Advertisement

Ultrasonic Assisted Transesterification of Rapeseed Oil to Biodiesel Using Nano Magnetic Catalysts

  • Azemat Fallah Kelarijani
  • Nooshin Gholipour ZanjaniEmail author
  • Arash Kamran Pirzaman
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, the effect of nano magnetic catalysts on biodiesel production from rapeseed oil was investigated. The produced catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and BET surface area analyzer and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Ultrasonic irradiation utilized just for 35 min at different molar ratio of Li/Fe3O4 and Li/ZnO–Fe3O4. The highest yield 99.8% obtained while the molar ratio of catalyst was Li/Fe3O4 = 3/1 and Li/ZnO–Fe3O4 = 3/1. The vibrating sample magnetometer demonstrated that the catalysts could easily be separated due to ferromagnetic property, even if the catalyst was regenerated and used again for esterification. The superparamagnetic behavior of particles exhibited the high yield of recovery of catalyst after three time regeneration and applying in reaction. Moreover, the results revealed that using mentioned basic nano magnetic catalyst and ultrasonic waves at 37 kHz frequency could decrease the reaction temperature and reaction time and increase biodiesel production yield comparing with conventional mechanical stirring method. The specifications of produced fatty acid methyl esters like viscosity and flash point were complied with the mentioned requirements in ASTM D6751.

Keywords

Biodiesel Ultrasonic irradiation Nano-magnetic catalyst 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge research enter of Iranian standard institute for the support of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Meher, L.C., Vidya, D., Sagar, Naik, S.N.: Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10(3), 248–268 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandolesi de Araújo, C.D., et al.: Biodiesel production from used cooking oil: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 27, 445–452 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mostafaei, B., et al.: Optimization of ultrasonic reactor geometry for biodiesel production using response surface methodology. J. Agric. Sci. and Technol. 15(4), 697–708 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Du, W., et al.: Comparative study on lipase-catalyzed transformation of soybean oil for biodiesel production with different acyl acceptors. J. Mol. Catal. B 30(3), 125–129 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Talebian-Kiakalaieh, A., Amin, N.A.S., Mazaheri, H.: A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Appl. Energy 104, 683–710 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaur, M., Ali, A.: Lithium ion impregnated calcium oxide as nano catalyst for the biodiesel production from karanj a and jatropha oils. Renew. Energy 36, 2866–2871 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gryglewicz, S.: Rapeseed oil methyl esters preparation using heterogeneous catalysts. Biores. Technol. 70(3), 249–253 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, S., et al.: Nano-magnetic catalyst KF/CaO–Fe3O4 for biodiesel production. Appl. Energy 88(8), 2685–2690 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suppes, G.J., et al.: Transesterification of soybean oil with zeolite and metal catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 257(2), 213–223 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shankar, A.A., Pentapati, P.R., Prasad, R.K.: Biodiesel synthesis from cottonseed oil using homogeneous alkali catalyst and using heterogeneous multi walled carbon nanotubes: characterization and blending studies. Egypt. J. Pet. 26(1), 125–133 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feyzi, M., Hassankhani, A., Rafiee, H.R.: Preparation and characterization of Cs/Al/Fe3O4 nanocatalysts for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 71, 62–68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, S., et al.: Study on preparation of Ca/Al/Fe3O4 magnetic composite solid catalyst and its application in biodiesel transesterification. Fuel Process. Technol. 95, 84–89 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He, B., Van Gerpen, J.H.: Application of ultrasonication in transesterification processes for biodiesel production. Biofuels 3(4), 479–488 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bargole, S., et al.: Process intensification of synthesis of biodiesel using a novel recirculating flow ultrasonication reactor. Chem. Eng. Process. 122, 21–30 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choudhury, H.A., et al.: Ultrasonic biodiesel synthesis from crude Jatropha curcas oil with heterogeneous base catalyst: mechanistic insight and statistical optimization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21(3), 1050–1064 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar, G.: Ultrasonic-assisted reactive-extraction is a fast and easy method for biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas oilseeds. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 634–639 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joshi, S., et al.: Intensification of biodiesel production from soybean oil and waste cooking oil in the presence of heterogeneous catalyst using high speed homogenizer. Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 645–653 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ji, J., et al.: Preparation of biodiesel with the help of ultrasonic and hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrasonics 44, e411–e414 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malani, R.S., et al.: Mechanistic analysis of ultrasound-assisted biodiesel synthesis with Cu2O catalyst and mixed oil feedstock using continuous (packed bed) and batch (slurry) reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 170, 743–755 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colucci, A., Borrero, J.E., Alape, F.: Biodiesel from an alkaline transesterification reaction of soybean oil using ultrasonic mixing. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 82, 525–530 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cintas, P., et al.: A new pilot flow reactor for high-intensity ultrasound irradiation. Application to the synthesis of biodiesel. Ultrason. Sonochem. 17(6), 985–989 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thanh, L.T., et al.: Ultrasound-assisted production of biodiesel fuel from vegetable oils in a small scale circulation process. Biores. Technol. 101(2), 639–645 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hingu, M., Gogate, S.P., Rathod, V.K.: Synthesis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using sonochemical reactors. Ultrason. Sonochem. 17, 827–832 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stavarache, C., Vinatoru, M., Maeda, Y.: Aspects of ultrasonically assisted transesterification of various vegetable oils with methanol. Ultrason. Sonochem. 14, 380–386 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramachandran, K., et al.: Recent developments for biodiesel production by ultrasonic assist transesterification using different heterogeneous catalyst: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 22, 410–418 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jookjantra, K., Wongwuttanasatian, T.: Optimisation of biodiesel production from refined palm oil with heterogeneous CaO catalyst using pulse ultrasonic waves under a vacuum condition. Energy Convers. Manag. 154, 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hasanpour, A., et al.: Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4 and ZnO nanocomposites by the sol–gel method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 334, 41–44 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kassem, Y., Çamur, H.: A laboratory study of the effects of wide range temperature on the properties of biodiesel produced from various waste vegetable oils. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 8(6), 1995–2007 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leung, D., Wu, X., Leung, M.K.H.: A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl. Energy 87(4), 1083–1095 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM: Standard Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent and Opaque Liquids (and Calculation of Dynamic Viscosity), in ASTM D445. (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    ASTM: Standard test method for corrosiveness to copper from petroleum products by copper strip test, in ASTM D130. (2018)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    EN: Liquid petroleum products—fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) for use in diesel engines and heating applications—Requirements and test methods, in EN 14214. (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM: Standard test methods for flash point by pensky-martens closed cup tester, in ASTM D93. (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    EN: Petroleum products -Determination of water -Coulometric Karl Fischer titration method, in EN ISO 12937Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    ASTM: Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, in ASTM D6751–15ce1 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    ISO: Petroleum products - Biodiesel - Determination of total ester content by gas chromatography, in ISO/TS17307. (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nayek, C., et al.: Investigating size- and temperature-dependent coercivity and saturation magnetization in peg coated fe3o4 nanoparticles. Magnetochemistry 3(2), 19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mazanov, S.V., et al.: Continuous production of biodiesel from rapeseed oil by ultrasonic assist transesterification in supercritical ethanol. J. Supercrit. Fluids 118, 107–118 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    EN: Fat and oil derivatives. Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). Determination of Ca, K, Mg and Na content by optical emission spectral analysis with inductively coupled plasma (ICP OES) in EN 14538. (2006)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Malani, R., Goyal, A., Moholkar, V.S.: Ultrasound-Assisted Biodiesel Synthesis: A Mechanistic Insight, in Biofuels- Green Energy and Technology, pp. 103–135. Springer, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Refaat, A.: Biodiesel production using solid metal oxide catalyst. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 203–221 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu, C., et al.: The nanometer magnetic solid base catalyst for production of biodiesel. Renewable Energy 35(7), 1531–1536 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen, G., et al.: Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in a magnetically fluidized bed reactor using whole-cell biocatalysts. Energy Convers. Manag. 138, 556–564 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nikseresht, A., et al.: Ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production by a novel composite of Fe(III)-based MOF and phosphotangestic acid as efficient and reusable catalyst. Ultrason. Sonochem. 37, 203–207 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Korkut, I., Bayramoglu, M.: Selection of catalyst and reaction conditions for ultrasound assisted biodiesel production from canola oil. Renew. Energy 116(PA), 543–551 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Malani, R., et al.: Ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production using KI-impregnated zinc oxide (ZnO) as heterogeneous catalyst: a mechanistic approach. In: Conference Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Bioenergy Research, vol. 5. (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology of MazandaranBehshahrIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Chemistry and Petrochemical EngineeringStandard Research InstituteKarajIran

Personalised recommendations