Novel markings on the unit package of uncuffed pediatric tracheal tubes

  • Swapnil Awsar
  • Karen BrownEmail author
To the Editor,


Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.


  1. 1.
    Loew A, Thibeault DW. A new and safe method to control the depth of endotracheal intubation in neonates. Pediatrics 1974; 54: 506-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griscom NT, Wohl ME. Dimensions of the growing trachea related to age and gender. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 233-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sirisopana M, Saint-Martin C, Wang NN, Manoukian J, Nguyen LH, Brown KA. Novel measurements of the length of the subglottic airway in infants and young children. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 462-70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fearon B, Whalen JS. Tracheal dimensions in the living infant (preliminary report). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 965-74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiss M, Gerber AC, Dullenkopf A. Appropriate placement of intubation depth marks in a new cuffed paediatric tracheal tube. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 80-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rigo V, Fayoux P. Distances from vocal cords to mid-trachea for optimizing endotracheal tubes depth markers according to gestational age. Paediatr Anaesth 2018; 28: 361-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mariano ER, Ramamoorthy C, Chu LF, Chen M, Hammer GB. A comparison of three methods for estimating appropriate tracheal tube depth in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15: 846-51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health CentreMontreal Children’s HospitalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations