Advertisement

Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 33–44 | Cite as

Optimization of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Sunflower Seed Cake Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Ivanor ZardoEmail author
  • Andressa de Espíndola Sobczyk
  • Ligia Damasceno Ferreira Marczak
  • Julia Sarkis
Original Paper

Abstract

Sunflower seed cake is a by-product of the sunflower oil industry which is a valuable source of protein for animal feed. The presence of phenolic compounds significantly affects the sunflower proteins quality to animal feeding, decreasing its commercial value. Seeking to valorize this by-product, by improving the nutritive potential of the sunflower cake and getting an extract rich in antioxidants, the present study aims to maximize the phenolic compounds extraction from sunflower seed cake. The following parameters were evaluated: temperature (20–70 °C), ethanol concentration (0–85%) and ultrasound amplitude (0–80 µm). Response surface methodology was employed to optimize the extraction factors and a second order polynomial model provided a satisfactory fit to the experimental data. The response variables analyzed were the total phenolic compounds and the chlorogenic acid concentrations, which ranged between 751 and 1851 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g and 609–1635 mg CGA/100 g of sunflower seed cake in dry basis, respectively. The temperature and ethanol concentration showed the highest effect on the TPC extraction from sunflower cake. The ultrasound-assisted extraction effect was observed only in the first minute of extraction, having no influence at longer times.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Alternative extraction technologies Recovery of by-products Helianthus annuus L. Antinutrients Chlorogenic acid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

References

  1. 1.
    González-Pérez, S., Merck, K.B., Vereijken, J.M., van Koningsveld, G.A., Gruppen, H., Voragen AGJ: Isolation and characterization of undenatured chlorogenic acid free sunflower (Helianthus annuus) proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 1713–1719 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kachrimanidou, V., Kopsahelis, N., Alexandri, M., Strati, A., Gardeli, C., Papanikolaou, S., Komaitis, M., Kookos, I.K., Koutinas, A.A.: Integrated sunflower-based biorefinery for the production of antioxidants, protein isolate and poly (3-hydroxybutyrate). Ind. Crops Prod. 71, 106–113 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weisz, G.M., Kammerer, D.R., Carle, R.: Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) kernels and shells by HPLC-DAD/ESI-MSn. Food. Chem. 115, 758–765 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozdal, T., Capanoglu, E., Altay, F.: A review on protein–phenolic interactions and associated changes. Food Res. Int. 51, 954–970 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedrosa, M.M., Muzquiz, M., García-Vallejo, C., Burbano, C., Cuadrado, C., Ayet, G., Robredo, L.M.: Determination of caffeic and chlorogenic acids and their derivatives in different sunflower seeds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 459–464 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maier, T., Schieber, A., Kammerer, D.R., Carle, R.: Residues of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed oil production as a valuable source of phenolic antioxidants. Food. Chem. 112, 551–559 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    González-Pérez, S., Vereijken, J.M.: Sunflower proteins: overview of their physicochemical, structural and functional properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87, 2173–2191 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taha, F.S., Mohamed, G.F., Mohamed, S.H., Mohamed, S.S., Kamil, M.M.: Optimization of the extraction of total phenolic compounds from sunflower meal and evaluation of the bioactivities of chosen extracts. Am. J. Food Technol. 6, 1002–1020 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, J., Sun, B., Cao, Y., Tian, Y., Li, X.: Optimisation of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat bran. Food. Chem. 106, 804–810 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soria, A.C., Villamiel, M.: Effect of ultrasound on the technological properties and bioactivity of food: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21, 323–331 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rostagno, M.A., Palma, M., Barroso, C.G.: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of soy isoflavones. J. Chromatogr. A. 1012, 119–128 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chemat, F., Zill e, H., Khan, M.K.: Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 813–835 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vilkhu, K., Mawson, R., Simons, L., Bates, D.: Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry—a review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 9, 161–169 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    AOAC: Solids (Total) and moisture in flour, Method 925.10., edn AOAC International. In: Gaithersburg (ed.) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Vol.18th, AOAC International, Washington, D.C. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    AOAC: Determination of protein content in food, method 945.18-B. In: Gaithersburg (ed.) Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC International, Washington, D.C. (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    AOAC: Fat (total, saturated, unsaturated, and monounsaturated) in cereal products, Method 996.01. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 17th edn.. AOAC International, Washington, D.C. (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Contamine, R.F., Wilhelm, A.M., Berlan, J., Delmas, H.: Power measurement in sonochemistry. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2, S43–S47 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Statsoft: STATISTICA (data analisys software system). (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waterhouse, A.L.: Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morelli L.L.L., Prado, M.A.: Extraction optimization for antioxidant phenolic compounds in red grape jam using ultrasound with a response surface methodology. Ultrason. Sonochem. 19, 1144–1149 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rodrigues, E., Mariutti L.R.B., Mercadante, A.Z.: Carotenoids and phenolic compounds from solanum sessiliflorum, an unexploited amazonian fruit, and their scavenging capacities against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 61, 3022–3029 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cunnif PA: Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Castro A.M.D., Castilho L.D.R., Freire D.M.G.: Characterization of babassu, canola, castor seed and sunflower residual cakes for use as raw materials for fermentation processes. Ind. Crops Prod. 83, 140–148 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Şahin, S., Şamlı, R.: Optimization of olive leaf extract obtained by ultrasound-assisted extraction with response surface methodology. Ultrason. Sonochem. 20, 595–602 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cacace, J.E., Mazza, G.: Optimization of extraction of anthocyanins from black currants with aqueous ethanol. J. Food Sci. 68, 240–248 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, C.-H., Hwang, K.-E., Kim, H.-W., Song, D.-H., Kim, Y.-J., Ham, Y.-K., Choi, Y.-S., Jang, S.-J., Jeong, T.-J., Kim, C.-J.: Antioxidant activity of brown soybean ethanolic extracts and application to cooked pork patties. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 36, 359 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teh, S.-S., Birch, E.J.: Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of extract from defatted hemp, flax and canola seed cakes. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21, 346–353 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Corrales, M., Toepfl, S., Butz, P., Knorr, D., Tauscher, B.: Extraction of anthocyanins from grape by-products assisted by ultrasonics, high hydrostatic pressure or pulsed electric fields: a comparison. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 9, 85–91 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kadam, S.U., Tiwari, B.K., Smyth, T.J., O’Donnell, C.P.: Optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive components from brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum using response surface methodology. Ultrason. Sonochem. 23, 308–316 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, L., Weller, C.L.: Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17, 300–312 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vinatoru, M.: An overview of the ultrasonically assisted extraction of bioactive principles from herbs. Ultrason. Sonochem. 8, 303–313 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarkis, J.R., Boussetta, N., Blouet, C., Tessaro, I.C., Marczak L.D.F., Vorobiev, E.: Effect of pulsed electric fields and high voltage electrical discharges on polyphenol and protein extraction from sesame cake. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 29, 170–177 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivanor Zardo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andressa de Espíndola Sobczyk
    • 1
  • Ligia Damasceno Ferreira Marczak
    • 1
  • Julia Sarkis
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartamentUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations