Advertisement

Quality and patient safety committee structure and activities in an academic department of anesthesiology: a narrative description

  • Christopher L. PysykEmail author
  • Lucie Filteau
  • Alan Baxter
Special Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Quality and patient safety (QPS) activities continue to attract more attention and are deemed an essential component of care provision by all departments of anesthesiology, but examples of the structure and processes to manage QPS matters at the department level in Canada are not well described in the literature. This narrative article highlights the creation, structure, evolution, and experiences of a QPS committee in a Canadian department of anesthesiology and pain medicine. Specific focus and case examples of the QPS committee’s use of a hospital-wide incident reporting system to monitor and respond to perioperative QPS matters are provided.

Structure et activités d’un comité responsable de la qualité de l’acte et de la sécurité des patients dans un département d’anesthésiologie universitaire : une description narrative

Résumé

Les activités de gestion de la qualité de l’acte et de la sécurité des patients (QSP) continuent d’attirer de plus en plus d’attention et sont considérées comme une composante essentielle de la prestation de soins par tous les départements d’anesthésiologie, mais les exemples de la structure et des processus pour gérer les questions de QSP au niveau départemental au Canada ne sont pas bien décrits dans la littérature. Cet article narratif met en lumière la création, la structure, l’évolution et les expériences d’un comité responsable de la QSP dans un département d’anesthésiologie et de traitement de la douleur canadien. Nous mettons une emphase particulière et présentons des exemples de scénario sur l’utilisation du comité de QSP d’un système de rapport d’incidents à l’échelle de l’hôpital afin de surveiller et de répondre aux questions de QSP périopératoires.

Notes

Funding

Each author has received support for Non-Clinical Time related to QPS committee activities from the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at The Ottawa Hospital.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any commercial or non-commercial affiliations or conflicts of interest related to the manuscript. None of the authors have received consultancies related to the opinions or matters presented in the manuscript.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to all aspects of this manuscript, including study conception and design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; and drafting the article.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

References

  1. 1.
    Boudreaux AM, Vetter TR. The creation and impact of a dedicated section on quality and patient safety in a clinical academic department. Acad Med 2013; 88: 173-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathews SC, Demski R, Hooper JE, et al. A model for the departmental quality management infrastructure within an academic health system. Acad Med 2017; 92: 608-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA. Creating a fractal-based quality management infrastructure. J Health Organ Manag 2014; 28: 576-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang MC, Hyun JK, Harrison M, Shortell SM, Fraser I. Redesigning health systems for quality: lessons from emerging practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32: 599-611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 76-104.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beattie WS, Culwick MD, Grocott HP. Canadian Anesthesia Incident Reporting System (CAIRS): the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society’s National Patient Safety Initiative. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 749-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwok ES, Calder LA, Barlow-Krelina E, et al. Implementation of a structured hospital-wide morbidity and mortality rounds model. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26: 439-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Government of Ontario. Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004, S.O. 2004, chapter 3, Schedule A. Available from URL: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/04p03#BK44 (accessed July 2019).
  9. 9.
    Moloo H, Brooke R, Sundaresan S, et al. Enabling front line-driven perioperative quality improvement through organizational infrastructure built around the Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program. Can J Surg 2016; 59: 422-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 193-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belcaid I, Poulton A, Pysyk CL. Documentation of perioperative resuscitation status for non-elective surgical patients. J Clin Anesth 2018; 49: 71-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miao I, Jee R, Pysyk CL. Under pressure: an audit of airway device pressures. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 726-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pysyk CL. A change to the surgical safety checklist to reduce patient identification errors. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 219-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pysyk CL. Risk of look-a-like equipment in anesthesiology: it’s not just medications. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 1291-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pysyk CL, Abdulla KR, Boet S. Goldilocks and the perioperative patient: not too hot, not too cold. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2017; 61: 460-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), American College of Surgeons. Available from URL: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip (accessed July 2019).
  17. 17.
    Wheeler K, Baxter A, Boet S, Pysyk C, Bryson GL. Performance feedback in anesthesia: a post-implementation survey. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 681-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pysyk CL, Corsi DJ, Boet S. The potential for anesthesiologist practice feedback to reduce postoperative vomiting in an academic centre. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 609-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27: 759-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015. Available from URL: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/canmeds/canmeds-full-framework-e.pdf (accessed July 2019).

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher L. Pysyk
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lucie Filteau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alan Baxter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineThe Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations