Advertisement

Representation of women on the editorial board of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis from 1954 to 2018

  • Gianni R. LorelloEmail author
  • Arun Parmar
  • Alana M. Flexman
Correspondence

To the Editor,

Editorial board membership is prestigious in academic medicine. The National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine has called for “reasonable representation of women on editorial boards and in other…leadership positions.”1 Although women represent an increasing proportion of anesthesiologists in Canada,2 women remain poorly represented in senior leadership positions.3 We compared the proportion of women on the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (CJA) editorial board with the proportion of women anesthesiologists in Canada over time.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the gender of the CJA editorial board members since inception (1954) to 2018. Ethical approval was not required as we included publicly available data. We assigned gender as previously described.4 Editorial board membership was determined by reviewing the journal mastheads of each year. We included the editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief, associate editor(s), statistical editor(s), French language editor, continuing professional development editor, board members, and guest editors. We assigned a “member-position” to each person on the board in each year. The concurrent proportion of women anesthesiologists in Canada was determined from Canadian Medical Association data.

We identified the editorial board in all years except 1983 and 1992 (editorial board not listed), and 2000 (print copy missing). We identified 985 member positions (i.e., members multiplied by the length of their corresponding term in years) and assigned a gender to all but 26 member positions (four individuals), leaving 959 member positions for analysis.

A total of 146 people made up 985 member positions of the CJA editorial board: 10% were (14/145) women and 88% (127/145) were men. Women comprised 6% (58/959) of member positions since 1954 (eTable, available as Electronic Supplementary Material). Members spent a median [interquartile range] of 6 [4–9] years on the editorial board, with men spending more time than women (7 [4–9] vs 3 [2–6] years). Since the first woman joined the board in 1996, women accounted for 11% (58/517) of member positions, ranging from a low of 0% (0/27) in 2014 to a high of 19% (5/27) in 2017 (Figure). Women made up 2% (1/58) of deputy/associate editor positions and 6% (6/108) of international member positions. The proportion of practicing anesthesiologists in Canada that were women increased from 20% in 1994 to 33% in 2018. The percentage of women anesthesiologists in Canada and women editorial board members were not correlated (Spearman rho, -0.0203; P = 0.93).
Figure

Proportion of women editorial board members over time. The red line depicts the proportion of women anesthesiologists in Canada since 1994 (provided by the Canadian Medical Association). Data were not included in the figure prior to 1990 because no women were on the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia editorial board prior to 1996

Despite an increasing number of women in anesthesiology in Canada, our data show that women remain underrepresented on the CJA editorial board, a finding not unique to the CJA and consistent with other journals. In 2011, 15% of women constituted the editorial board of five major anesthesia-related journals, ranging from 7% (Anesthesia and Analgesia) to 24% (European Journal of Pain).5

The underrepresentation of women in our study may reflect a lower level of women participating in academic anesthesiology.4 Nevertheless, women have authored 25–29% of original articles in the CJA in recent decades,4 similar to the proportion of women anesthesiologists in Canada. Women make up a relatively lower proportion of older anesthesiologists,2 which may partially account for our findings. Determining the optimal proportion of women on editorial boards is difficult,5 and editorial boards must balance all axes of diversity, including, but not limited to, gender, region, ethnicity, language, and sexual orientation. One should not come at the expense of another.

Limitations of this study include our inability to determine the proportion of women invited to the board vs the proportion of those invited who declined, and the proportion of women active in academic medicine. The proportion of women practicing anesthesiology is limited by sampling techniques.

Although not included in our data, we note that the 2019 CJA editorial board has encouragingly increased to 25% women. The reasons behind this pervasive underrepresentation are multifactorial and further examination is urgently required to identify strategies to increase the participation of women on editorial boards.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and Ms. Debra Thompson for providing access to the full print collection of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Supplementary material

12630_2019_1378_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (117 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 117 kb) eTABLE Representation of women on the CJA editorial board between 1954 and 2018

References

  1. 1.
    National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Beyond Bias and Barriers. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mottiar M. Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 953-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorello GR, Flexman AM. 75 years of leadership in the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society: a gender analysis. Can J Anesth 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01359-y.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flexman AM, Parmar A, Lorello GR. Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 495-502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amrein K, Langmann A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber TR, Zollner-Schwetz I. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gender Med 2011; 8: 378-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaThe University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.The Wilson CentreTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of AnesthesiologyVancouver General HospitalVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative CareThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations