pp 1–7 | Cite as

Improved Drive Capability of Silicon Nano Tube Tunnel FET Using Halo Implantation

  • Avtar Singh
  • Saurabh Chaudhary
  • Savitesh Madhulika SharmaEmail author
  • C. K. Sarkar
Original Paper


In this paper, we focus on the improvement of comprehensive device performance of Silicon Nanotube Tunnel Field Effect Transistor (NT_TFET) for ultra low power applications. In the design we have implanted 2nm Halo region at the source side of Si NT_TFET for improving the subthreshold swing and short channel effects (SCEs). To prove the concept, the performance of Silicon Nanowire tunnel FET (NW_TFET), Silicon Nanotube TFET without Halo (NT_TFET) and Silicon Nanotube TFET with halo (NT_FET_HALO) implant are compared. The impact of halo doping profile on the Subthreshold swing, ON and OFF current are investigated. Further, the degradation of OFF state current due to Halo doping is controlled by lightly doped drain.


TFET Nanowire Nanotube Tunnel FET Halo doping Source pocket Nanodevices 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank the Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Silchar, for their valuable support in carrying out this research work.


  1. 1.
    Kale S, Kondekar PN (2016) Superlattices and Microstructures Ferroelectric Schottky barrier tunnel FET with gate-drain underlap: proposal and investigation. Superlattices Microstructure 89:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boucart K, Ionescu AM (2007) Double-gate tunnel FET with high-K gate dielectric. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 54:1725–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh A, Chaudhary SK, Panday CK, Sharma SM, Sarkar CK (2019) Design and analysis of High K Silicon Nano Tube Tunnel FET Device IET Circuit, Devices and Systems (Accepted). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris H, Choi K, Mehta N, Chandolu A, Biswas N, Kipshidze G, Nikishin S, Gangopadhyay S (2002) HfO2 gate dielectric with 0.5 nm equivalent oxide thickness. Appl Phys LettGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Memisevic E, Svensson J, Hellenbrand M, Lind E, Wernersson L-E (2017) Vertical InAs/GaAsSb/GaSb Tunneling Field-Effect Transistor on Si with S = 48 mV/decade and Ion = 10μA/μm for Ioff = 1nA/μm at VDS = 0.3 V IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM. 19.1.1–19.1.4Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ionescu AM (2017) Nano-devices with advanced junction engineering and improved energy efficiency 17th. Int Workshop Junction Technol (IWJT): 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Y Tunneling field effect transistor (TFET) with ultra shallow pockets formed by asymmetric ion implantation and method of making same U.S. Patent 9252250 B2, Feb. 2, 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ashita SA, Loan MR (2018) A high-performance inverted-c tunnel junction FET with source–channel overlap pockets. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 65:763–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Der Agopian PG, Martino JA, Vandooren A (2017) Study of line- TFET analog performance comparing with other TFET and MOSFET architectures . Solid-State Electron 128:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Japa A, Majumder MK, Sahoo SK, Vaddi R (2019) Tunnel FET ambipolarity-based energy efficient and robust true random number generator against reverse engineering attacks . The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) 13:689– 695Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhowmick B (2019) Emerging device: FINFET, tunnel FET and their applications. CSI Trans on ICT 7:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy T, et al. (2016) Field-effect transistors built from all two-dimensional material components. ACS Nano 8:6259–6264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shan G, Wang Y, Huang W (2011) Electronic transport characteristics in silicon nanotube field-effect transistors. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 43:1655–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jossy AM, Vigneswaran T (2014) A perspective review of tunnel field effect transistor with steeper switching behavior and low off current (IOFF) for Ultra Low Power Applications 6: 2092–2104Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu M (2017) Two methods of tuning threshold voltage of bulk FinFETs with replacement high-k metal-gate stacks. Solid State Electron 129:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chandan K, Pandey DD, Chaudhury S (2018) Impact of dielectric pocket on analog and high-frequency performances of cylindrical gate-all-around tunnel FETs. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, The Electrochemical Society 7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guin S, Chattopadhyay A, Karmakar A, Mallik A (2014) Impact of a pocket doping on the device performance of a schottky tunneling field-effect transistor . IEEE Trans Electron Devices 61:2515–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fahad HM, Smith CE, Rojas JP, Hussain MM (2011) Silicon nanotube field effect transistor with core-shell gate stacks for enhanced high-performance operation and area scaling benefits . Nano Lett 119:4393–4399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tekleab D (2014) Device performance of silicon nanotube field effect transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett 35:506–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh Avtar, Pandey CK, Chaudhury S, Sarkar CK (2018) Effect of strain in silicon nanotube FET devices for low power applications. The European Phys J Appl PhysGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar N, Mushtaq U, Amin SI, Anand S (2019) Design and performance analysis of Dual-Gate All around Core-Shell Nanotube TFET. Superlattices and Microstructures 125:356–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karimi NV, Pourasad Y (2015) Tunneling carbon nanotube field effect transistor with asymmetric graded double halo doping in channel. Asym-GDH-T-CNTFET Procedia Material Science 11:287– 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tekleab D, Tran HH, Sleight JW, Chidambarrao D (2014) Silicon Nanotube MOSFET, US 8,866,266 B2Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yadav M, Bulusu A, Dasgupta S (2015) Super-threshold semi analytical channel potential model for DG tunnel FETGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghedini P, et al. (2017) Solid-state electronics study of line-TFET analog performance comparing with other TFET and MOSFET architectures . Solid State Electron 128:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Comm. Engg.C.V. Raman College of EngineeringBhubneshwarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Engg.National Institute of TechnologySilcharIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electronics and Comm. Engg.DVR & Dr. HS MIC College of TechnologyAndhra PradeshIndia
  4. 4.Electronics and Telecommunication Engg. Dept.Jadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations