Advertisement

Factorial Validity of the Student–Teacher Relationship Scale—Short Form, Latent Means Comparison of Teacher–Student Relationship Quality and Association with Child Problem and Prosocial Behaviours

  • Michael Osei Aboagye
  • Jinliang Qin
  • Simona Pekárková
  • Collins Opoku Antwi
  • Yasin JababuEmail author
  • Kotor Asare
  • Emmanuel Affum-Osei
  • Nila Akinyi
Research in Progress

Abstract

The present study verified the hypothesised two-factor structure of the student–teacher relationship scale, short form on Ghanaian sample, using confirmatory factor analysis, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and structured latent means analysis. On preschool sample (N = 2583; Mage = 4.29, SD = 1.34) from 10 regions, the scale’s measurement invariance is tested across age, gender, and school types. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure: closeness and conflict. The proposed two-factor model is found to be valid and reliable in the Ghanaian preschool context. Partial strong factorial equivalence across age, gender, and school types was identified in the findings. Significant differences in teacher–child relationship quality were found between boys and girls, and school types. The results provide implications for early childhood education stakeholders in Ghana. Also, it adds to the evidence of cross-cultural applicability of the student–teacher relationship scale—short form.

Keywords

Teacher–child relationship Student–teacher relationship scale (STRS-SF) Factorial validity Latent means comparison 

