Multivariate Analysis of Increase in Life Span of Caenorhabditis elegans Through Intestinal Colonization by Indigenous Probiotic Strains
- 270 Downloads
The present study aimed to analyze the colonization potential of indigenous probiotic strains and to assess their effects on physiology of Caenorhabditis elegans. The protective effect of probiotics was evaluated in terms of increase in life span of the worm through colonization in the intestine. A total of 15 probiotic cultures were evaluated for their effect on mean life span, pharyngeal pumping, and normal reproduction behavior in the worms. The chemotactic behavior in terms of binary choice index was also evaluated. The adherence and colonization of the intestine of the worm by probiotics were monitored at different time intervals by enumerating the microbial population and fluorescent microscopic observations. The survival analysis-based Kaplan–Meier method indicated that the probiotic cultures increased the survival probability as compared to control strain E. coli OP50. There was no effect of feeding probiotics on physiological responses of the worm such as pharyngeal pumping and reproduction. The principal component analysis (PCA) of the results indicated Lactobacillus plantarum K90 and L. paracasei CD4 as potential probiotics with binary choice index of 0.8 as food preference of C. elegans. The strains exhibit higher adherence and colonization in the gut of worms and increased the life span by 5 days as compared to control E. coli OP50. In conclusion, feeding with probiotic cultures is effective in extending the lifespan of C. elegans; however, the colonization ability differs among the strains.
KeywordsCaenorhabditis elegans Life span Lactic acid bacteria Colonization
The authors wish to thank Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, for providing financial support and Jaypee University of Information Technology for essential facilities required for the research work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 5.Saxami G, Karapetsas A, Lamprianidou E, Kotsianidis I, Chlichlia A, Tassou C, Zoumpourlis V, Galanis A (2016) Two potential probiotic lactobacillus strains isolated from olive microbiota exhibit adhesion and anti-proliferative effects in cancer cell lines. J Funct Foods 24:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Carasi P, Díaz M, Racedo SM, De Antoni G, Urdaci MC, Serradell MD (2014) Safety characterization and antimicrobial properties of kefir-isolated Lactobacillus kefiri. Bio Med Res Int 13:2014Google Scholar
- 13.Grompone G, Martorell P, Llopis S, González N, Genovés S, Mulet AP, Fernández-Calero T, Tiscornia I, Bollati-Fogolín M, Chambaud I, Foligné B (2012) Anti-inflammatory Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 strain protects against oxidative stress and increases lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 7:e52493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71–94Google Scholar
- 22.Metchnikoff, II, (2004) The prolongation of life: optimistic studies. Springer Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 34.Song BM, Avery L (2013) The pharynx of the nematode C. elegans: a model system for the study of motor control. Worm 2:e21833Google Scholar
- 35.Mörck C, Pilon MC (2006) C. elegans feeding defective mutants have shorter body lengths and increased autophagy. BMC Dev Biol 6:39Google Scholar
- 36.De Vrese M, Schrezenmeir J (2008) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 111:1–66Google Scholar