Advertisement

Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 813–819 | Cite as

Principal Component Analysis of Stimulatory Effect of Synbiotic Combination of Indigenous Probiotic and Inulin on Antioxidant Activity of Soymilk

  • Shagun Choudhary
  • Manisha Singh
  • Deepak Sharma
  • Sampan Attri
  • Kavita Sharma
  • Gunjan GoelEmail author
Article

Abstract

The present study aimed to screen the indigenous probiotic cultures for their effect on total phenolic contents (TPC) and associated antioxidant activities in synbiotic fermented soymilk during storage. Among 16 cultures, subtractive screening was conducted based on different tests such as acidification rate and proliferation of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on supplementation of inulin (0–20 mM) and fructooligosaccharide (0–0.45 mM). Lactobacillus paracasei CD4 was selected as potential strain after principal component analysis (PCA) of different strains with prebiotic substrates at different concentrations. The strain was used for production of synbiotic soymilk product containing 10 mM inulin. The storage study was conducted at 4 °C for 21 days. During storage, the pH, titratable acidity, TPC, antioxidant activities, and viable cell counts (VCC) were determined. The fermentation of soymilk supplemented with 10 mM inulin did not alter the VCC; however, a decrease in pH and TPC and an increase in acidity and antioxidant activity were observed (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the synbiotic supplementation of inulin in soymilk enhanced the viability of Lactobacillus paracasei CD4 and antioxidant activity during storage under refrigeration conditions.

Keywords

Prebiotic Probiotic Antioxidant activity Principal component analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Jaypee University of Information Technology for providing essential facilities required for this research work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaheer K, Akhtar MH (2017) An updated review of dietary isoflavones: nutrition, processing, bioavailability and impacts on human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:1280–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao D, Shah NP (2014) Changes in antioxidant capacity, isoflavone profile, phenolic and vitamin contents in soymilk during extended fermentation. LWT-Food Sci Technol 58:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiao Y, Wang L, Rui X, Li W, Chen X, Jiang M, Dong M (2015) Enhancement of the antioxidant capacity of soy whey by fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum B1–6. J Funct Foods 12:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee M, Hong GE, Zhang H, Tang CY, Han KH, Mandal PK, Lee CH (2015) Production of the isoflavone aglycone and antioxidant activities in black soymilk using fermentation with Streptococcus thermophilus S10. Food Sci Biotechnol 24:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donkor ON, Nilmini SL, Stolic P, Vasiljevic T, Shah NP (2007) Survival and activity of selected probiotic organisms in set-type yoghurt during cold storage. Int Dairy J 17:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Battistini C, Gullón B, Ichimura ES, Gomes AM, Ribeiro EP, Kunigk L, Moreira JU, Jurkiewicz C (2017) Development and characterization of an innovative synbiotic fermented beverage based on vegetable soybean. Braz J Microbiol 49:303–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champagne CP, Green-Johnson J, Raymond Y, Barrette J, Buckley N (2009) Selection of probiotic bacteria for the fermentation of a soy beverage in combination with Streptococcus thermophilus. Food Res Int 42:612–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllärinen P, Crittenden R, Mogensen G, Fondén R, Saarela M (2002) Technological challenges for future probiotic foods. Int Dairy J 12:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma K, Mahajan R, Attri S, Goel G (2017) Selection of indigenous Lactobacillus paracasei CD4 and Lactobacillus gastricus BTM 7 as probiotic: assessment of traits combined with principal component analysis. J Appl Microbiol 122:1310–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhatnagar M, Attri S, Sharma K, Goel G (2018) Lactobacillus paracasei CD4 as potential indigenous lactic cultures with antioxidative and ACE inhibitory activity in soymilk hydrolysate. J Food Meas Charact 12:1005–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9715-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang S, Cai W, Xu B (2013) Food quality improvement of soy milk made from short-time germinated soybeans. Foods 2:198–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zoecklein BW, Fugelsang KC, Gump BH, Nury FS (1995) Wine analysis and production. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 16:144–158Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Bio Med 26:1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beal C, Skokanova J, Latrille E, Martin N, Corrieu G (1999) Combined effects of culture conditions and storage time on acidification and viscosity of stirred yogurt. J Dairy Sci 82:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kristo E, Biliaderis CG, Tzanetakis N (2003) Modelling of the acidification process and rheological properties of milk fermented with a yogurt starter culture using response surface methodology. Food Chem 83:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacob M, Jaros D, Rohm H (2011) Recent advances in milk clotting enzymes. Int J Dairy Technol 64:14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayad EHE, Nashat S, El-Sadek N, Metwaly H, El-Soda M (2004) Selection of wild lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Egyptian dairy products according to production and technological criteria. Food Microbiol 21:715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perrin S, Warchol M, Grill JP, Schneider F (2001) Fermentations of fructooligosaccharides and their components by Bifidobacterium infantis ATCC 15697 on batch culture in semi-synthetic medium. J Appl Microbiol 90:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imamura L, Hisamitsu K, Kobashi K (1994) Purification and characterization of β-fructofuranosidase from Bifidobacterium infantis. Biol Pharm Bull 17:596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliveira MN, Sodini I, Remeuf F, Corrieu G (2001) Effect of milk supplementation and culture composition on acidification, textural properties and microbiological stability of fermented milks containing probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J 11:935–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forouhandeh H, Vahed AZ, Hejazi MS, Nahaei MR, Dibavar MA (2010) Isolation and phenotypic characterization of Lactobacillus species from various dairy products. Curr Res Bacteriol 3:84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Makras L, Van Acker G, De Vuyst L (2005) Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei 8700: 2 degrades inulin-type fructans exhibiting different degrees of polymerization. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6531–6537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kailasapathy K, Sultana K (2009) Survival and β-galactosidase activity of encapsulated and free Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis in ice-cream. Aust J Dairy Technol 58:223–227Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novak L, Loubiere P (2000) The metabolic network of Lactococcus lactis: distribution of 14C-labeled substrates between catabolic and anabolic pathways. J Bacteriol 182:1136–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ostile HM, Treimo J, Narvhus JA (2003) Effect of temperature on growth and metabolism of probiotic bacteria in milk. Int Dairy J 15:989–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang YC, Yu RC, Yang HY, Chou CC (2003) Sugar and acid contents in soymilk fermented with lactic acid bacteria alone or simultaneously with bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol 20:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adolfsson O, Meydani SN, Russell RR (2004) Yogurt and gut function. Am J Clin Nutr 80:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Queirós LD, Macedo JA, Macedo GA (2016) A new biotechnological process to enhance the soymilk bioactivity. Food Sci Biotechnol 25:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Correia I, Nunes A, Duarte IF, Barros A, Delgadillo I (2005) Sorghum fermentation followed by spectroscopic techniques. Food Chem 90:853–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCue PP, Shetty K (2005) A model for the involvement of lignin degradation enzymes in phenolic antioxidant mobilization from whole soybean during solid-state bioprocessing by Lentinus edodes. Process Biochem 40:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Apostolidis E, Kwon YI, Ghaedian R, Shetty K (2007) Fermentation of milk and soymilk by Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus acidophilus enhances functionality for potential dietary management of hyperglycemia and hypertension. Food Biotechnol 21:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marazza JA, Nazareno MA, de Giori GS, Garro MS (2012) Enhancement of the antioxidant capacity of soymilk by fermentation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J Funct Foods 4:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee KH, Kim SH, Woo KS, Kim HJ, Choi HS, Kim YH, Song J (2016) Functional beverage from fermented soymilk with improved amino nitrogen, β-glucosidase activity and aglycone content using Bacillus subtilis starter. Food Sci Biotechnol 25:1399–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G (2010) Bioconversion of isoflavone glycosides to aglycones, mineral bioavailability and vitamin B complex in fermented soymilk by probiotic bacteria and yeast. J Appl Micorbiol 109:1198–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    You HJ, Ahn JY, Kim QQ, Wu GE (2015) High expression of β-glucosidase in Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and application in conversion of isoflavone glucosides during fermentation of soymilk. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen J, Wu Y, Yang C, Xu X, Meng Y (2017) Antioxidant and hypolipidemic effects of soymilk fermented via Lactococcus acidophilus MF204. Food and Func 8(12):4414–4420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shagun Choudhary
    • 1
  • Manisha Singh
    • 1
  • Deepak Sharma
    • 1
  • Sampan Attri
    • 1
  • Kavita Sharma
    • 1
  • Gunjan Goel
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology and BioinformaticsJaypee University of Information TechnologySolanIndia

Personalised recommendations