Notes

References

  1. Aboagye, M. O., Qin, J., Qayyum, A., Antwi, C. O., Jababu, Y., & Affum-Osei, E. (2018). Teacher burnout in pre-schools: A cross-cultural factorial validity, measurement invariance and latent mean comparison of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, Educators Survey (MBI-ES). Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 186–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.041.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical subpopulation differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 488–499.Google Scholar
  3. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52(3), 317–332.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.545.Google Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM SPSS Amos 22 User’s Guide IBM Corp, 673.Google Scholar
  6. Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 4, 40–79.  https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054.Google Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Reasearch in Personality, 27(6), 49–87.Google Scholar
  8. Beyazkurk, D., & Kesner, J. E. (2005). Teacher-child relationship in Turkish and United States school: A cross-cultural study. International Education Journal, 6(5), 554–574.Google Scholar
  9. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5.Google Scholar
  10. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher-child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 934–946.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934.Google Scholar
  11. Brady, B. A., Tucker, C. M., Harris, Y. R., & Tribble, I. (1992). Association of academic achievement with behavior among black students and white students. Journal of Educational Research Research, 86(1), 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941826.Google Scholar
  12. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage. Buys.Google Scholar
  13. Buyse, E., Verschueren, K., Doumen, S., Van Damme, J., & Maes, F. (2008). Classroom problem behavior and teacher-child relationships in kindergarten: The moderating role of classroom climate. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 367–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.009.Google Scholar
  14. Byrne, M. B., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. O. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3) 456–466.Google Scholar
  15. Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Buyse, E. (2015). Child engagement in the transition to school: Contributions of self-regulation, teacher–child relationships and classroom climate. Early Childhood Research Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.01.008.Google Scholar
  16. Chapman, R. (2016). A case study of gendered play in preschools: how early childhood educators’ perceptions of gender influence children’s play. Early Child Development and Care, 186(8), 1271–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1089435.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.Google Scholar
  18. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of- fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982a). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55(2), 65–76.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2112288.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, J. S., Kilgore, S. B., & Hoffer, T. (1982b). Public and private schools. Society, 19(2), 4–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712901.Google Scholar
  21. Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002.Google Scholar
  22. Corten, R., & Dronkers, J. (2006). School achievement of pupils from the lower strata in public, private government-dependent and private government-independent schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 179–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600587032.Google Scholar
  23. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.Google Scholar
  24. Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work, 26(2006), 429–436.Google Scholar
  25. Drugli, M. B. (2013). How are closeness and conflict in student—teacher relationships associated with demographic factors, school functioning and mental health in norwegian schoolchildren aged 6–13? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656276.Google Scholar
  26. Drugli, M. B., & Hjemdal, O. (2013). Factor structure of the student-teacher relationship scale for norwegian school-age children explored with confirmatory factor analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(5), 457–466.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656697.Google Scholar
  27. Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Classroom interactions: gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject, 45(November 2001), 579–580.Google Scholar
  28. Ewing, A. R., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher-child relationship quality and children’s behavioral adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(1), 92–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.09.002.Google Scholar
  29. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  31. Fraire, M., Longobardi, C., Prino, L. E., & Sclavo, E. (2013). La escala “ Student-Teacher Relationship Scale” dentro del contexto italiano: Un estudio de validez factorial, 11(31), 851–882.Google Scholar
  32. Fraire, M., Longobardi, C., Prino, L. E., Sclavo, E., & Settanni, M. (2013b). Examining the student-teacher relationship scale in the italian context: A factorial validity study. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(3), 851–882.  https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.31.13105.Google Scholar
  33. Gignac, G. E. (2009). Partial confirmatory factor analysis: Described and illustrated on the NEO-PI-R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 40–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484126.Google Scholar
  34. Goldhaber, D. A. N. D. (1996). Public and private high schools: Is school choice an answer to the productivity problem?15(2), 93–109.Google Scholar
  35. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.Google Scholar
  36. Gregoriadis, A., & Nikolaos, T. (2008). Applicability of the student—Teacher relationship scale (STRS) in the Greek educational setting. Journal of Psychoeducational, 26(2), 108–120.Google Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301.Google Scholar
  39. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Mashburn, A. J. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of conflict with young students: Looking beyond problem behaviors. Social Development.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00418.x.Google Scholar
  40. Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2) 91–105.Google Scholar
  41. Howes, C. (2000). Social-emotional classroom climate in child care, child-teacher relationships and children’s second grade peer relations. Social Development, 9(2), 191–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00119.Google Scholar
  42. Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Philipsen, L. C. (1998). Stability and continuity of child-caregiver and child-peer relationships. Child Development, 69(2), 418–426.Google Scholar
  43. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.Google Scholar
  44. Jerome, E. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Teacher-Child Relationships from Kindergarten to Sixth Grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development. 18(4), 915–945.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x.Google Scholar
  45. Koch, J. (2003). Gender issues in the classroom. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Educational psychology Handbook of psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Koomen, H. M. Y., Verschueren, K., van Schooten, E., Jak, S., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Validating the student-teacher relationship scale: Testing factor structure and measurement invariance across child gender and age in a Dutch sample. Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 215–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.001.Google Scholar
  47. Kopp, C. B. (1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 343–354.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.343.Google Scholar
  48. Lessard, A., Poirier, M., & Fortin, L. (2010). Student-teacher relationship: A protective factor against school dropout. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2010), 1636–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.250.Google Scholar
  49. Maccallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling of fit involving a particular measure of model. Psychological Methods, 13(2), 130–149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.Google Scholar
  50. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45(4), 513–520.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513.Google Scholar
  51. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825.Google Scholar
  52. Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11), S69–S77.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.Google Scholar
  53. Milatz, A., Glüer, M., Harwardt-heinecke, E., Kappler, G., & Ahnert, L. (2014). The Student – Teacher Relationship Scale revisited: Testing factorial structure, measurement invariance and validity criteria inGerman-speaking samples. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 357–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.003.Google Scholar
  54. Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor-analysis of non-normal likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(NOV), 171–189.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x.Google Scholar
  55. Pianta, R. C. (1994). Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 32(1), 15–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(94)90026-4.Google Scholar
  56. Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student-teacher relationship scale (STRS): Professional manual.Google Scholar
  57. Pianta, R.C., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 625–653). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 57, 61–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219925706.Google Scholar
  59. Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004a). Teacher-child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444–458.  https://doi.org/10.1037/10314-000.Google Scholar
  60. Pianta, R., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004b). Conceptualizing risk in relational terms: Associations among the quality of child-adult relationships prior to school entry and children’s developmental outcomes in first grade. Educational and School Psychology, 21, 32–45.Google Scholar
  61. Rey, R. B., Smith, A. L., Yoon, J., Somers, C., & Barnett, D. (2007). Relationships between teachers and Urban African American children the role of informant. School Psychology International, 28(3), 346–364.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307078545.Google Scholar
  62. Rydell, A. M., Bohlin, G., & Thorell, L. B. (2005). Representations of attachment to parents and shyness as predictors of children’s relationships with teachers and peer competence in preschool. Attachment and Human Development, 7(2), 187–204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500134282.Google Scholar
  63. Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347–363.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406661.Google Scholar
  64. Sassenrath, J., Croce, M., & Penaloza, M. (1984). Private and public school students: Longitudinal achievement differences? American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 557–563.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021003557.Google Scholar
  65. Settanni, M., Longobardi, C., Sclavo, E., Fraire, M., & Prino, L. E. (2015). Development and psychometric analysis of the student—teacher relationship scale—short form. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(June), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00898.Google Scholar
  66. Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher-child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 39–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.11.003.Google Scholar
  67. Solheim, E., Berg-Nielsen, T. S., & Wichstrøm, L. (2012). The three dimensions of the student-teacher relationship scale: CFA validation in a preschool sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 250–263.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911423356.Google Scholar
  68. Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher-student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 363–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.12.002.Google Scholar
  69. Webb, M. L., & Neuharth-pritchett, S. (2011). Examining factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Student—Teacher relationship scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.09.004.Google Scholar
  70. Whitaker, R. C., Dearth-Wesley, T., & Gooze, R. A. (2015). Workplace stress and the quality of teacher-children relationships in Head Start. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.08.008.Google Scholar
  71. Witte, F. J. (1992). Private school versus public school achievement: Are there findings that should affect the educational choice debate?11(4), 371–394.Google Scholar
  72. Zhang, X., & Nurmi, J. (2012). Teacher – child relationships and social competence: A two-year longitudinal study of Chinese preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 125–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.03.001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Osei Aboagye
    • 1
  • Jinliang Qin
    • 1
  • Simona Pekárková
    • 2
  • Collins Opoku Antwi
    • 3
  • Yasin Jababu
    • 4
    Email author
  • Kotor Asare
    • 5
  • Emmanuel Affum-Osei
    • 6
  • Nila Akinyi
    • 7
  1. 1.Zhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaChina
  2. 2.The University of Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzech Republic
  3. 3.University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  4. 4.North Carolina A&T State UniversityGreensboroUSA
  5. 5.University of EducationWinnebaGhana
  6. 6.The Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  7. 7.Maasai Mara UniviersityNarokKenya

Personalised recommendations