Psychological Studies

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 30–40 | Cite as

A Preliminary Study on the Effects of Strength-Based Career Workshop with LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® in Taiwan

  • Payling HarnEmail author
Research in Progress


This study aimed to explore the applications and effects on strength-based career workshop with LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® (LSP). The researcher adopted a single group of experimental design and a group LegoViews to collect qualitative and quantitative data for cross-validation. The researcher facilitated LSP strength-based career workshop with seven Taiwanese adults. Then, the researcher adopted “career hope scale,” “positive and negative affect schedule”, and “critical positive ratio checklist” to evaluate the effectiveness of workshop. The previous three scales were utilized for surveying at three time points, respectively, which were before the workshop started 3 days ago, after the workshop finished 3 weeks later, and after the workshop finished 3 days later, as pretest, posttest, and follow-up test. The researcher adopted repeated measures one-way ANOVA for measuring the effects of change. Finally, the researcher applied the Group LegoViews for 1 hour to explore the connotations of change by content analysis method. According to the research results, participants significantly presented delay effect in negative affect and immediate effect in critical positive ratio, but no significant differences in positive effect and career hope. Furthermore, the textual information collected from the LegoViews revealed LSP strength-based career workshop could improve positive emotional effects of “Concreting Construction, Promoting Positive,” “Multiple Linking, Broadening Thinking,” and “Perceiving Displacement, Eliminating Negative”; and career hope constructions of “Calling Original Intention, Career Anchoring,” “Multiple Trade-offs, Dreams into Reality,” and “Linking Nurturing Relationships, Deepening Empowerment.”


LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® Strength Career LegoViews 



  1. Baumgardner, S., & Crothers, M. (2009). Positive psychology. London, England: Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Bertini, P. (2013). Legoviews: A LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY™ based interviewing technique. Paper presented at the LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY™ certified facilitators’ annual meeting, Billund, Denmark. Retrieved from Accessed 23 June 2016
  3. Burgi, P., & Roos, J. (2003). Images of strategy. European Management, 21(1), 69–78.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, J. M., Su, H. C., & Chang, J. H. (2016). The exploration of lego serious play for promoting young children’s learning. Yu Da Academic Journal, 43(2), 63–86.Google Scholar
  5. Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research In organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dai, C. Y. (2011). College major’s frustration, resiliency, and students’ career hope: A study of universities’ students in north Taiwan (Master’s dissertation). Retrieved from Accessed 23 June 2016
  7. Fitzpartick, M. R., & Stalikas, A. (2008). Positive emotions as generator of therapeutic changes. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(2), 137–154.Google Scholar
  8. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden and build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.Google Scholar
  9. Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Three rivers press.Google Scholar
  10. Fredrickson, B. L., & Levenson, R. W. (1998). Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequel of negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12(2), 191–220.Google Scholar
  11. Frick, E., Tardini, S., & Cantoin, L. (2013). White paper on LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®: A state of the art of its application in Europe. Retrieved July 23, 2016 from
  12. Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Harn, P. L. (2017). A preliminary study of the empowerment effects of strength-based LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® on two Taiwanese adult survivors by earlier domestic violence. Psychological Studies, 62(2), 142–151.Google Scholar
  14. Harn, P. L., Syu, T. R., Lin, W. L., Yang, L. H., Han, S. J., Ni, J. N., et al. (2016). Strength and empowerment card. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.Google Scholar
  15. Kristiansen, P., & Rasmussen, R. (2014). Building a better business using the serious play method. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Mads, B., & Boniwell, I. (2014). Build and share introduced: Explore positive psychology with LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. Retrieved June 23, 2017 from
  17. McGregor, I., McAdam, D. P., & Little, B. R. (2006). Personal project, life stories, and happiness: On being true to traits. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 28(2), 242–250.Google Scholar
  18. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentimihalyi (Ed.), Flow and foundations of positive psychology (pp. 227–263). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B., Loftus, G., & Wagenaar, W. (2010). Atkinson & Hilgard’s introduction to psychology. Singapore: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  20. Peabody, M. A. (2015). Building with purpose: Using LEGO serious play in play therapy supervision. International Journal of Play Therapy, 24(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Roos, J., Victor, B., & Statler, M. (2004). Playing seriously with strategy. Long Range Planning, 37(6), 549–568.Google Scholar
  23. Rust, T., Diessner, R., & Reade, L. (2009). Strength only or strength and relative weaknesses? A preliminary study. Journal of Psychology, 143(5), 465–476.Google Scholar
  24. Schulz, K. P., Gelthner, S., Woelfe, C., & Krzywinskl, J. (2015). Toolkit-based modeling and serious play as means to foster creativity in innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  25. Schutt, D. A. (2007). A strength-based approach to career development using appreciative inquiry. Broken Arrow: National Career Development Association.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, E. (2006). The strengths-based counseling model. Counsel Psychology, 34(1), 13–79.Google Scholar
  27. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.Google Scholar
  28. Sutton, J. (2012). When psychologist become builder. The Psychologist, 25(8), 600–603.Google Scholar
  29. Verbruggen, M., & Sels, L. (2010). The effectiveness of strength-centered career adjustment model for dual-career and life satisfaction after counseling. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, Y. C. (2013). The therapeutic effectiveness and the change process of a strength-centered career counseling model. Chinese Journal of Counseling and Guidance, 37(2), 125–156.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, Y. C. (2015). The effectiveness of strength-centered career counseling in junior high school students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(3), 311–332.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, Y. C., & Tien, H. L. (2011). The effectiveness of strength-centered career adjustment model for dual-career women in Taiwan. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(5), 467–479.Google Scholar
  33. Ward, C. C., & Reuter, T. (2011). Strength-centered counseling: Integrated postmodern approaches and skills with practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.Google Scholar
  35. Wong, J. (2006). Strengths-centered therapy: A social constructionist, virtue-based psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice and Training, 43(2), 133–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hsuan Chunag UiversityHsinchu CityTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations