Advertisement

Valorization of Rendering Fats to Produce Biodiesel by Single and Multi Orifice Plate Cavitation Reactor

  • D. DíezEmail author
  • A. Urueña
  • C. Barrios
  • G. Antolín
Original Paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this work is focused on the valorization of category two rendering pig fats, to evaluate their use as source of biodiesel by hydrodynamic cavitation reactors. The optimum reaction conditions have been previously determined in laboratory, obtaining as optimum values 60 °C, 1 wt% of sodium hydroxide, fat to methanol molar ratio of 1:6. The design of the cavitation reactor orifice plates has been carried out taking into account these optimum conditions. The design is based on the cavitation number as a function of the degree of advancement of reaction, which ensures that cavitation occurs through the entire reaction time. Then, the cavitation reactor was used in a pilot plant to study different configurations of orifice plates. The results obtained indicate that it is more efficient to use cavitation reactors with consecutive orifice plates (9.05 g/kJ) instead of traditional stirring reactor (3.75 g/kJ) or single orifice plate reactors (6.7 g/kJ). This reactor also allows reaching higher FAME content (90%) compared to a stirring reactor (85%). It also allows reducing the residence time up to 5 min from 22 min of a stirring reactor or from 10 min of a single orifice plate reactor.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Cavitation reactor Orifice plate Methyl ester Biodiesel Rendering fat Animal by-products 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the LIFE Program under the responsibility of the Directorate General for the Environment of the European Commission (Project LIFE 13 ENV/ES/001115-LIFE VALPORC).

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Leon, M., Garcia, A.N., Marcilla, A., Martinez-Castellanos, I., Navarro, R., Catala, L.: Thermochemical conversion of animal by-products and rendering products. Waste Manag. 73, 447–463 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gogate, P.R.: Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical processing applications: a critical review. Chem. Eng. Process. 47(4), 515–527 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chuah, L.F., Klemeš, J.J., Yusup, S., Bokhari, A., Akbar, M.M.: A review of cleaner intensification technologies in biodiesel production. J. Clean. Prod. 146, 181–193 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghayal, D., Pandit, A.B., Rathod, V.K.: Optimization of biodiesel production in a hydrodynamic cavitation reactor using used frying oil. Ultrason. Sonochem. 20(1), 322–328 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gholami, A., Hajinezhad, A., Pourfayaz, F., Ahmadi, M.H.: The effect of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic cavitation on biodiesel production: an exergy analysis approach. Energy 160, 478–489 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pal, A., Verma, A., Kachhwaha, S.S., Maji, S.: Biodiesel production through hydrodynamic cavitation and performance testing. Renew. Energy 35(3), 619–624 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maddikeri, G.L., Gogate, P.R., Pandit, A.B.: Intensified synthesis of biodiesel using hydrodynamic cavitation reactors based on the interesterification of waste cooking oil. Fuel 137, 285–292 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laosuttiwong, T., Ngaosuwan, K., Kiatkittipong, W., Wongsawaeng, D., Kim-Lohsoontorn, P., Assabumrungrat, S.: Performance comparison of different cavitation reactors for biodiesel production via transesterification of palm oil. J. Clean. Prod. 205, 1094–1101 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    García-Martín, J.F., Alés-Álvarez, F.J., del Carmen López-Barrera, M., Martín-Domínguez, I., Álvarez-Mateos, P.: Cetane number prediction of waste cooking oil-derived biodiesel prior to transesterification reaction using near infrared spectroscopy. Fuel 240, 10–15 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sander, A., Košćak, M.A., Kosir, D., Milosavljević, N., Vuković, J.P., Magić, L.: The influence of animal fat type and purification conditions on biodiesel quality. Renew. Energy 118, 752–760 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirubakaran, M., Selvan, V.A.M.: A comprehensive review of low cost biodiesel production from waste chicken fat. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 390–401 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah, Y.T., Pandit, A.B., Moholkar, V.S.: Cavitation Reaction Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vichare, N.P., Gogate, P.R., Pandit, A.B.: Optimization of hydrodynamic cavitation using a model reaction. Chem. Eng. Technol. 23(8), 683–690 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    García, M., Gonzalo, A., Sánchez, J.L., Arauzo, J., Peña, J.Á.: Prediction of normalized biodiesel properties by simulation of multiple feedstock blends. Biores. Technol. 101(12), 4431–4439 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berrios, M., Siles, J., Martin, M.A., Martin, A.: A kinetic study of the esterification of free fatty acids (FFA) in sunflower oil. Fuel 86(15), 2383–2388 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Apostolakou, A.A., Kookos, I.K., Marazioti, C., Angelopoulos, K.C.: Techno-economic analysis of a biodiesel production process from vegetable oils. Fuel Process. Technol. 90(7–8), 1023–1031 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    García-Martín, J.F., Barrios, C.C., Alés-Álvarez, F.J., Dominguez-Sáez, A., Alvarez-Mateos, P.: Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in an oscillatory flow reactor. Performance as a fuel on a TDI diesel engine. Renew. Energy 125, 546–556 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CARTIF Centro TecnológicoValladolidSpain
  2. 2.ITAP InstituteUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations