Advertisement

Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Study of Biochemical and Microbiological Properties During Co-composting of Spent Mushroom Substrates and Chicken Feather

  • Xiaolin Xie
  • Xiaobo Guo
  • Lian Zhou
  • Qing YaoEmail author
  • Honghui Zhu
Original Paper
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

To study the biochemical and microbiological properties during co-composting of chicken feather and spent mushroom substrates, chicken feather by incubation of multiple microorganisms were co-composted for 28 days with Pleurotus geesteranus-degraded Eucalyptus sawdust (PE), P. geesteranus-degraded weed tree sawdust (PW) and Ganoderma lucidum-degraded weed tree sawdust (GW), respectively. Characteristics of physico-chemical, enzymatic and microbiological parameters during composting were investigated in terms of temperature, pH, moisture, activities of CMCase, and succession of bacteria and fungus. Results showed that the peak temperature in PEC was 59 °C on 5 days. No ascaris egg was detected in the final composts of PEC, PWC and GWC. The pH of compost in PEC and GWC were about 8.5, which was higher than pH of compost in PWC 7.4. The activities of CMCase in PEC were significantly higher than PWC and GWC during composting. The OM and C/N on 28 days decreased compared to the raw materials. The PCR-DGGE profiles showed significant differences in structure of bacteria and fungus after composting. Four prominent species of bacteria were replaced by uncultured bacterium and the prominent species of fungus were thermophiles and cellulolytic strains on 28 days. Correlation properties were similarly shared by the physico-chemical parameter and bacteria as well as fungus.

Keywords

Compost Chicken feather Spent mushroom substrate PCR-DGGE Bacterial community Fungal community 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2015A020209087, No.2016B090918090), Guangzhou Sci-technology Project (No. 201502080070), High-tech Industry and Strategically Emerging Industries Sci-technology Project of Zhaoqing High-tech Zone (No. 2015B010102006), the Special Program for Leading Talents of Guangdong Province (No. 2015TX01N036), the Funds for Environment Construction and Capacity Building of GDAS’ Research Platform (No. 2016GDASPT-0302) and the Innovation-driven Development Capability Construction Program of GDAS (No. 2017GDASCX-0402).

Supplementary material

12649_2017_35_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang, L., Sun, X.: Changes in physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage co-composting of green waste with spent mushroom compost and biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 171, 274–284 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, G.F., Wu, Q.T., Wong, J.W.C., Nagar, B.B.: Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust. Bioresour. Technol. 97(15), 1834–1842 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao, W., Liang, J., Pizzul, L., Feng, X.M., Zhang, K., del Pilar Castillo, M.: Evaluation of spent mushroom substrate as substitute of peat in Chinese biobeds. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 98, 107–112 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtin, J.S., Mullen, G.J.: Physical properties of some intensively cultivated soils of Ireland amended with spent mushroom compost. Land Degrad. Dev. 18(4), 355–368 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa, J.C., Barbosa, S.G., Sousa, D.Z.: Effects of pre-treatment and bioaugmentation strategies on the anaerobic digestion of chicken feathers. Bioresour. Technol. 120, 114–119 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T.: Studies on the decomposition of keratin wastes by saprotrophic microfungi. I. Criteria for evaluating keratinolytic activity. Acta Mycol. 32(1), 51–79 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meng, L., Li, W.G., Zhang, S.M., Wu, C.D., Lv, L.Y.: Feasibility of co-composting of sewage sludge, spent mushroom substrate and wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 226, 39–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bohacz, J., Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T.: Changes in enzymatic activity in composts containing chicken feathers. Bioresour. Technol. 100(14), 3604–3612 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piterina, A.V., Pembroke, J.T.: Use of PCR-DGGE based molecular methods to analyse microbial community diversity and stability during the thermophilic stages of an ATAD wastewater sludge treatment process as an aid to performance monitoring. ISRN Biotechnol. (2013). doi: 10.5402/2013/162645
  10. 10.
    Yin, Y., Song, W., Gu, J., Zhang, K., Qian, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, X.: Effects of copper on the abundance and diversity of ammonia oxidizers during dairy cattle manure composting. Bioresour. Technol. 221, 181–187 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, H., Xu, X., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Wang, J., Lu, X.: Molecular analyses of the functional microbial community in composting by PCR-DGGE targeting the genes of the β-glucosidase. Bioresour. Technol. 134, 51–58 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie, X., Gu, Z., Chen, M., Yao, Q., Zhu, H.: Study on the related enzyme activities in the residues of different mushroom substrates inoculated with Cellulomonas uda and Trichoderma viride. Biotechnol. Bull. 12, 162–166 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NY/T 798-2004, Compound microorganisms fertilizers. Beijing: Chinese Standard Press, 2004Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NY 525-2012, Organic fertilizer. Beijing: Chinese Standard Press, 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long, L., Yang, S., Yao, Q., Zhu, H.: DNA extraction from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and analysis by PCR-DGGE gradient gel electrophoresis. Mycosystema 24(4), 564–569 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niu, J., Gao, J., Li, Y., Li, G.: Evaluation of the role of microorganisms in composting. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 15, 185–189 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., Lubitz, W., Rölleke, S.: Application of broad-range 16S rRNA PCR amplification and DGGE fingerprinting for detection of tick-infecting bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 52(2), 251–260 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., Taylor, J.W.: Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. 18, 315–322 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muyzer, G., De Waal, E.C., Uitterlinden, A.G.: Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59(3), 695–700 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gafan, G.P., Lucas, V.S., Roberts, G.J., Petrie, A., Wilson, M., Spratt, D.A.: Statistical analyses of complex denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(8), 3971–3978 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manefield, M., Griffiths, R.I., Leigh, M.B., Fisher, R., Whiteley, A.S.: Functional and compositional comparison of two activated sludge communities remediating coking effluent. Environ. Microbiol. 7(5), 715–722 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agnolucci, M., Cristani, C., Battini, F., Palla, M., Cardelli, R., Saviozzi, A., Nuti, M.: Microbially-enhanced composting of olive mill solid waste (wet husk): bacterial and fungal community dynamics at industrial pilot and farm level. Bioresour. Technol. 134, 10–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ali, M., Kazmi, A.A., Ahmed, N.: Study on effects of temperature, moisture and pH in degradation and degradation kinetics of aldrin, endosulfan, lindane pesticides during full-scale continuous rotary drum composting. Chemosphere. 102, 68–75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kalamdhad, A.S., Singh, Y.K., Ali, M., Khwairakpam, M., Kazmi, A.A.: Rotary drum composting of vegetable waste and tree leaves. Bioresour. Technol. 100(24), 6442–6450 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guo, X., Lu, Y., Li, Q.: Effect of adding flue gas desulphurization gypsum on the transformation and fate of nitrogen during composting. Compost Sci. Util. 24(4), 230–237 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stentiford, E.I.: Composting control: principles and practice. In: The Science of Composting, pp. 49–59. Springer, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jurado, M.M., Suárez-Estrella, F., Vargas-García, M.C., López, M.J., López-González, J.A., Moreno, J.: Evolution of enzymatic activities and carbon fractions throughout composting of plant waste. J. Environ. Manag. 133, 355–364 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rashad, F.M., Saleh, W.D., Moselhy, M.A.: Bioconversion of rice straw and certain agro-industrial wastes to amendments for organic farming systems: 1. Composting, quality, stability and maturity indices. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 5952–5960 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paredes, C.: Windrow composting as horticultural waste management strategy—a case study in Ecuador. Waste Manag. 48, 127–134 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Belyaeva, O.N., Haynes, R.J.: Chemical, microbial and physical properties of manufactured soils produced by co-composting municipal green waste with coal fly ash. Bioresour. Technol. 100(21), 5203–5209 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Roig, A., Paredes, C., Bernal, M.P.: Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresour. Technol. 78(3), 301–308 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, R., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Shen, F., Zhang, G., Qin, R., Xiao, R.: Nutrient transformations during composting of pig manure with bentonite. Bioresour. Technol. 121, 362–368 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kaushik, P., Malik, A., Sharma, S.: Vermicomposting: an eco-friendly option for fermentation and dye decolourization waste disposal. Clean 41, 616–621 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Singh, A., Sharma, S.: Composting of a crop residue through treatment with microorganisms and subsequent vermicomposting. Bioresour. Technol. 85(2), 107–111 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zeng, G., Yu, M., Chen, Y., Huang, D., Zhang, J., Huang, H., Jiang, R., Yu, Z.: Effects of inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium at various time points on enzyme activities during agricultural waste composting. Bioresour. Technol. 101(1), 222–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Castaldi, P., Garau, G., Melis, P.: Maturity assessment of compost from municipal solid waste through the study of enzyme activities and water-soluble fractions. Waste Manag. 28(3), 534–540 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cunha-Queda, A.C., Ribeiro, H.M., Ramos, A., Cabral, F.: Study of biochemical and microbiological parameters during composting of pine and eucalyptus bark. Bioresour. Technol. 98(17), 3213–3220 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Danon, M., Franke Whittle, I.H., Insam, H., Chen, Y., Hadar, Y.: Molecular analysis of bacterial community succession during prolonged compost curing. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 65(1), 133–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tian, W., Sun, Q., Xu, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, D., Li, C., Shen, Q., Shen, B.: Succession of bacterial communities during composting process as detected by 16S rRNA clone libraries analysis. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 78, 58–66 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xie, X., Zhao, Y., Sun, Q., Wang, X., Cui, H., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Wei, Z.: A novel method for contributing to composting start-up at low temperature by inoculating cold-adapted microbial consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 238, 39–47 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ishikawa, K., Ohmori, T., Miyamoto, H., Ito, T., Kumagai, Y., Sonoda, M., Matsumoto, J., Miyamoto, H., Kodama, H.: Denitrification in soil amended with thermophile-fermented compost suppresses nitrate accumulation in plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97(3), 1349–1359 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Knerr, A., Tripepi, R.R.: Changes in bacterial communities in dairy manure during nine months of composting as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. In: International symposium on growing media and soilless cultivation, 1034 pp 399–407 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, X., Cui, H., Shi, J., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Wei, Z.: Relationship between bacterial diversity and environmental parameters during composting of different raw materials. Bioresour. Technol. 198, 395–402 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eiland, F., Klamer, M., Lind, A.M., Leth, M., Bååth, E.: Influence of initial C/N ratio on chemical and microbial composition during long term composting of straw. Microbiol. Ecol. 41(3), 272–280 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaolin Xie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaobo Guo
    • 2
  • Lian Zhou
    • 2
  • Qing Yao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Honghui Zhu
    • 2
  1. 1.College of HorticultureSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection CenterState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, South China (The Ministry-Province Joint Development)GuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations