Advertisement

Silicon

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 393–399 | Cite as

The Effect of Nonuniform Emitter Sheet Resistance on PERC Solar Cell Performance

  • Sofia TahirEmail author
  • Adnan Ali
  • Nasir Amin
  • Muhamad Imran Arshad
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this research work is to study the effects of non-uniform emitter sheet resistance on the performance of PERC solar cells. For this purpose, we used different simulation techniques including EDNA 2, MATLAB and Griddler 2.5 Pro. We calibrated the phosphorous doping profiles with Nmax of 4E20, 3.5E20, 3E20, 2.5E20, 2E20, 1.5E20 and 1E20 by using EDNA 2. The results show that the emitter saturation current densities are decreased for corresponding increase in sheet resistance during phosphorous diffusion. In this way we find a relationship between emitter sheet resistances and recombination current densities and developed a MATLAB function from it. By assuming maximum emitter sheet resistance and the corresponding minimum recombination current density at the centre of the cell, we determined their average values from the same MATLAB function. These average values were then used as input parameters for computer simulations Griddler 2.5 Pro, to assess the effect of non-uniformities in emitter sheet resistance and recombination currents on the performance of p- PERC solar cells. The open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current density, fill factor and efficiency are calculated as a function of the difference between the maximum and minimum value of emitter sheet resistance. The results show that the open-circuit voltage and the efficiency of p-PERC solar cell are decreased if the difference between maximum and minimum value of emitter sheet resistance is increased from 0.45 ohm/sq to 19.3 ohm/sq. Whereas the fill factor is increased for the corresponding increase in the difference between maximum and minimum value of emitter sheet resistance.

Keywords

Emitter sheet resistance Emitter saturation current density EDNA 2 MATLAB Griddler 2.5 Pro Passivated emitter rear cell (PERC) Silicon solar cell 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Bram Hoex, Deputy Head SPREE University of New South Wales Australia, for his sincere guidance during work at UNSW. The authors would like to acknowledge the HEC Pakistan for IRSIP scholarship to do research work at SPREE University of New South Wales Australia.

We would like to acknowledge Alex To, Ph.D scholar at SPREE University of New South Wales Australia, for his assistance in Matlab simulations.

References

  1. 1.
    Shanmugam V, Khanna A, Basu PK, Aberle AG, Mueller T, Wong J (2016) Impact of the phosphorus emitter doping profile on metal contact recombination of silicon wafer solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 147:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Werner S, Lohmüller E, Saint-Cast P, Greulich J, Weber J, Maier S, Wasmer S (2017) Key aspects for fabrication of p-type Cz-Si PERC solar cells exceeding 22% conversion efficiency. Submitted to EUPVSECGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li H, Kim K, Hallam B, Hoex B, Wenham S, Abbott M (2017) POCl3 diffusion for industrial Si solar cell emitter formation. Front Energy 11(1):42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV.net) (2015) Results 2015 Version 2. http://www.itrpv.net/Reports/Downloads/
  5. 5.
    Saint-Cast P, Werner S, Greulich J, Jäger U, Lohmüller E, Höffler H, Preu R (2017) Analysis of the losses of industrial-type PERC solar cells. Phys Status Solidi (a) 214(3):600708-n/aGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller M, Fischer G, Bitnar B, Steckemetz S, Schiepe R, Mühlbauer M, Schneiderlöchner E (2017) Loss analysis of 22%, efficient industrial PERC solar cells. Energy Procedia 124:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ye F, Deng W, Guo W, Liu R, Chen D, Chen Y, Altermatt PP (2016) 22.13% efficient industrial p-type mono PERC solar cell. In: 2016 IEEE 43rd photovoltaic specialists conference (PVSC). IEEE, pp 3360–3365Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghembaza H, Zerga A, Saïm R, Pasquinelli M (2018) Optimization of phosphorus emitter formation from POCl 3 diffusion for p-type silicon solar cells processing. Silicon 10(2):377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    To A, Tahir S, Garavaglia A, Li WM, Li X, Hoex B (2017) The effect of bifacial AlOx deposition on PERC solar cell performance. IEEE J Photovoltaics 7(6):1528–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shanmugam V, Mueller T, Aberle AG, Wong J (2015) Determination of metal contact recombination parameters for silicon wafer solar cells by photoluminescence imaging. Sol Energy 118:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McIntosh KR, Altermatt PP (2010) A freeware 1D emitter model for silicon solar cells. In: 2010 35th IEEE on photovoltaic specialists conference (PVSC). IEEE, pp. 002188–002193Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kimmerle A, Momtazur Rahman M, Werner S, Mack S, Wolf A, Richter A, Haug H (2016) Precise parameterization of the recombination velocity at passivated phosphorus doped surfaces. J Appl Phys 119 (2):025706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fell A, McIntosh KR, Altermatt PP, Janssen GJ, Stangl R, Ho-Baillie A, Fong KC (2015) Input parameters for the simulation of silicon solar cells in 2014. IEEE J Photovoltaics 5(4):1250–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saint-Cast P, Werner S, Greulich J, Jäger U, Lohmüller E, Höffler H, Preu R (2016) Analysis of the losses of industrial-type PERC solar cells. Phys Status Solidi (a) 214(3):201600708Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dullweber T, Gatz S, Hannebauer H, Falcon T, Hesse R, Schmidt J, Brendel R (2012) Towards 20%, efficient large-area screen-printed rear assivated silicon solar cells. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 20(6):630–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cuevas A (2012) Geometrical analysis of solar cells with partial rear contacts. IEEE J Photovoltaics 2 (4):485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuevas A (2013) Physical model of back line-contact front-junction solar cells. J Appl Phys 113(16):164502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saint-Cast P, Rüdiger M, Wolf A, Hofmann M, Rentsch J, Preu R (2010) Advanced analytical model for the effective recombination velocity of locally contacted surfaces. J Appl Phys 108(1):013705CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Tahir
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Adnan Ali
    • 2
  • Nasir Amin
    • 2
  • Muhamad Imran Arshad
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy EngineeringUNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Government College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations