Advertisement

Application of a Conceptual Ecological Model to Predict the Effects of Sand Mining around Chilsan Island Group in the West Coast of Korea

  • Jae-Won Yoo
  • Chan-Woo Lee
  • Yong-Woo Lee
  • Chang-Soo Kim
  • Chang-Gun Lee
  • Keun-Hyung Choi
  • Seung Won Jung
  • Sung-Joo Jin
  • Kyu-Hee Son
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Chilsan Island Group, located on the west coast of South Korea, has been recognized as a critical breeding and nursery ground for endangered seabirds because food is abundant and human activity is low. Chilsan Island Group has been under protection as a Natural Monument (Article no. 389) since 1997, but attempts were made in 2004 to exploit the coastal sands around the islands. A conceptual ecological model (CEM) was employed with energy flow diagram (EFD) to predict the effects of sand mining on the islands’ ecosystem. The results showed that sand mining activities caused long-term damage to benthic ecosystems and threatened seabird communities by reducing fish populations throughout the food web. The changes in energy flow in the ecosystem due to sand mining operations predict that reduction in secondary production of benthic animal communities might reduce energy transfer to humans and seabirds by 30%. Different ranges of uncertainty provided by the Monte Carlo simulation lead to the conclusion that sand mining could bring about undesirable consequences. One concern is that such negative consequences would have a much more severe impact on seabirds than humans because seabirds cannot compete effectively against humans for the limited food sources. In this study, the complex interrelationships between ecosystem members were simplified and a CEM was established to clearly identify which elements would be affected. The CEM with EFD was found to be helpful in promoting communication between stakeholders, and it is expected to be widely used as a decisionmaking tool by public officials.

Keywords

conceptual ecological model sand mining energy flow macrobenthos production seabirds 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An SM, Lee JH, Woo HJ, Koo BJ, Lee HG, Yoo JW, Je JG (2006) Benthic environmental and macrofaunal community changes during the dyke construction in Saemangeum subtidal area, Korea. Ocean Polar Res 28:369–383 (in Korean)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird D, Evans PR, Milne H, Pienkowski MW (1985) Utilization by shorebirds of benthic invertebrate production in intertidal areas. Oceanogr Mar Biol 23:573–597Google Scholar
  3. Barter MA (2002) Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: importance, threats and conservation status. Wetlands International Global Series 9, International Wader Studies 12, Wetlands International, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. BirdLife (2008) Fisheries are targeting smaller fish with serious implications for seabirds. BirdLife Data Zone, BirdLife International. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/sowb/casestudy/168 Accessed 7 Aug 2015Google Scholar
  5. Brey T (2001) Population dynamics in benthic invertebrates. A virtual handbook. Version 01.2. http://www.thomas-brey.de/science/virtualhandbook Acessed 11 Jul 2017Google Scholar
  6. Cattrijsse A, Codling I, Conides A, Duhamel S, Gibson RN, Hostens K, Mathieson S, McLusky DS (2002) Estuarine development/ habitat restoration and re-creation and their rolein estuarine management for the benefit of aquatic resources. In: Elliott M, Hemingway KL (eds) Fishes in estuaries. Blackwell Science Ltd, London, pp 266–321. doi:10.1002/9780470995228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CHA (1997) Designation report of national cultural heritage - natural monuments and scenic sites. Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea, 135 pGoogle Scholar
  8. CHA (2001) Survey report on the natural monument bird breeding sites and management plan. Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea, 203 pGoogle Scholar
  9. CHA (2017) Natural monument 389. Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea. http://www.cha.go.kr/chaen/search/selectGeneral SearchDetail.do?sCcebKdcd=16&ccebAsno=03890000&sC cebCtcd=36 Accessed 11 Jul 2017Google Scholar
  10. Chow-Fraser P (1998) A conceptual ecological model to aid restoration of Cootes Paradise Marsh, a degraded coastal wetland of Lake Ontario, Canada. Wetl Ecol Manag 6:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung C-S, Yang D-B (1991) On the primary productivity in the southern sea of Korea. J Oceanol Soc Korea 26:242–254Google Scholar
  12. Clapp RA (1998) The resource cycle in forestry and fishing. Can Geogr 42:129–144. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.1998. tb01560.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark RB (2001) Marine pollution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 248 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Cramp S, Simmons KEL, Brooks DC, Collar NJ, Dunn E, Gillmor R, Hollom PAD, Hudson R, Nicholson EM, Ogilvie MA, Olney PJS, Roselaar CS, Voous KH, Wallace DIM, Wattel J, Wilson MG (1983) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Palearctic volume 3: waders to gulls. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 913 pGoogle Scholar
  15. C-CORE (1996) Proposed mining technologies and mitigation techniques: a detailed analysis with respect to the mining of specific offshore mineral commodities. Contract Report for U.S. Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service, C-CORE Publication 96-C15Google Scholar
  16. Daskalov GM, Grishin AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V (2007) Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10518–10523. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701100104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Groot S (1979) The potential environmental impact of marine gravel extraction in the North Sea. Ocean Manage 5:233–249. doi:10.1016/0302-184x(79)90003-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Pimm SL, Wheye D (1994) The birdwatcher’s handbook: a guide to the natural history of the birds of Britain and Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 704 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Furness R, Cooper J (1982) Interactions between breeding seabird and pelagic fish populations in the southern Benguela region. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 8:243–250. doi:10.3354/meps008243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorke M, Brandl R (1986) How to live in colonies: spatial foraging strategies of the black-headed gull. Oecologia 70:288–290. doi:10.1007/bf00379253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gubbay S (2003) Marine aggregate extraction and biodiversity: information, issues and gaps in understanding. Report to the Joint Marine Programme of the Wildlife Trusts and WWF-UK, 20 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Heip C, Hummel H, van Avesaath P, Appeltans W, Arvanitidis C, Aspden R, Austen M, Boero F, Bouma TJ, Boxshall G, Buchholz F, Crowe T, Delaney A, Deprez T, Emblow C, Feral JP, Gasol JM, Gooday A, Harder J, Ianora A, Kraberg A, Mackenzie B, Ojaveer H, Paterson D, Rumohr H, Schiedek D, Sokolowski A, Somerfield P, Sousa Pinto I, Vincx M, Węsławski JM, Nash R (2009) Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Printbase, Dublin, 91 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang SW, Lee HG, Choi KH, Kim CK, Lee TW (2014) Impact of sand extraction on fish assemblages in Gyeonggi Bay, Korea. J Coastal Res 298:1251–1259. doi:10.2112/jcoastresd-12-00145.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ICES (2001) Report of the ICES Working Group on the effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine ecosystem. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 247, 80 pGoogle Scholar
  25. ICES (2003) Report of the ICES Working Group on the effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine ecosystem. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, ICES CM 2003/E:07Google Scholar
  26. Jin X, Tang Q (1996) Changes in fish species diversity and dominant species composition in the Yellow Sea. Fish Res 26:337–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang YS, Choi JK, Chung KH, Park YC (1992) Primary productivity and assimilation number in the Kyonggi Bay and the mideastern coast of Yellow Sea. J Oceanol Soc Korea 27:237–246 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  28. Kenny AJ, Rees HL, Greening J, Campbell S (1998) The effects of gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at an experimental dredging site off North Norfolk, UK (Results 3 years postdredging). ICES CM 1998/V:14, 14 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuipers B, Wilde PD, Creutzberg F (1981) Energy flow in a tidal flat ecosystem. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 5:215–221. doi:10.3354/ meps005215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwon YS, Yoo JC (1997) Some aspects of laying incubation and hatching in the black-tailed gull, Larus crassirostris. Korean J Ornithol 4:1–5 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  31. Kwon YS, Yoo JC (2007) Growth rates of black-tailed gull (Larus crassirostris) chicks in Hongdo Island. Korean J Ornithol 14:39–44 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  32. K-Water (2016) Marine environmental impact assessment of the EEZ sand mining zone in South Sea of Korea. Korea Water Resources Corporation, 1600 p (in Korean)Google Scholar
  33. Lalli CM, Parsons TR (1997) Biological oceanography: an introduction-second edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 320 pGoogle Scholar
  34. Levinton JS (1995) Marine biology: function, biodiversity, ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, 420 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Libralato S, Coll M, Tudela S, Palomera I, Pranovi F (2008) Novel index for quantification of ecosystem effects of fishing as removal of secondary production. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 355: 107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Link JS (2010) Ecosystem-based fisheries management: confronting tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 224 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mann KH (1982) Ecology of coastal waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 322 pGoogle Scholar
  38. McKay SK, Pruitt BA, Anderson CJ, Curran J, Arco Ochoa AD, Freeman MC, Rashleigh B, Trawick ED (2011) Constructing a conceptual model linking drivers and ecosystem services in Piedmont streams. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Georgia Water Resources Conference, University of Georgia, 11–13 April 2011Google Scholar
  39. Mendonça VM, Raffaelli DG, Boyle PR (2007) Interactions between shorebirds and benthic invertebrates at Culbin Sands lagoon, NE Scotland: effects of avian predation on their prey community density and structure. Sci Mar 71:579–591. doi:10.3989/scimar.2007.71n3579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mistri M, Rossi R, Fano EA (2001) Structure and secondary production of a soft bottom macrobenthic community in a brackish lagoon (Sacca di Goro, north-eastern Italy). Estuar Coast Shelf S 52:605–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MLTM (2009a) Final report on the environmental friendly management plan of sand mining (V). Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime affairs of Korea, No. 11–1611000–000402–10, 824 p (in Korean)Google Scholar
  42. MLTM (2009b) National investigation of marine ecosystemsouthern part of the west coast (35.5°N Younggwang-34.5°N Jindo). Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime affairs of Korea, No. 11–1611000–00444–10, 692 p (in Korean)Google Scholar
  43. MOMAF (2000) Environmental impact assessment (EIA) report for the proposed construction of fishing port facilities in Gusipo Port, Gochan-gun, North Jeolla Province. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of Korea, 601 p (in Korean)Google Scholar
  44. MOMAF (2003) Candidate area survey for the East, West coasts and Jeju Island marine ranching program. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of Korea, unpublished datasetGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakamura Y (2013) Beneficial reuse of dredged material-a Japanese perspective. PIANC AS Sustainable Ports Workshop, Syndey, 9–10 September 2013. http://pianc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/12/6.-A-Japanese-Perspective-Nakamura.pdf Accessed 12 July 2017Google Scholar
  46. Newell RC, Seiderer LJ, Hitchcock DR (1998) The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceanogr Mar Biol 36:127–178Google Scholar
  47. Quammen ML (1984) Predation by shorebirds, fish and crabs on invertebrates in intertidal mudflats: an experimental test. Ecology 65:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reynolds RT, Graham RT, Boyce DA (2006) An ecosystem-based conservation strategy for the northern goshawk. Stud Avian Biol 31:299–311Google Scholar
  49. Shim JH (2003) Plankton ecology. Seoul Nationall University Press, Seoul, 382 pGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith CJ, Papadopoulou KN, Barnard S, Mazik K, Elliott M, Patrício J, Solaun O, Little S, Bhatia N, Borja A (2016) Managing the marine environment, conceptual models and assessment considerations for the european marine strategy framework directive. Front Mar Sci 3:1–19. doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00144Google Scholar
  51. Steele JH (1975) The structure of marine ecosystems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 128 pGoogle Scholar
  52. Takahashi T, Nakata H, Hirano K, Matsuoka K, Iwataki M, Yamaguchi H, Kasuya T (2009) Upwelling of oxygen-depleted water (Sumishio) in Omura Bay, Japan. J Oceanogr 65:113–120. doi:10.1007/s10872-009-0011-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tang Q (1989) Changes in the biomass of the Yellow Sea ecosystem. In: Sherman K, Alexander LM (eds) Biomass yields and geography of large marine ecosystems. AAAS Selected Symposium 111, Westview Press, Boulder, pp 7–35Google Scholar
  54. Tang Q, Guo X, Sun Y, Zhang B (2007) Ecological conversion efficiency and its influencers in twelve species of fish in the Yellow Sea Ecosystem. J Marine Syst 67:282–291. doi:10.1016/ j.jmarsys.2006.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tian JH, Wang JH, Liu ZC, Li HC, Wang XZ, Xie DY, Tian YK, Liu FC, Yu XJ (2010) A conceptual ecological model of Cangzhou coastal wetlands, Hebei Province, China. Procedia Environ Sci 2:1002–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uścinowicz S, Jegliński W, Miotk-Szpiganowicz G, Nowak J, Pączek U, Przezdziecki P, Szefler K, Poręba, G (2014) Impact of sand extraction from the bottom of the southern Baltic Sea on the relief and sediments of the seabed. Oceanologia 56:857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uusitalo L, Lehikoinen A, Helle I, Myrberg K (2015) An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environ Modell Softw 63:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Dalfsen JA, Essink K (1997) RAICON: risk analysis of coastal nourishment techniques in the Netherlands. Senck Marit 29:51–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Dalfsen JA, Essink K (2001) Benthic community response to sand dredging and shoreface nourishment in Dutch coastal waters. Senck Marit 31:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Dalfsen JA, Essink K, Toxvig Madsen H, Birklund J, Romero J, Manzanera M (2000) Differential response of macrozoobenthos to marine sand extraction in the North Sea and the Western Mediterranean. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1439–1445. doi:10.1006/ jmsc.2000.0919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiens JA, Scott JM (1975) Model estimation of energy flow in Oregon coastal seabird populations. Condor 77:439–452. doi:10.2307/1366091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson JG, Parkes A (1998) Network analysis of the energy flow through the Dublin Bay ecosystem. Biol Environ 98B:179–190Google Scholar
  63. Yoo S, Shin K (1995) Primary productivity properties in the nearshore region of Taean Peninsula. Ocean Res 17:91–99 (in Korean)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yoon MB (2004) The diversity of reproductive and foraging behaviors on breeding season of Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus). J Ecol Environ 27:383–390 (in Korean)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (KIOST) and the Korean Society of Oceanography (KSO) and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae-Won Yoo
    • 1
  • Chan-Woo Lee
    • 2
  • Yong-Woo Lee
    • 3
  • Chang-Soo Kim
    • 1
  • Chang-Gun Lee
    • 1
  • Keun-Hyung Choi
    • 4
  • Seung Won Jung
    • 5
  • Sung-Joo Jin
    • 6
  • Kyu-Hee Son
    • 7
  1. 1.Korea Institute of Coastal Ecology Inc.BucheonKorea
  2. 2.Gyeongsangnamdo Ramsar Environmental FoundationChangnyeongKorea
  3. 3.Office of Science & Technology, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSilver SpringUSA
  4. 4.Department of Oceanography and Ocean Environmental Sciences, College of Natural SciencesChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  5. 5.Library of Marine SamplesSouth Sea Research Institute, KIOSTGeojeKorea
  6. 6.Department of Environmental Engineering, College of EngineeringKwangwoon UniversitySeoulKorea
  7. 7.Aggregate Resources Management TeamKorea Marine Environment Management CorporationSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations