Advertisement

Psychological Studies

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 455–464 | Cite as

Examining the Psychometric Properties of a Modified Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: A Rasch Measurement Approach

  • Shaljan AreepattamannilEmail author
  • Dean Cairns
Assessment
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing on data from the second wave of the Children’s Worlds: International Survey of Children’s Well-Being, this study examined the psychometric properties of a modified Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) using the Rasch measurement model in a sample of 1817 10- and 12-year-old children belonging to a highly collectivistic South Asian country, Nepal. Results of the study revealed that the modified SLSS data met the assumptions of the Rasch measurement model, and the internal structure of the modified SLSS represented a hierarchy of item difficulties. The modified SLSS items also exhibited adequate model-data fit, and they were found to be invariant across gender and age groups. Taken together, the modified SLSS is a psychometrically sound measure appropriate for assessing life satisfaction among Nepalese children.

Keywords

Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale Rasch measurement model Psychometric properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The data used in this publication come from the second wave of Children’s Worlds project: an international survey of children’s lives and well-being (www.isciweb.org). The views expressed here are those of the author(s). They are not necessarily those of ISCWeB.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Areepattamannil, S., & Hashim, J. (2017). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB): Psychometric properties in a non-western adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences,117, 236–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences,26, 815–826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least square estimation in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling,13, 186–203.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology,22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rasch models in health. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  8. de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dew, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1994). Adolescents’ perceived quality of life: An exploratory investigation. Journal of School Psychology,32, 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(94)90010-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research,112, 497–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin,125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence,21, 649–661.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00698.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forste, R., & Moore, E. (2012). Adolescent obesity and life satisfaction: Perceptions of self, peers, family, and school. Economics & Human Biology,10, 385–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2012.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly,18, 192–205.  https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,35, 293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9036-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A first study of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale with adolescents. Social Indicators Research,52, 135–160.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059227507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., Tian, L., Park, N., O’Byrne, J., Schiff, M., et al. (2008). Cross-national adolescent multidimensional life satisfaction reports: Analyses of mean scores and response style differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,37, 142–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9172-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant, N., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The relationship between life satisfaction and health behavior: A cross-cultural analysis of young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,16, 259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9032-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hashim, J., & Areepattamannil, S. (2017). The Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS): Reliability, validity, and gender invariance in an Indian adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence,57, 54–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.03.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huebner, E. S. (1991a). Initial development of the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. School Psychology International,12, 231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huebner, E. S. (1991b). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. School Psychology Quarterly,6, 103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huebner, E. S. (1995). The Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale: An assessment of psychometric properties with Black and White elementary school students. Social Indicators Research,34, 315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huebner, E. S., Funk, B. A., III, & Gilman, R. (2000). Cross-sectional and longitudinal psychosocial correlates of adolescent life satisfaction reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology,16, 53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1177/082957350001600104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huebner, E. S., & Hills, K. J. (2013). Assessment of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. In D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. L. Schwean (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents (pp. 773–787). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., & Jiang, X. (2013). Assessment and promotion of life satisfaction in youth. In C. Proctor & P. A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents: A positive psychology perspective (pp. 23–42). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jiang, X., Lyons, M. D., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). An examination of the reciprocal relations between life satisfaction and social problem solving in early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence,53, 141–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jung, S., & Choi, E. (2017). Life satisfaction and delinquent behaviors among Korean adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences,104, 104–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerr, J. C., Valois, R. F., Huebner, E. S., & Drane, J. W. (2011). Life satisfaction and peer victimization among USA public high school adolescents. Child Indicators Research,4, 127–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9078-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Honkanen, R., Viinamäki, H., Heikkilä, K., Kaprio, J., & Koskenvuo, M. (2001). Life satisfaction and suicide: A 20-year follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry,158, 433–439.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Kaprio, J., Honkanen, R., Viinamäki, H., & Koskenvuo, M. (2004). Life satisfaction and depression in a 15-year follow-up of healthy adults. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,39, 994–999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0833-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement,3, 103–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimal rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith Jr. & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
  37. Linacre, J. M. (2015a). Winsteps (version 3.91.0) [computer software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.Google Scholar
  38. Linacre, J. M. (2015b). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministep: Rasch-model computer programs. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.Google Scholar
  39. Løvereide, L., & Hagell, P. (2016). Measuring life satisfaction in Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls using the Satisfaction With Life Scale. PLoS ONE,11(10), e0163931.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., Eid, M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being. Journal of Research in Personality,46, 431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyons, M. D., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). Academic characteristics of early adolescents with higher levels of life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life,11, 757–771.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9394-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacDonald, P., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). A Monte Carlo comparison of item and person statistics used in item response theory versus classical test theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement,62, 921–943.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402238082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A., III. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88, 189–202.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus (version 7.4) [computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  45. Neto, F. (1993). The Satisfaction With Life Scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,22, 125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality,40, 411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). PISA data analysis manual for SPSS ssers (2nd ed.). Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  48. Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction measures: A review. The Journal of Positive Psychology,4, 128–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2010). Very happy youths: Benefits of very high life satisfaction among adolescents. Social Indicators Research,98, 519–532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9562-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods,17, 354–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi square test statistic. Psychometrika,75, 243–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Schilling, O. (2006). Development of life satisfaction in old age: Another view on the “paradox”. Social Indicators Research,75, 241–271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-5297-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2009). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 181–212). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82, 582–593.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research,99, 323–338.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schumacker, R. E., & Smith, E. V. (2007). Reliability: A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement,67, 394–409.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406294776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwarz, B., Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Ben-Arieh, A., Friedlmeier, M., Lubiewska, K., et al. (2012). Does the importance of parent and peer relationships for adolescents’ life satisfaction vary across cultures? The Journal of Early Adolescence,32, 55–80.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611419508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  60. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H.-P. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly,55, 3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1086/269239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Terry, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1995). The relationship between self-concept and life satisfaction in children. Social Indicators Research,35, 39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valois, R. F., Zullig, K. J., Huebner, E. S., & Drane, J. W. (2004). Life satisfaction and suicide among high school adolescents. Social Indicators Research,66, 81–105.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007499.19430.2f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vittersø, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: Item response modeling of the satisfaction with life scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research,74, 327–348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4644-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Assessment and School Evaluation DivisionEmirates College for Advanced EducationAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations