Advertisement

Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 43–54 | Cite as

Newly Isolated Lactobacilli strains from Algerian Human Vaginal Microbiota: Lactobacillus fermentum Strains Relevant Probiotic’s Candidates

  • Liza Ouarabi
  • Yasmina Ait Chait
  • Hamza Ait Seddik
  • Djamel Drider
  • Farida BendaliEmail author
Article

Abstract

Lactobacilli strains are considered as a preventive means for treatment of vaginal infections or post-antibiotic treatment to repopulate the vaginal mucosa. This study aimed at establishing the vaginal lactobacillus profile of Algerian women with different vaginal diseases. Afterwards, lactobacilli isolated from swabs were in vitro characterized for their probiotic hallmarks. This prospective study allowed isolation of 44 Lactobacillus strains and 160 potentially pathogens, among which are Escherichia coli (50 isolates), Staphylococcus sp. (38 isolates), Enterococcus sp. (16 isolates), and Candida sp. (56 isolates). All Lactobacilli strains were characterized for their antagonism, adhesion to polystyrene, and resistance to acidity and bile. Consequently, six Lactobacillus strains (Lb. fermentum 5LB4, 5LB10, 5LB12, Lb. plantarum 5LB2, 5LB11, and Lactobacillus sp. 4LB9) were moderately or weakly adherent, and 35 potentially pathogens exhibited weak to strong adhesion to polystyrene. Antagonism was recorded for 36 Lactobacillus strains towards E. coli 6E2, S. aureus 7S3, Enterococcus sp. 5EN8, and Candida albicans C1 used as indicator organisms. Finally, Lb. fermentum 9LB6, 4LB16, and 10LB1 and Lb. plantarum 9LB4 were remarkable for their inhibitory activity, absence of hemolytic potential, and for their resistance to acidity (pH 1.5) and bile (0.5%) harsh conditions.

Keywords

Vaginal microbiota Lactobacilli Probiotic Antagonism 

Notes

Funding Information

Experiments performed at Charles Violette Institute (Lille University) were funded by CPER/FEDER Alibiotech program (2016-2020). Those performed in Algeria were funded by the Algerian Ministry of High Education and Scientific Research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Petricevic L, Domig K, Nierscher F, Sandhofer M, Fidesser M, Kro-ndorfer I, Husslein P, Kneifel W, Kiss H (2014) Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep 4(1):5136.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al Kassaa I, Hamze M, Hober D, Chihib NE, Drider D (2014) Identification of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties isolated from women in North Lebanon. Microb Ecol 67(3):722–734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0384-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamińska D, Gajecka M (2017) Is the role of human female reproductive tract microbiota underestimated? Benefic Microbes 8(3):327–343.  https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2015.0174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Witkin SS, Linhares IM (2017) Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG 124(4):606–611.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, Foster JA, Forney LJ (2007) Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J 1(2):121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ (2011) Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Supplement_1):4680–4687.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002611107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lepargneur JP (2016) Lactobacillus crispatus as biomarker of the healthy vaginal tract. Ann Biol Clin 74:421–427Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S (2017) Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 25(3):182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Blanc R-M (2009) Détecter des infections génitales basses chez la femme. Option Biologie 424:19–20Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller EA, Beasley DE, Dunn RR, Archie EA (2016) Lactobacilli dominance and vaginal pH: why is the human vaginal microbiome unique? Front Microbiol 7:1936.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01936 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tachedjian G, Aldunate M, Bradshaw CS, Cone RA (2017) The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001
  12. 12.
    FAO/WHO (2006) Probiotics in food. Health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. FAO Food and Nutritional paper No. 85Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman D (1915) The treatment of cystitis by intravesical injections of lactic bacillus cultures. Lancet 186(4798):330–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)53633-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van de Wijgert JH, Borgdorff H, Verhelst R, Crucitti T, Francis S, Verstraelen H, Jespers V (2014) The vaginal microbiota: what have we learned after a decade of molecular characterization? PLoS One 9(8):e105998.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova N (2016) The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 29(2):223–238.  https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00075-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daliri EBM, Lee BH (2015) New perspectives on probiotics in health and disease. Food Sci Human Wellness 4(2):56–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Donders GG, Zodzika J, Rezeberga D (2014) Treatment of bacterial vaginosis: what we have and what we miss. Expert Opin Pharmacother 15(5):645–657.  https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2014.881800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petrina MAB, Cosentino LA, Rabe LK, Hillier SL (2017) Susceptibility of bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria to secnidazole compared to metronidazole, tinidazole and clindamycin. Anaerobe 47:115–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vasquez A, Ahrne S, Jeppsson B, Molin G (2005) Oral administration of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains of intestinal and vaginal origin to healthy human females: re-isolation from faeces and vagina. Microb Ecol Health Dis 17(1):15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08910600510031376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guiraud JP (2003) Microbiologie alimentaire. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kos B, Šušković J, Vuković S, Šimpraga M, Frece J, Matošić S (2003) Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J Appl Microbiol 94(6):981–987.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01915.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9(1):29–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1980.tb05599.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Toole G, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30(2):295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ait Ouali F, Al Kassaa I, Cudennec B, Abdallah M, Bendali F, Sadoun D, Chihib NE, Drider D (2014) Identification of lactobacilli with inhibitory effect on biofilm formation by pathogenic bacteria on stainless steel surfaces. Int J Food Microbiol 191:116–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (CFA-SFM). Recommandations 2015. Paris, France. Société Française de MicrobiologieGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bendali F, Durand A, Hébraud M, Sadoun D (2011) Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei: an Algerian isolate with antibacterial activity against enteric pathogens and probiotic fitness. J Food Nutr Res 50:139–149Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M (2000) A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods 40(2):175–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nunn KL, Forney LJ (2016) Unraveling the dynamics of the human vaginal microbiome. Yale J Biol Med 89(3):331–337Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaewnopparat S, Dangmanee N, Kaewnopparat N, Srichana T, Chulasiri M, Settharaksa S (2013) In vitro probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum SK5 isolated from vagina of a healthy woman. Anaerobe 22:6–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sabia C, Anacarso I, Bergonzini A, Gargiulo R, Sarti M, Condò C, Messi P, de Niederhausern S, Iseppi R, Bondi M (2014) Detection and partial characterization of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Lactobacillus fermentum CS57 isolated from human vaginal secretions. Anaerobe 26:41–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baldwin EA, Walther-Antonio M, MacLean AM, Gohl DM, Beckman KB, Chen J, White B, Creedon DJ, Chia N (2015) Persistent microbial dysbiosis in preterm premature rupture of membranes from onset until delivery. Peer J 3:e1398.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park TC, Lee HJ (2013) Pregnancy coexisting with uterus didelphys with a blind hemivagina complicated by pyocolpos due to Pediococcus infection: a case report and review of the published reports. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(7):1276–1279.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Borges S, Barbosa J, Silva J, Teixeira P (2013) Evaluation of characteristics of Pediococcus spp. to be used as a vaginal probiotics. J Appl Microbiol 115(2):527–538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Borges S, Costa P, Silva J, Teixeira P (2013) Effects of processing and storage on Pediococcus pentosaceus SB83 in vaginal formulations: lyophilized powder and tablets. Biomed Res Int 680767Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borges S, Teixeira P (2014) Pediococcus pentosaceus SB83 as a potential probiotic incorporated in a liquid system for vaginal delivery. Benefic Microbes 5(4):421–426.  https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2013.0084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vicariotto F, Mogna L, Del Piano M (2014) Effectiveness of the two microorganisms Lactobacillus fermentum LF15 and Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, formulated in slow-release vaginal tablets, in women affected by bacterial vaginosis: a pilot study. J Clin Gastroenterol 48:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin R, Soberon N, Vaneechoutte M, Florez A, Vazquez F, Suarez J (2008) Characterizaton of indigenous vaginal lactobacilli from healthy women as probiotic candidates. Int Microbiol 11(4):261–266.  https://doi.org/10.2436/20.1501.01.70 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Strus M, Kucharska A, Kukla G, Wloch M, Maresz K, Heczko P (2005) The in vitro activity of vaginal Lactobacillus with probiotic properties against Candida. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 13(2):69–75.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10647440400028136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hardy L, Cerca N, Jespers V, Vaneechoutte M, Crucitti T (2017) Bacterial biofilms in the vagina. Res Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2017.02.001
  40. 40.
    Leccese Terraf MC, Juarez Tomás MS, Rault L, Le Loir Y, Even S, Nader-Macías ME (2017) In vitro effect of vaginal lactobacilli on the growth and adhesion abilities of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 199(5):767–774.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1336-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deidda F, Amoruso A, Nicola S, Graziano T, Pane M, Allesina S, Raiteri E, Del Piano M, Mogna L (2016) The in vitro effectiveness of Lactobacillus fermentum against different Candida species compared with broadly used azoles. J Clin Gastroenterol 50:S171–S174.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gibbs RS (1987) Microbiology of the female genital tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156(2):491–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(87)90318-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Akhi MT, Esmailkhani A, Sadeghi J, Niknafs B, Farzadi L, Akhi A, Nasab EN (2017) The frequency of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from endocervix of infertile women in northwest Iran. Int J Fertil Steril 11(1):28–32Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rabia A, Chah N (2011) Antibiotic resistance of probiotics organisms and safety of probiotic dairy products. Int Food Res J 18:837–853Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Delgado S, Flórez AB, Mayo B (2005) Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species from the human gastrointestinal tract. Curr Microbiol 50(4):202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-004-4431-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee YK (2014) What could probiotic do for us? Food Sci Human Wellness 3(2):47–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2014.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Flourié B, Nancey S (2007) Propriétés fonctionnelles des probiotiques. Cahier de Nutrition Diététique 42:38–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-9960(07)91320-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reid G, Bruce AW, Fraser N, Heinemann C, Owen J, Henning B (2001) Oral probiotics can resolve urogenital infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 30(1):49–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2001.tb01549.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liza Ouarabi
    • 1
  • Yasmina Ait Chait
    • 1
  • Hamza Ait Seddik
    • 1
    • 2
  • Djamel Drider
    • 2
  • Farida Bendali
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Microbiologie Appliquée, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la VieUniversité de BejaiaBejaiaAlgeria
  2. 2.Université de Lille, INRA, ISA, Univ. Artois, Univ. Littoral Côte d’OpaleEA 7394–ICV-Institut Charles ViolletteLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations