Advertisement

Characterization of Frequency and Aggregation of the Antarctic Krill (Euphausia superba) Using Acoustics

  • Seok-Gwan Choi
  • Eun-A Yoon
  • Doo-Hae An
  • Sangdeuk Chung
  • Jaebong Lee
  • Kyounghoon Lee
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the dB difference and characteristics of krill swarms inhabiting Subarea 48.1, which includes the west and south of the South Shetland Island and the Elephant Island peripheries, were estimated to distinguish Antarctic krill, using acoustics. From April 13 to 24, 2016, acoustic data were collected along 24 survey lines using the frequencies 38 and 120 kHz, and middle trawling was performed at 7 stations. Using the difference between the dB values of two volume backscattering strength (Sv) frequencies (38 and 120 kHz), a clear acoustic distinction could be made between Antarctic krill (4.9 to 12.0 dB) and fish (−4.0 to −0.2 dB). The distributions and mean Sv of krill swarms in the Elephant Island peripheries and south of South Shetland Island were higher than those in the west of South Shetland Island. The mean length/ height ratio of krill swarms in the west of the South Shetland Island (64.5) was higher than that in the south (35.9) and the Elephant Island peripheries (33.8), with the length of the aggregations exceeding their height. Most krill swarms were distributed between the surface layer (less than 10 m below sea level) and within 200 m of water depth. These results are expected to serve as baseline data for evaluating krill density and biomass by distinguishing them from fish, using acoustics.

Keywords

Antarctic krill dB difference swarm characteristics South Shetland Island acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson A, Siegel V, Pakhomov EA, Jessopp MJ, Loeb V (2009) A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 56:727–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brierley AS, Cox MJ (2010) Shapes of krill swarms and fish schools emerge as aggregation members avoid predators and access oxygen. Curr Biol 20:1758–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brierley AS, Ward P, Watkins JL, Goss C (1998) Acoustic discrimination of Southern Ocean zooplankton. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 45:1155–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coetzee J (2000) Use of a shoal analysis and patch estimation system (SHAPES) to characterise sardine schools. Aquat Living Resour 13:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox MJ, Warren JD, Demer DA, Cutter GR, Brierley AS (2010) Three-dimensional observations of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) swarms made using a multi-beam echosounder. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 57:508–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox MJ, Watkins JL, Reid K, Brierley AS (2011) Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of aggregations of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) around South Georgia 1997–1999. ICES J Mar Sci 68:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Robertis A, Higginbottom I (2007) A post-processing technique to estimate the signal-to noise ratio and remove echosounder background noise. ICES J Mar Sci 64:1282–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Everson I (2000) Distribution and standing stock: the Southern Ocean. In: Everson I (ed) Krill biology, ecology and fisheries. Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp 63–79Google Scholar
  9. Fielding S, Cossio A, Cox M, Reiss C, Skaret G, Demer D, Watkins J, Zhao X (2016) A condensed history and document of the method used by CCAMLR to estimate krill biomass (B0) in 2010. CCAMLR, WG-EMM16/38Google Scholar
  10. Fielding S, Watkin, JL, Trathan PN, Enderlein P, Waluda CM, Stowasser G, Tarling GA, Murphy EJ (2014) Interannual variability in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) density at South Georgia, Southern Ocean: 1997–2013. ICES J Mar Sci 71:2578–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fielding S, Watkinsa JL, Collinsa MA, Enderlein P, Venables HJ (2012) Acoustic determination of the distribution of fish and krill across the Scotia Sea in spring 2006, summer 2008 and autumn 2009. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 59:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fielding S, Watkins J, Cossio A, Reiss C, Watters G, Calise L, Skaret G, Takao Y, Zhao X, Agnew D, Ramm D, Reid K (2011) The ASAM 2010 assessment of krill biomass for area 48 from the Scotia Sea. CCAMLR 2000 synoptic survey. CCAMLR, WG-EMM 11:20Google Scholar
  13. Foote KG (1987) Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, 144 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Haralabous J, Georgakarakos S (1996) Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools. ICES J Mar Sci 53:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewitt R, Demer DA (1993) Dispersion and abundance of Antarctic krill in the vicinity of Elephant Island in the 1992 austral summer. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 99:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ichii T, Katayama K, Obitsu N, Ishii H, Naganobu M (1998) Occurrence of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) concentrations in the vicinity of the South Shetland Islands: relationship to environmental parameters. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 45:1235–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarvis T, Kelly N, Kawaguchi S, Wijk E, Nicol S (2010) Acoustic characterisation of the broad-scale distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) off East Antarctica (30–80 E) in January–March 2006. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 57:916–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang DH, Hwang DJ, Kim SA (1999) Biomass and distribution of Antartic Krill, Euphausia superba, in the Northern part of the South Shetland Island, Antartic Ocean. J Korean Fish Soc 32:737–747Google Scholar
  19. Kang MH, Furusawa M, Miyashita K (2002). Effective and accurate use of difference in mean volume backscattering strength to identify fish and plankton. ICES J Mar Sci 59:794–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kang MH, Nakamura T, Hamano A (2011) A methodology for acoustic and geospatial analysis of diverse artificial-reef datasets. ICES J Mar Sci 68:2210–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang MH, Yoon GD, Choi YM, Kim JK (1996) Hydroacoustic investigations on the distribution characteristics of the anchovy at the south Region of East Sea. J Kor Soc Fish Tech 32:16–23Google Scholar
  22. Korneliussen RJ, Ona E (2002) An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES J Mar Sci 59:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawson GL, Barange M, Freon P (2001) Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information. ICES J Mar Sci 58:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawson GL, Wiebe PH, Stanton TK, Ashjian CJ (2008) Euphausiid distribution along the western Antarctic Peninsula. A. Development of robust multi-frequency acoustic techniques to identify euphausiid aggregations and quantify euphausiid size, abundance, and biomass. Deep Sea Res Pt II 55:412–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu HJ, Lee KT (1995) Species identification of fish shoals from echograms by an echo-signal image processing system. Fish Res 24:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madureira LSP, Ward P, Atkinson A (1993) Differences in backscattering strength determined at 120 and 38 kHz for 3 Species of Antarctic Macroplankton. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 93:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKelvey DR, Wilson CD (2006) Discriminant classification of fish and zooplankton backscattering at 38 and 120 kHz. T Am Fish Soc 135:488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murase H, Ichihara M, Yasuma H, Watanabe H, Yonezaki S, Nagashima H, Miyashita K (2009) Acoustic characterization of biological backscatterings in the Kuroshio-Oyashio interfrontal zone and subarctic waters of the western North Pacific in spring. Fish Oceanogr 18:386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller DGM, Hampton I (1989) Krill aggregation characteristics: spatial-distribution patterns from hydroacoustic observations. Polar Biol 10:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miyashita K, Aoki I, Seno K, Taki K, Ogishima T (1997) Acoustic identification of Isada krill, Euphausia pacifica Hansen, off the Sanriku coast, north-eastern Japan. Fish Oceanogr 6:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petitgas P, Massé J, Beillois P, Lebarbier E, Le Cann A (2003) Sampling variance of species identification in fisheries acoustic surveys based on automated procedures associating acoustic images and trawl hauls. ICES J Mar Sci 60:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid D, Scalabrin C, Petitgas P, Masse J, Aukland R, Carrera P, Georgakarakos S (2000) Standard protocols for the analysis of school based data from echo sounder surveys. Fish Res 47:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards LJ, Kieser R, Mulligan TJ, Candy JR (1991) Classification of fish assemblages based on echo integration surveys. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1264–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose GA, Leggett WC (1988) Hydroacoustic signal classification of fish schools by species. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Safruddin YK, Kawauchi Y, Ito Y, Minami K, Itaya K, Maeda K, Matsukura R, Abe K, Yasuma H, Miyashita K (2013) Tilt angle and theoretical target strength of the Japanese sandeel, Ammodytes personatus, captured on the Northern Coast of Hokkaido. J Mar Acoust Soc Jpn 40:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simmonds EJ, Armstrong F, Copland PJ (1996) Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis. ICES J Mar Sci 53:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang X, Zhao X, Zhang J (2015) A noise removal algorithm for acoustic data with strong interference based on post-processing techniques. CCAMLR, SG-ASAM 15/02:11Google Scholar
  38. Watkins JL, Brierley AS (2002) Verification of acoustic techniques used to identify and size Antarctic krill. ICES J Mar Sci 59:1326–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wiebe PH, Chu D, Kaartvedt S, Hundt A, Melle W, Ona E, Batta-Lona P (2009) The acoustic properties of Salpa thompsoni. ICES J Mar Sci 67:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (KIOST) and the Korean Society of Oceanography (KSO) and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seok-Gwan Choi
    • 1
  • Eun-A Yoon
    • 2
  • Doo-Hae An
    • 1
  • Sangdeuk Chung
    • 1
  • Jaebong Lee
    • 1
  • Kyounghoon Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research DivisionNational Institute of Fisheries ScienceBusanKorea
  2. 2.School of Marine TechnologyChonnam National UniversityYeosuKorea

Personalised recommendations