Advertisement

Representation of women amongst speakers at the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society annual meeting: a retrospective analysis from 2007 to 2019

  • Gianni R. LorelloEmail author
  • Arun Parmar
  • Alana M. Flexman
Reports of Original Investigations

Abstract

Purpose

Despite an increase in the proportion of women entering the field of anesthesiology, women remain underrepresented in academic and leadership positions. Speaking at national and international conferences is an important component of academic visibility and promotion. To date, the gender representation of speakers at the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society (CAS) annual meeting has not been examined.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the representation of women amongst speakers at the CAS annual meeting between 2007 and 2019, inclusively. We also examined the representation of women in different subspecialty subject area symposia at each CAS annual meeting, and the gender composition of meeting symposia panels (i.e., groups of two or more speakers in a session) at the meeting.

Results

Overall, 28.5% (358/1,256) of speaker slots included women, similar to their representation in Canadian clinical anesthesiology over the study period (26.7%), and increasing significantly over the study period. Women were more highly represented as obstetric anesthesia speakers at the CAS annual meetings, with lower representation in cardiothoracic anesthesia, transplant anesthesia, and critical care symposia. Of the 311 meeting symposia, 146 (46%) were composed of all men speakers.

Conclusion

The representation of women speakers at the CAS annual meeting was similar to the representation of women in the anesthesiology workforce in Canada over the study period. Gender representation varied widely by subspecialty symposia, subject area, and women were absent from nearly half of all symposia at the CAS annual meetings, which are potential areas of future investigation and intervention.

Représentation féminine parmi les conférenciers du Congrès annuel de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes: une analyse rétrospective de 2007 à 2019

Résumé

Objectif

Malgré une augmentation de la proportion de femmes décidant de poursuivre une carrière en anesthésiologie, celles-ci demeurent sous-représentées dans les postes universitaires et de leadership. Le fait de présenter lors de congrès nationaux et internationaux est une composante importante de la visibilité et de l’obtention de promotions dans le milieu académique. À ce jour, la représentation hommes/femmes des conférenciers prenant la parole dans le cadre du Congrès annuel de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA) n’a pas été étudiée.

Méthode

Nous avons réalisé une analyse rétrospective de la présence des femmes parmi les conférenciers des congrès annuels de la SCA tenus de 2007 à 2019 inclusivement. Nous avons également examiné la représentation des femmes lors des divers symposiums de surspécialité de chaque congrès annuel de la SCA, et la composition hommes/femmes des panels des symposiums (c.-à-d. des groupes de deux conférenciers ou plus dans une séance) lors des congrès.

Résultats

Globalement, 28,5 % (358/1256) des créneaux de conférence incluaient des femmes, un chiffre qui reflète bien leur représentation en anesthésiologie clinique au Canada pour la période à l’étude (26,7 %); ce chiffre augmentait significativement au cours de la période étudiée. Les femmes étaient plus représentées parmi les conférenciers en anesthésie obstétricale lors des congrès annuels de la SCA, mais moins représentées en anesthésie cardiothoracique, en anesthésie pour transplantation et dans les symposiums de soins critiques. Sur les 311 symposiums de congrès, 146 (46 %) étaient composés exclusivement de conférenciers masculins.

Conclusion

La représentation de femmes conférencières lors des congrès annuels de la SCA était semblable à la représentation des femmes en anesthésiologie au Canada au cours de la période étudiée. La représentation hommes/femmes variait considérablement d’un symposium de surspécialité à un autre et les femmes étaient absentes de près de la moitié de tous les symposiums lors des congrès annuels de la SCA, ce qui constitue des domaines potentiels d’étude et d’intervention futures.

Notes

Author contributions

Gianni R. Lorello contributed to the study concept and design, primary data collection, analysis and data interpretation, manuscript drafting, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. Arun Parmar contributed to the primary data collection and to verification, analysis, and interpretation of data. Alana M. Flexman contributed to the study concept and design, primary data verification, statistical analyses, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Ms. Debra Thomson, Executive Director of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society, for assistance in obtaining these data.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding statement

None.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Supplementary material

12630_2019_1524_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (93 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 92 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Mascarenhas A, Moore JE, Tricco AC, et al. Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study. CMAJ Open 2017; 5: E144-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooke M. Implicit bias in academic medicine: #WhatADoctorLooksLike. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 657-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA 2015; 314: 1149-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Qadri U, Arora VM. Comparison of male vs female resident milestone evaluations by faculty during emergency medicine residency training. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 651-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender differences in attending physicians’ feedback to residents: a qualitative analysis. J Grad Med Educ 2017; 9: 577-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flexman AM, Parmar A, Lorello GR. Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 495-502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller J, Chuba E, Deiner S, DeMaria S Jr, Katz D. Trends in authorship in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg 2019; 129: 306-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of academic medical faculty. JAMA 2016; 315: 2120-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM R 2017; 9: 804-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176: 1294-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, Sambuco D, DeCastro R, Ubel PA. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA 2012; 307: 2410-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lorello GR, Parmar A, Flexman AM. Representation of women on the editorial board of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis from 1954 to 2018. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 989-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galley HF, Colvin LA. Next on the agenda: gender. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 139-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lorello GR, Flexman AM. 75 years of leadership in the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society: a gender analysis. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 843-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1611-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? Q J Econ 2009; 124: 1497-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkatesh B, Mehta S, Angus DC, et al. Women in intensive care study: a preliminary assessment of international data on female representation in the ICU physician workforce, leadership and academic positions. Crit Care 2018. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2139-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D, Herridge M, Owais S, Metaxa V. The speaker gender gap at critical care conferences. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 991-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moeschler SM, Gali B, Goyal S, et al. Speaker gender representation at the American Society of Anesthesiology annual meeting: 2011-2016. Anesth Analg 2019; 129: 301-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruzycki SM, Fletcher S, Earp M, Bharwani A, Lithgow KC. Trends in the proportion of female speakers at medical conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2019. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. NY: Routledge; 1999 .Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wenneras C, Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 1997; 387: 341-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cambridge Dictionary. About Words. Available from URL: https://dictionaryblog.cambridge.org/2017/10/30/new-words-30-october-2017/ (accessed September 2019).
  24. 24.
    Nittrouer CL, Hebl MR, Ashburn-Nardo L, Trump-Steele RC, Lane DM, Valian V. Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115: 104-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kass D, Choo EK. When will we have enough women speakers in emergency medicine? Emerg Med J 2016. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Canadian Medical Association. Available from URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian%20Medical%20Association (accessed September 2019).
  27. 27.
    Coates J, Cameron D. Women in Their Speech Communities. Routledge; 2014.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaw S. Language and gender in political debates in the House of Commons. Doctoral thesis, Institute of Education, University of London 2002.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mills S. Discourse. Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineToronto Western Hospital, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaThe University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.The Wilson CentreTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of AnesthesiologyVancouver General HospitalVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  6. 6.Toronto Western HospitalUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations