haghighi, M., Ajamein, H.: Fuel cell-grade hydrogen production from methanol over sonochemical coprecipitated copper based nanocatalyst: influence of irradiation power and time on catalytic properties and performance. Energy Convers. Manage. 126, 595–607 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.056 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rahmani Vahid, B., Haghighi, M.: Biodiesel Production from Sunflower Oil over MgO/MgAl2O4 Nanocatalyst: effect of Fuel Type on Catalyst Nanostructure and Performance. Energy Convers. Manage. 134, 290–300 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.048 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yousefi, S., Haghighi, M., Rahmani Vahid, B.: Facile and Efficient Microwave Combustion Fabrication of Mg-Spinel as Support for MgO Nanocatalyst Used in Biodiesel Production from Sunflower Oil: fuel Type Approach. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 138, 506–518 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.013 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shokrani, R., Haghighi, M., Ajamein, H., Abdollahifar, M.: Hybrid sonochemic Urea-Nitrate Combustion Preparation of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 Nanocatalyst Used in Fuel Cell Grade Hydrogen Production from Methanol: effect of Sonication and Fuel/Nitrate Ratio. Part. Sci. Technol. 36(2), 217–225 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2016.1241846 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rahmani-Vahid, B., Haghighi, M., Toghiani, J., Alaei, S.: Hybrid-coprecipitation vs. combustion synthesis of Mg-Al spinel based nanocatalyst for efficient biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 160, 220–229 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.030 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aghamohammadi, S., Haghighi, M.: Effect of template combinations (TEA/MOR, TEA/DEA, DEA/MOR) in synthesis of nanostructured CoAPSO-34 catalyst used in conversion of methanol to light olefins. Adv. Powder Technol. 27(4), 1738–1749 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.06.005 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Asghari, E., Haghighi, M., Rahmani, F.: CO2 oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene over Cr/MCM-41 nanocatalyst synthesized via hydrothermal/impregnation methods: influence of chromium content on catalytic properties and performance. J. Mol. Catal. A 418–419, 115–124 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.03.033 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taghavinezhad, P., Haghighi, M., Alizadeh, R.: Sonosynthesis of VOx/MCM-41 Nanocatalyst Enhanced by Various Metal Oxides (Mg, AL, Zr) for CO2-Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane to Ethylene. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 261, 63–78 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.10.057 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Delir Kheyrollahi Nezhad, P., Haghighi, M., Rahmani, F.: CO2/O2-enhanced ethane dehydrogenation over sol-gel synthesized Ni/ZrO2–MgO nanocatalyst: effects of MgO, ZrO2 and NiO on catalytic performance. Part. Sci. Technol. 36(8), 1017–1028 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1340376 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alaei, S., Haghighi, M., Toghiani, J., Rahmani Vahid, B.: Magnetic and reusable MgO/MgFe2O4 nanocatalyst for biodiesel production from sunflower oil: influence of fuel ratio in combustion synthesis on catalytic properties and performance. Ind. Crops Prod. 117, 322–332 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.015 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sadeghpour, P., Haghighi, M.: DEA/TEAOH templated synthesis and characterization of nanostructured NiAPSO-34 particles: effect of single and mixed templates on catalyst properties and performance in the methanol to olefin reaction. Particuology 19, 69–81 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2014.04.012 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Do, D.M., Jaenicke, S., Chuah, G.-K.: Mesoporous Zr-SBA-15 as a green solid acid catalyst for the Prins reaction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2(7), 1417–1424 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cy20084h Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tyagi, B., Sidhpuria, K.B., Shaik, B., Jasra, R.V.: Effect of Zr/Si molar ratio and sulfation on structural and catalytic properties of ZrO2–SiO2 mixed oxides. J. Porous Mater. 17(6), 699–709 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-009-9341-0 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alhassan, F.H., Yunus, R., Rashid, U., Sirat, K., Islam, A., Lee, H.V., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.: Production of biodiesel from mixed waste vegetable oils using ferric hydrogen sulphate as an effective reusable heterogeneous solid acid catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 456, 182–187 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.02.019 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shajaratun Nur, Z.A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Rabiah Nizah, M.F., Teo, S.H., Syazwani, O.N., Islam, A.: Production of biodiesel from palm oil using modified Malaysian natural dolomites. Energy Convers. Manage. 78, 738–744 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.012 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Islam, A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Chu, C.-M., Ravindra, P., Chan, E.-S.: Transesterification of palm oil using KF and NaNO3 catalysts supported on spherical millimetric γ-Al2O3. Renew. Energy 59, 23–29 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.051 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Islam, A., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Ravindra, P., Teo, S.H., Sivasangar, S., Chan, E.-S.: Biodiesel synthesis over millimetric γ-Al2O3/KI catalyst. Energy 89, 965–973 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.036 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nur Syazwani, O., Rashid, U., Taufiq Yap, Y.H.: Low-cost solid catalyst derived from waste Cyrtopleura costata (Angel Wing Shell) for biodiesel production using microalgae oil. Energy Convers. Manage. 101, 749–756 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.075 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Suwannakarn, K., Lotero, E., Goodwin Jr., J.G., Lu, C.: Stability of sulfated zirconia and the nature of the catalytically active species in the transesterification of triglycerides. J. Catal. 255(2), 279–286 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2008.02.014 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Allahyari, S., Haghighi, M., Ebadi, A., Hosseinzadeh, S.: Effect of irradiation power and time on ultrasound assisted co-precipitation of nanostructured CuO–ZnO–Al2O3 over HZSM-5 used for direct conversion of syngas to DME as a green fuel. Energy Convers. Manage. 83, 212–222 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.03.071 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Atadashi, I.M., Aroua, M.K., Abdul Aziz, A.R., Sulaiman, N.M.N.: The effects of catalysts in biodiesel production: a review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19(1), 14–26 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.009 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wen, Z., Yu, X., Tu, S.-T., Yan, J., Dahlquist, E.: Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil catalyzed by TiO2–MgO mixed oxides. Bioresour. Technol. 101(24), 9570–9576 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.066 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering FacultySahand University of TechnologySahand New Town, TabrizIran
  2. 2.Reactor and Catalysis Research Center (RCRC)Sahand University of TechnologySahand New Town, TabrizIran

Personalised recommendations