Advertisement

Anesthesiology resident selection: identifying mandate and selection criteria in Saskatchewan

  • Mateen Raazi
  • Jennifer O’BrienEmail author
  • Derrick Williams
Correspondence
  • 12 Downloads

To the Editor,

Residency positions in Canada are filled using the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) in an algorithm that matches applicants to residency programs according to rank order lists dually generated by applicants and residency programs. Applicants provide detailed curricula vitae, lists of electives, personal letters, reference letters, transcripts, and medical student performance records (i.e., “Dean’s letters”). Residency programs review applicant files, shortlist applicants, and carry out interviews.

While there are credible indicators for success in medical school, evidence for predictors of success in postgraduate specialty training is limited and conflicting.1-3 The strongest evidence supports the use of academic records, multiple mini-interviews, situational judgement tests, and tests of clinical problem solving as selection tools.3Conflicting or varied evidence exists for aptitude tests, personal statements, some personality traits, and traditional...

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Supplementary material

12630_2019_1304_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (100 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 100 kb)
12630_2019_1304_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Patterson F, Roberts C, Hanson MD, et al. 2018 Ottawa consensus statement: selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions. Med Teach 2018; DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1498589.
  2. 2.
    Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, et al. Assessment for selection for the healthcare professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011; 33: 215-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts C, Khanna P, Rigby L, et al. Utility of selection methods for specialist medical training: a BEME (best evidence medical education) systematic review: BEME guide no. 45. Med Teach 2018; 40: 3-19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quintero AJ, Segal LS, King TS, Black KP. The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1364-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burns K, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008; 179: 245-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain ManagementUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations