Ternary Nanocomposite of SiO2/Fe3O4/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Adsorption of Malachite Green: Response Surface Modeling, Equilibrium Isotherms and Kinetics
- 8 Downloads
In the work, synthesis and application of the ternary nanocomposite of SiO2/Fe3O4/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (SFCNT) for adsorptive removal of malachite green (MG) from aqueous solutions are reported. A Box-Behnken experimental design with the variables of SFCNT dosage, contact time, pH and ionic strength was used to optimize the effects of the variables on the decolourization process. The results were satisfactorily fitted to a quadratic response surface model with R2 = 0.9735 and F = 36.78 which predicted the optimum conditions of operation (SFCNT dosage of 0.192 g L−1, contact time of 25.1 min, pH of 6.26, and 0.03 mol L−1 ionic strength) and the removal efficiency of 98.42 ± 0.18% was achieved. The adsorption data obtained for different MG concentrations showed good agreement with the pseudo-second order kinetic model (R2 > 0.99). The data were also fitted to different isotherms (Langmuir, Tempkin, Harkins-Jura, Jovanovic, Halsey and Freundlich) and the results of error analyses showed that Freundlich isotherm was the best model to describe the dye-nanocomposite adsorption system.
KeywordsMulti-walled carbon nanotubes Ternary nanocomposite Malachite green Adsorption Response surface modeling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Karimi R, Yousefi F, Ghaedi M, Dashtian K (2016) Back propagation artificial neural network and central composite design modeling of operational parameter impact for sunset yellow and azur (II) adsorption onto MWCNTS and MWCNTS-Pd-NPs: isotherm and kinetic study. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 159:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kleijnen JPC (2015) Response surface methodology, handbook of simulation optimization. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 31.Mitrowska K, Posyniak A (2004) Determination of malachite green and its metabolite, leucomalachite green, in fish muscle by liquid chromatography. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 48:173–176Google Scholar
- 34.Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter WG (2005) Statistics for experiments2nd edn. Wiley Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 42.Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so called adsorption of soluble substances. Ksver Veterskapsakad Handl 24:1–6Google Scholar
- 44.Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div 89:31–60Google Scholar
- 45.Kannan K, Sundaram MM, Sundaram (2001) Kinetics and mechanism of removal of methylene blue by adsorption on various carbons–a comparative study. Dyes Pigments 51: 25–40Google Scholar
- 49.Tempkin MI, Pyzhev V (1940) Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts. Acta Physiochimica USSR 12:327–356Google Scholar
- 53.Freundlich HZ (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:385–471Google Scholar
- 56.Treybal RE (1980) Mass transfer operations3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 63.Rajabi M, Mirza B, Mahanpoor K, Mirjalili M, Najafi F, Moradi O, Sadegh H, Shahryari-ghoshekandi R, Asif M, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Adsorption of malachite green from aqueous solution by carboxylate group functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: determination of equilibrium and kinetics parameters. J Ind Eng Chem 34:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar