Advertisement

Life history and life table parameters of Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae) on two European grape cultivars

  • Liana JohannEmail author
  • Joseane Moreira do Nascimento
  • Guilherme Liberato da Silva
  • Gervásio Silva Carvalho
  • Noeli Juarez Ferla
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The development of Panonychus ulmi feeding on apple leaves has been widely studied, but nothing is known about its development on grapevine leaves. This study aimed to gather biological information on P. ulmi based on its life table on leaves of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Pinot Noir (PN) grapevine cultivars, and check the oviposition rate of populations on apple and grapevines. The development of P. ulmi started with 30 eggs on CS and 30 eggs on PN, and oviposition tests were performed with four combinations (C1: ♂ Apple X ♀ Apple; C2: ♂ Grapevine X ♀ Grapevine; C3: ♀ Apple Isolated; and C4: ♀ Grapevine Isolated). This study was carried out at 25 ± 3 °C temperature, 14 h of photoperiod, and 70 ± 5% relative humidity. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the grapevine cultivars studied, except for larval and egg-adult period of females and males. A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was observed for preoviposition and adult longevity. Life table parameters on CS were R0 = 7.88, T = 17.78 days, TD = 5.97 days, rm = 0.12, λ = 1.12; and on PN they were R0 = 5.20, T = 16.45 days, TD = 6.91 days, rm = 0.10, and λ = 1.11. Females of cross C1 laid an average of 3.44 ± 1.6 eggs daily, in C2 they laid 2.70 ± 1.76 eggs, in C3 they laid 4.19 ± 1.88 eggs, and females of C4 laid 3.6 ± 1.19 eggs. Data in our study allowed us to conclude that the development of P. ulmi is similar on the two grapevine cultivars studied. However, when its performance is compared to apples, reproductive potential on vineyards is lower.

Keywords

European red mite Grapevine Cabernet sauvignon Pinot noir Apple 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Vinícola Miolo Ltda, Cooperativa Vinícola Garibaldi, and Univates for their financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.

References

  1. Alberti, G. (2005). On some fundamental characteristics in acarine morphology. Atti della Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia, 53, 315–360.Google Scholar
  2. Amaro, P. (2001). A protecção integrada da vinha na região Norte. Projecto Pamaf 6077. Lisboa: ISA/Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, M., Ayres Júnior, M., Ayres, D. L., & Santos, A. A. (2007). Bioestat – Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biomédicas. Belém: Ong Mamiraua.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, E. W., & Tuttle, D. M. (1994). A guide to the spider mites (Tetranychidae) of the United States. House West Bloomfield: Indira Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Blair, C. A., & Groves, J. R. (1950). Biology of the fruit tree red spider mite, Metatetranychus ulmi Koch in Southeast England. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 27, 14–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolland, H., Gutierrez, J., & Flechtmann, C. H. W. (1998). World catalogue of the spider mite family (Acari: Tetranychidae). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  7. Botha, J., & Learmonth, S. (2005). Management of European red mite in western Australia. Department of Agriculture, Government of Western Australia. Farmnote No. 40.Google Scholar
  8. Crooker, A. (1985). Spider mites: Their biology, natural enemies and control (pp. 149–163). Amsterdan: Elsevier. Embryonic and juvenile development.Google Scholar
  9. Ferla, N. J., & Botton, M. (2008). Ocorrência do ácaro vermelho europeu associado à cultura da videira no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Ciência Rural, 38, 1758–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gotoh, T., Ishikawa, Y., & Kitashima, Y. (2003). Life-history traits of the six Panonychus species from Japan (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology, 29, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herbert, H. J. (1981). Biology, life tables, and intrinsic rate of increase of the european red mite, Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Canadian Entomologist, 113, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johann, L., Klock, C. L., Ferla, N. J., & Botton, M. (2009). Acarofauna (Acari) associada à videira (Vitis vinifera L.) no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Biociencias, 17(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Maia, A. H. N., Luiz, A. J. B., & Campanhola, C. (2000). Statistical inference on associated fertility life table parameters using jackknife technique: computational aspects. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Migeon, A, & Dorkeld, F. (2006-2017). Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb.
  15. Monteiro, L. (2002). Manejo integrado de pragas em macieira no Rio Grande do Sul II. Uso de Neoseiulus californicus para o controle de Panonychus ulmi. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 24(23), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Navia, D., Flechtmann, C. H. W., & Moraes, G. J. (1998). Avaliação do risco de introdução de ácaros fitófagos associados à cultura da uva no Brasil. Brasília: Documentos 32, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia.Google Scholar
  17. Newcomer, E. J., & Yothers, M. A. (1929). Biology of the european red mite in the pacific northwest. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Technical bulletin.Google Scholar
  18. Papp, J., Jenser, G., & Haltrich, A. (2001). Effect of nitrogen supply on the population of European red spider mite and green apple aphid in an IPM apple orchard. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 564, 407–412.Google Scholar
  19. Parent, B., & Beaulieu, A. A. (1957). Life-history of European red mite. Canadian Entomologist, 89, 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodrigues, J. R. O. (2005). Os ácaros fitoseídeos na limitação natural do aranhiço-vermelho em fruteiras e vinha. Ponte de Lima: Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo/Escola Superior Agrária de Ponte de Lima.Google Scholar
  21. SAS Institute. (2000). SAS/GRAPH 2000 Software: Reference version 8, v.2. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Schruft, G. A. (1985). Spider mites: Their biology, natural enemies and control (pp. 359–366). Amsterdan: Elsevier. Grape.Google Scholar
  23. Skorupska, A. (1998). Morphologic-anatomical structure of leaves and demographic parameters of the hawthorn spider mite, Tetranychus viennensis Zacher and the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acarina: Tetranychidae) on selected scab-resistance apple cultivars. Journal of Applied Entomology, 122, 494–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin, W. D., Qiu, G. S., Yan, W. T., Sun, L. N., Zhang, H. J., Ma, C. S., & Adaobi, U. P. (2013). Age-stage two-sex life tables of Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae), on different apple cultivars. Journal of Economic Entomology, 106(5), 2118–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang, Z. Q. (2003). Mites of greenhouses, identification, biology and control. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Acarologia, TecnovatesUnivatesLajeadoBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemas Ambientais SustentáveisUnivatesLajeadoBrazil
  3. 3.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Faculdade de BiociênciasPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPortoBrazil
  4. 4.Programa de Pós-Graduação em BiotecnologiaUnivatesBrasil AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations