Advertisement

Pilot Scale Pyrolysis of Activated Sludge Waste from Milk Processing Factory

  • M. KwapinskaEmail author
  • A. Horvat
  • Y. Liu
  • James J. Leahy
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The majority of the sludge from the treatment of wastewater in milk processing plants is land spread. The drawbacks of land spreading include local oversupply due to high transport costs, which results in sludge being spread on lands in the vicinity of the dairy factories. Local oversupply can lead to accumulation of certain substances in soil through annual application over many years. Therefore, in the long term, there is a need for alternative methods to recover energy and nutrients from increasing volumes of sludge generated from dairy processing. Pyrolysis offers a potential alternative to land spreading, which can reduce health and environmental risks, while providing an avenue for the recovery of energy and nutrients. Pyrolysis allows energy recovery in the form of a high calorific value pyrolysis gas and a char which may be used as a soil amendment. In this study pyrolysis of dried dairy sludge was carried out at pilot scale. The results indicate that a dried biological sludge can be successfully pyrolysed and when mixed with wood the resulting char meets European Biochar Certificate criteria regarding carbon content. Most of the initial energy content of the feedstock was retained in the pyrolysis gas prior to cleaning, 53%, compared to 34.5% in the char and 1.5% in the tar. For the pyrolysis gas after cleaning (mainly cracking in presence of air) the initial energy content of the feedstock retained in the gas was only slightly higher than that retained in the char, 39.2% versus 34.5%, while the tar accounted for 0.8% of the initial energy content.

Keywords

Dairy processing sludge Pilot scale pyrolysis Pyrolysis gas Tar Char Mass balance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Irish State through funding from the Technology Centres programme—Grant Number TC/2014/0016, and Science Foundation Ireland (Grant Number 16/SP/3829).

References

  1. 1.
    Pankakoski, M., Noicol, R., Kestens, H., Bertsch, R., Coldewey, I., Hannemann, H., Kofoed, B., Carballo, J., Merilainen, V., Hale, N., Israilides, C., Moloney, A.M., Odlum, C., Sorilini, C., Kasai, N., Hiddink, J., Barnett, J.W., Sayler, A.R., Duddleston, W., Van Der Walt, H.S., Brits, T.J.: A survey of the composition, treatment and disposal of sludge from dairy effluent treatment plants. Bull. Int. Dairy Federation 356, 4–34 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryan, M.P., Walsh, G.: The Characterisation of dairy waste and the potential of whey for industrial fermentation. In: vol. 2012-WRM-MS-9. Environmental Protection Agency (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kwapinska, M., Leahy, J.J.: Pyrolysis—a way of recovering energy from wastewater sludge from milk processing factories. In: Paper presented at the 5th international conference on sustainable solid waste management, Athens, 21–24 June 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petruy, R., Lettinga, G.: Digestion of a milk-fat emulsion. Biores. Technol. 61(2), 141–149 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00042-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watkins, M., Hash, D.: Dairy factory wastewaters, their use on land and possible environmental impacts—a mini review. Open Agric. J. 4, 1–9 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwapinska, M., Leahy, J.J.: Distribution of ash forming elements during pyrolysis of wastewater treatment sludge from milk processing factories. In: 7th international conference on engineering for waste and biomass valorisation, Prague, Czech Republic, 2–5 July 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dabrowski, W.: Contents of alkaline cations in sludge from dairy wastewater treatment plant. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 16(10), 1259–1265 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frąc, M., Jezierska-Tys, S.: Agricultural utilisation of dairy sewage sludge: its effect on enzymatic activity and microorganisms of the soil environment. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5(14), 1755–1762 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR10.707 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    López-Mosquera, M.E., Moirón, C., Carral, E.: Use of dairy-industry sludge as fertiliser for grasslands in northwest Spain: heavy metal levels in the soil and plants. Resourc Conserv Recycl 30(2), 95–109 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00058-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dabrowski, W.: Treatment and final utilization of sewage sludge from dairy waste water treatment plants located in Podlaskie province. In: Contemporary Problems of Management and Environmental Protection, vol. 4, pp. 141–151. Department of Land Reclamation and Environmental Management, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwapinska, M., Agar, D.A., Leahy, J.J.: Distribution of ash forming elements during pyrolysis of municipal wastewater sludge and sludge from milk processing factories. In: Paper presented at the 6th international conference on sustainable solid waste management, Naxos, Greece, 13–16 June (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheltinga, H.M.J.: Hygienic aspects, fertilizing value and potential for animal feed of sludges from dairy effluent treatment in the Netherlands. Session 5. Sludge from dairy effluent treatment plants. State Inspection of Health and Environmental Protection, Arnhem (1978)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fehily Timoney and Company. Code of Good Practices for the Use of Biosolids in Agriculture: Guidelines for Farmers. Fehily Timoney and Company, Dublin (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Healy, M.G., Fenton, O., Cummins, E., Clarke, R., Peyton, D., Fleming, G., Wall, D., Morrison, L., Cormican, M.: Health and Water Quality Impacts Arising from Land Spreading of Biosolids. Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frac, M., Jezierska-Tys, S., Oszust, K., Gryta, A., Pastor, M.: Assessment of microbiological and biochemical properties of dairy sewage sludge. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14(4), 679–688 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1179-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oszust, K., Frac, M.: Evaluation of microbial community composition of dairy sewage sludge, corn silage, grass straw, and fruit waste biomass for potential use in biogas production or soil enrichment. BioResources (2018). http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_13_3_5740_Oszust_Microbial_Community_Composition/6186
  17. 17.
    Fenton, O., Ashekuzzaman, S.M., Forrestal, P., Karl, R.: Potential of recycling dairy processing organic residue. Teagasc (2017). https://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2017/10-Potential-of-recycling-dairy-processing-organicresidues.pdf
  18. 18.
    O’Shea, A.: Where is the sustainable road leading to?. In: Agri environment conference, Dublin, 5 December 2012, pp. 9–12Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu, C., Lancaster, J.: Treatment of secondury pulp and paper sludge for energy recovery. In: DuBois, E., (ed.) Energy Recovery, pp. 187–212. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samolada, M.C., Zabaniotou, A.A.: Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece. Waste Manag. 34(2), 411–420 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Syed-Hassan, S.S.A., Wang, Y., Hu, S., Su, S., Xiang, J.: Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 888–913 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trinh, T.N., Jensen, P.A., Dam-Johansen, K., Knudsen, N.O., Sørensen, H.R.: Influence of the pyrolysis temperature on sewage sludge product distribution, bio-oil, and char properties. Energy Fuels. 27(3), 1419–1427 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301944r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Capodaglio, A.G., Callegari, A., Dondi, D.: Microwave-Induced pyrolysis for production of sustainable biodiesel from waste sludges. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 7(4), 703–709 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9496-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, X., Wang, B., Wu, S., Kong, X., Fang, Y., Liu, J.: Optimizing the conditions for the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of cotton stalk for bio-oil production using response surface methodology. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8(4), 1361–1369 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9692-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lam, S.S., Liew, R.K., Cheng, C.K., Rasit, N., Ooi, C.K., Ma, N.L., Ng, J.-H., Lam, W.H., Chong, C.T., Chase, H.A.: Pyrolysis production of fruit peel biochar for potential use in treatment of palm oil mill effluent. J. Environ. Manag. 213, 400–408 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zacharof, M.-P.: Grape winery waste as feedstock for bioconversions: applying the biorefinery concept. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8(4), 1011–1025 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9674-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liew, R.K., Nam, W.L., Chong, M.Y., Phang, X.Y., Su, M.H., Yek, P.N.Y., Ma, N.L., Cheng, C.K., Chong, C.T., Lam, S.S.: Oil palm waste: an abundant and promising feedstock for microwave pyrolysis conversion into good quality biochar with potential multi-applications. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 115, 57–69 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., Vaníčková, R.: Processing of residues from biogas plants for energy purposes. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 17(3), 797–801 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0866-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nam, W.L., Phang, X.Y., Su, M.H., Liew, R.K., Ma, N.L., Rosli, M.H.N.B., Lam, S.S.: Production of bio-fertilizer from microwave vacuum pyrolysis of palm kernel shell for cultivation of Oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Sci. Total Environ. 624, 9–16 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashekuzzaman, S.M., Kwapinska M., Leahy, J.J., Richards, K., Fenton, O.: Dairy processing sludge feedstock-based biochars for the removal of phosphorus in discharge effluents. In: Paper presented at the 15th international conference on environmental science and technology, Rhodes, Greece, 31 August to 2 September 2017Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lam, S.S., Liew, R.K., Wong, Y.M., Azwar, E., Jusoh, A., Wahi, R.: Activated carbon for catalyst support from microwave pyrolysis of orange peel. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8(6), 2109–2119 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9804-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Severini, F., Leahy, J.J., Kwapinski, W.: Heterogeneous char based solid acid catalysts from brown bin waste to create a green process for the production of butyl butyrate. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8(7), 2431–2441 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9696-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zielińska, A., Oleszczuk, P., Charmas, B., Skubiszewska-Zięba, J., Pasieczna-Patkowska, S.: Effect of sewage sludge properties on the biochar characteristic. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 112, 201–213 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, J., Zuo, W., Tian, Y., Chen, L., Yin, L., Zhang, J.: Sulfur transformation during microwave and conventional pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51(1), 709–717 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johansen, J.M., Jakobsen, J.G., Frandsen, F.J., Glarborg, P.: Release of K, Cl, and S during pyrolysis and combustion of high-chlorine biomass. Energy Fuels. 25(11), 4961–4971 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201098n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hansson, K.-M., Samuelsson, J., Tullin, C., Åmand, L.-E.: Formation of HNCO, HCN, and NH3 from the pyrolysis of bark and nitrogen-containing model compounds. Combust. Flame. 137(3), 265–277 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lu, H., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Zhuang, L., Yang, Y., Qiu, R.: Characterization of sewage sludge-derived biochars from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 102, 137–143 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Waqas, M., Khan, S., Qing, H., Reid, B.J., Chao, C.: The effects of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar on PAHs and potentially toxic element bioaccumulation in Cucumis sativa L. Chemosphere. 105, 53–61 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen, F., Hu, Y., Dou, X., Chen, D., Dai, X.: Chemical forms of heavy metals in pyrolytic char of heavy metal-implanted sewage sludge and their impacts on leaching behaviors. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 116, 152–160 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim, Y., Parker, W.: A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil. Bioresour. Technol. 99(5), 1409–1416 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.056 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Salman, C.A., Schwede, S., Li, H., Thorin, E., Yan, J.: Integrated concept for sludge pyrolysis in waste water treatment plants for biofuel production and nutrients recovery. In: Sludge management in circular economy, Rome 23–25 May 2018Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tian, F.-J., Li, B.-Q., Chen, Y., Li, C.-Z.: Formation of NOx precursors during the pyrolysis of coal and biomass. Part V. Pyrolysis of a sewage sludge. Fuel. 81(17), 2203–2208 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00139-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maroušek, J.: Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 16(8), 1821–1825 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0730-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Frišták, V., Pipíška, M., Soja, G.: Pyrolysis treatment of sewage sludge: a promising way to produce phosphorus fertilizer. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 1772–1778 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maroušek, J., Kolář, L., Vochozka, M., Stehel, V., Maroušková, A.: Novel method for cultivating beetroot reduces nitrate content. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 60–62 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maroušek, J., Kolář, L., Vochozka, M., Stehel, V., Maroušková, A.: Biochar reduces nitrate level in red beet. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25(18), 18200–18203 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2329-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Horvat, A., Kwapinska, M., Xue, G., Dooley, S., Kwapinski, W., Leahy, J.J.: Detailed measurement uncertainty analysis of solid-phase adsorption-total gas chromatography (gc)-detectable tar from biomass gasification. Energy Fuels. 30(3), 2187–2197 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sunooj, K.V., George, J., Kumar, S., Radhakrishna, V.A., Bawa, K.: A.S.: Thermal degradation and decomposition kinetics of freeze dried cow and camel milk as well as their constituents. J. Food Sci. Eng. 1, 77–84 (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mocanu, A.M., Moldoveanu, C., Odochian, L., Paius, C.M., Apostolescu, N., Neculau, R.: Study on the thermal behavior of casein under nitrogen and air atmosphere by means of the TG-FTIR technique. Thermochim. Acta. 546, 120–126 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.07.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., Zheng, C.: Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. 86(12), 1781–1788 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deng, J., Wang, G., Kuang, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, Y.: Pretreatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 86(2), 331–337 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2009.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Agegnehu, G., Bass, A.M., Nelson, P.N., Bird, M.I.: Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Sci. Total Environ. 543, 295–306 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    European Biochar Foundation (EBC): European Biochar Certificate—Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), Arbaz (2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Morf, P., Hasler, P., Nussbaumer, T.: Mechanisms and kinetics of homogeneous secondary reactions of tar from continuous pyrolysis of wood chips. Fuel. 81(7), 843–853 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00216-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Boroson, M.L., Howard, J.B., Longwell, J.P., Peters, W.A.: Heterogeneous cracking of wood pyrolysis tars over fresh wood char surfaces. Energy Fuels. 3(6), 735–740 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00018a014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taralas, G., Vassilatos, V., Sjorstrom, K., Delgado J.: Thermal and catalytic cracking of n-heptane in presence of CaO, MgO and calcined dolomites. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 69, 1413–1419 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lepez, O., Grochowska, A., Malinowski, A., Stolarek, P., Ledakowicz, S.: Thermal treatment of sewage sludge by integrated processes of drying and pyrolysis in a pilot bench scale. In: European meeting on chemical industry and environment, Tarragona, 10–12 June 2015Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Aznar, M., Anselmo, M.S., Manyà, J.J., Murillo, M.B.: Experimental study examining the evolution of nitrogen compounds during the gasification of dried sewage sludge. Energy Fuels. 23(6), 3236–3245 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef801108s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fonts, I., Azuara, M., Gea, G., Murillo, M.B.: Study of the pyrolysis liquids obtained from different sewage sludge. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 85(1/2), 184–191 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Domínguez, A., Menéndez, J.A., Inguanzo, M., Pís, J.J.: Production of bio-fuels by high temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge using conventional and microwave heating. Bioresour. Technol. 97(10), 1185–1193 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Milne, T.A., Evans, R.J.: Biomass gasifier tars: their nature, formation and conversion. In: vol. NREL/TP-570-25357. (1998)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dresser-Rand: Fuel gas specifications—synthesis gas (Syngas); IC-G-D30–004e (2016)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wei, L., Wen, L., Yang, T., Zhang, N.: Nitrogen transformation during sewage sludge pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 29(8), 5088–5094 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Smetanova, A., Dotterweich, M., Dielh, D., Ulrich, U., Dotterweich N.F.: Influence of biochar and terra preta substances on wettability and erodibility of soils. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie 57, 111–134 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Novak, J.M., Watts, D.W.: Augmenting soil water storage using uncharred switchgrass and pyrolyzed biochars. Soil Use Manag. 29(1), 98–104 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12026 doiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Borchard, N., Schirrmann, M., Cayuela, M.L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J.M., Fuertes-Mendizábal, T., Sigua, G., Spokas, K., Ippolito, J.A., Novak, J.: Biochar, soil and land-use interactions that reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emissions: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 2354–2364 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yuan, H., Lu, T., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Lei, T.: Sewage sludge biochar: nutrient composition and its effect on the leaching of soil nutrients. Geoderma. 267, 17–23 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dairy Processing Technology CentreUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Sciences, Bernal InstituteUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  3. 3.Dublin Institute of TechnologyDublin 8Ireland

Personalised recommendations