Advertisement

Potential impact of changes in administrative database coding methodology on research and policy decisions: an example from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan

  • Ana P. Johnson
  • Brian Milne
  • Marlo Whitehead
  • Jianfeng Xu
  • Joel L. ParlowEmail author
Correspondence

To the Editor,

Reliable and complete data are needed for monitoring and evaluating the provision of healthcare services, physician and hospital remuneration, and service planning.1 In the Canadian province of Ontario, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) houses healthcare administrative databases obtained from physician and hospital billing records from a single-payer public health insurance physician reimbursement system, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP). These databases may be linked, using unique patient identifiers, to a number of other databases. Such databases, containing data points such as procedures, diagnostic codes, as well as costing and resource utilization, are often used for research purposes that may subsequently inform clinical care and policy decisions. Within the medical specialties, a vast array of data related to the field of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine are accessible.2,3Nevertheless, researchers need to be wary of the...

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. We would like to acknowledge Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof, Dana Thompson-Green, Emilie Piarenosa, and Mahrukh Abid for their contributions to the project.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

References

  1. 1.
    Assareh H, Achat HM, Guevarra VM, Stubbs JM. Effect of change in coding rules on recording diabetes in hospital administrative datasets. Int J Med Informatics 2016; 94: 182-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McIsaac DI, Wijeysundera DN, Huang A, Bryson GL, van Walraven C. Association of the hospital volume of frail surgical patients cared for with outcomes after elective, major noncardiac surgery: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 602-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Leary JD, Dexter F, Faraoni D, Crawford MW. Incidence of non-physiologically complex surgical procedures performed in children: an Ontario population-based study of health administration data. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 23-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quan H, Li B, Saunders LD, et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res 2008; 43: 1424-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ontario Ministry of Health; Ministry of Long-Term Care. Schedule of Benefits. Physician Services Under the Health Insurance Act. Available from URL: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/sob/physserv/physserv_mn.html (accessed October 2019).

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Queen’sQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Public Health SciencesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative MedicineQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations