Validation of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Short Form 3 in Indian Population
Young Schema Questionnaire—Short Form 3 (YSQ-S3) which measures Early Maladaptive Schema (EMS) has received limited attention in Indian context. The goal of the study was to validate the psychometric properties of YSQ-S3 in a non-clinical Indian sample using data collected from 702 participants (age range 16–55 years). Based on reliability and confirmatory factor analysis, we established that our data supported Young’s proposed 18 EMS model based on the US population. Additionally, YSQ-S3’s concurrent validity was established with standardized instruments, namely Beck Depression Inventory-II, Scale of Positive and Negative Experience, Big Five Inventory and General Health Questionnaire-12. The findings from our analyses indicated that most EMSs correlated significantly with the validity dimensions. Furthermore, our findings identified age- and gender-related differences across the 18 EMS. Our findings confirmed that YSQ-S3 is a robust psychometric tool for assessing EMS on non-clinical population, and further research is needed to establish its use on clinical population in India.
KeywordsYoung Schema Questionnaire Factor analysis Maladaptive schema Validity Reliability India
The authors would like to acknowledge the efforts and contribution of Dr. Dalbir Singh, Associate Professor, Pt. N.R.S. Government College, Rohtak, Haryana, India for his support with the data collection. Authors will also like to thank Dr. Ankit Gupta, Scientist II, Arcellx, Inc., Maryland, USA for his help in editing this paper.
The authors declare that no funding was received from any source for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with regards to the research, authorship and publication of this study.
All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Written informed consent stating the anonymity and confidentiality of responses, volunteer participation and the use of responses for the sole use of research was obtained from all individual participants. No identifying information from the participants was collected for the study. Participation was voluntary, and participants were free to withdraw from the research at any stage.
- Anmuth, L. M. (2011). Early maladaptive schemas and negative life events in the prediction of depression and anxiety. Glassboro: Rowan University.Google Scholar
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Carr, S. N. (2006). Retrospective reporting of childhood factors and borderline personality disorder features in a non-clinical sample: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University.Google Scholar
- Chanakya, B. (2002). Psychosocial factors, maladaptive cognitive schemas, and depression in Young adults: An integration. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
- D’Andrea, J. T. (2003). An investigation of the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and psychological adjustment: The moderating effects of spiritual coping styles. Bronx, New York: Fordham University.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 39, pp. 247–266). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12.
- Dobson, K. (2009). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (3rd ed.). USA: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. A., Campbell, L. F., Calhoun, G. B., Bates, J. M., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2002). The early maladaptive schema questionnaire-short form: A construct validity study. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35(1), 2–13.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
- Gouveia, V. V., Chaves, S. S. D. S., Oliveira, I. C. P. D., Dias, M. R., & Andrade, P. R. D. (2003). The use of GHQ-12 in a general population: A study of its construct validity. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa, 19(3), 241–248.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, N., Hautekeete, M., & Kochman, F. (2001). Early maladaptive processes, depression and alexithymia in suicidal hospitalized adolescents. Encephale, 27(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
- Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative methods, 3(1), 76–83.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kriston, L., Schafer, J., Harter, M., & Holzel, L. P. (2010). All the same? Factorial structure of the Young schema questionnaire—short form 3 (YSQ-S3). In Paper presented at the the 4th annual international society of schema therapy meeting. Berlin.Google Scholar
- Macik, D. (2017). Symptoms of mental health disorders and early maladaptive schemas-assessment of dependencies. Psychoterapia, 1(180), 33–47.Google Scholar
- Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the MCMI-II (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
- Rijkeboer, M. M., van den Bergh, H., & van den Bout, J. (2005). Stability and discriminative power of Young schema questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.08.005.Google Scholar
- Saariaho, T., Saariaho, A., Karila, I., & Joukamaa, M. (2009). The psychometric properties of the finnish Young schema questionnaire in chronic pain patients and a non-clinical sample. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.07.005.Google Scholar
- Sahoo, S., Kumar, A., & Pradhan, N. (2012). Cognitive schemas among mental health professionals: Adaptive or maladaptive? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 17(6), 523–526.Google Scholar
- Saritas, D., & Gencoz, T. (2011). Adolescents’ emotion regulation and its relation with their mothers’ emotion regulation and parental rearing behaviors. Turkish Journal of Child Adolescent Mental Health, 18(2), 117–126.Google Scholar
- Saritas, D., & Tulin, G. (2011). Psychometric properties of Young schema questionnaire—short form 3 in a Turkish adolescent sample. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 11(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
- Shahamat, F. (2011). Predicting general health symptoms (somatization, anxiety, depression) from early maladaptive schemas. Journal of Psychology (Tabriz University), 5(20), 103–124.Google Scholar
- Soygüt, G., & Cakir, Z. (2009). The mediating role of the interpersonal schemas between parenting styles and psychological symptoms: A schema focused view. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 20(2), 144–152.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Trip, S. (2006). The Romanian version of Young schema questionnaire—short form-3 (YSQ-S3). Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 6(2), 173–181.Google Scholar
- Wang, C. E., Halvorsen, M., Eisemann, M., & Waterloo, K. (2010). Stability of dysfunctional attitudes and early maladaptive schemas: A 9-year follow-up study of clinically depressed subjects. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.002.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E. (1990a). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota: Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E. (1990b). Schema therapy: Conceptual model. In J. E. Young, J. S. Klokko, & M. E. Weishaar (Eds.), Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 1–2). New York: Guilford press.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E. (2003). Young schema questionnaire—long form 3 (YSQ-L3). New York: Schema Therapy Institiute.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E. (2005). Young schema questionnaire: Short form 3 (YSQ-S3). New York: Cognitive Therapy center.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1994). Young schema questionnaire. In J. E. Young (Ed.), Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (2nd ed.). Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (1999). Young schema questionnaire: Short version. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E., & Brown, G. (2003). Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-L2). New York: Cognitive Therapy Center of New York.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Young, J. E., Pascal, B., & Cousineau, P. (2005). Questionnaire des schemas de Young (YSQ-S3). New York: Schema Therapy Institute.Google Scholar
- Ziba, B. I., Javad, B. M., & Mojitaba, B. (2016). Effectiveness of cognitive therapy based on compassionate-mind on the modification of maladaptive schemas and reduction of negative emotions in students with mathematics disorder. Contemporary Psychology, 11(1), 103–117.Google Scholar