Advertisement

Rare Metals

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Correlation between platinum–aluminide coating features and tensile behavior of nickel-based superalloy Rene®80

  • Mohammad Mehdi Barjesteh
  • Seyed Mehdi AbbasiEmail author
  • Karim Zangeneh Madar
  • Kourosh Shirvani
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of platinum (a rare metal)–aluminide coating parameters on the tensile properties of nickel-based superalloy Rene®80 was evaluated at 871 °C. For this purpose, initial layers of platinum with different thicknesses (2, 4, 6 and 8 μm) were coated on tensile samples. Then, low-temperature high-activity (LTHA) and high-temperature low-activity (HTLA) processes were used for aluminizing. Results of microstructural evaluations using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and phase analysis by X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed a three-layer structure coating for different platinum layer thicknesses and both aluminizing processes. Increasing the thickness of the platinum layer from 2 to 8 μm led to the improvement in the final coating thickness from 91.6 to 102.1 μm in HTLA. This increase was from 128.1 to 148.6 μm in LTHA. The results of hot tensile tests at 871 °C showed a decrease in strength properties of the coated samples compared to the uncoated ones. However, HTLA and high thicknesses of the initial platinum layer showed an intense reduction. The results of fractographic evaluations about uncoated samples showed a ductile fracture. On the other hand, coated samples showed a simultaneous ductile and brittle fracture failure mechanism. But the main fracture morphology was brittle cleavage fracture which was for the HTLA.

Keywords

Rene®80 Platinum–aluminide Aluminizing Tensile properties Fractography 

References

  1. [1]
    Sims CT. A history of superalloy metallurgy for superalloy metallurgists. In: Gell M, editor. Superalloys 1984, Champion (USA), 1st ed. Warrendale, PA: The Metallurgical Society. p. 399.  https://doi.org/10.7449/1984/Superalloys_1984_399_419.
  2. [2]
    Lavella M. Contact properties and wear behaviour of nickel based superalloy René 80. Metals. 2016;159(6):1.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Safari J, Nategh S. On the heat treatment of Rene-80 nickel-base superalloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006;176:240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Barjesteh MM, Abbasi SM, Zangeneh Madar K, Shirvani K. The effect of heat treatment on characteristics of the gamma prime phase and hardness of the nickel-based superalloy Rene80. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019;227:46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Rafiee H, Arabi H, Rastegari S. Effects of temperature and Al-concentration on formation mechanism of an aluminide coating applied on superalloy IN738LC through a single step low activity gas diffusion process. J. Alloys Compd. 2010;505(1):206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zhan Z, Liu Z, Liu J, Li L, Li Z, Pibo L. Microstructure and high-temperature corrosion behaviors of aluminide coatings by low-temperature pack aluminizing process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010;256(12):3874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Streiff R. Protection of materials by advanced high temperature coatings. Primary lecture. J. Phys. IV. 1993;3(9):17.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Shirvani K, Firouzi S, Rashidghamat A. Microstructures and cyclic oxidation behaviour of Pt-free and low-Pt NiAl coatings on the Ni-base superalloy Rene-80. Corros. Sci. 2012;55:378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wei LL, Peng H, Zheng L, Sun JY. Processing and oxidation behavior of Pt-diffused coatings. Rare Met. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-017-0982-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Azarmehr SA, Shirvani K, Schutze M, Galetz M. Microstructural evolution of silicon–platinum modified aluminide coatings on superalloy GTD-111. Surf. Coat Technol. 2017;321:455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rahmani K, Nategh S. Influence of aluminide diffusion coating on the tensile properties of the Ni-base superalloy René 80. Surf. Coat Technol. 2008;202(8):1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Alam MZ, Kamat SV, Jayaram V, Das DK. Tensile behavior of a free-standing Pt–aluminide (PtAl) bond coat. Acta Mater. 2013;61(4):1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Taylor MP, Evans HE, Busso EP, Qian ZQ. Creep properties of a Pt–aluminide coating. Acta Mater. 2006;54(12):3241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Esin VA, Maurel V, Breton P, Koster A, Selezneff S. Increase in ductility of Pt-modified nickel aluminide coating with high temperature ageing. Acta Mater. 2015;105:505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Rashidghamat A, Shirvani K. Electrodeposition of platinum on nickel-base superalloy Rene-80. In: EFC Workshop on Solutions for High Temperature Corrosion Protection in Energy Conversion System. Frankfurt, Germany. 2009. 24.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Yavorska M, Sieniawski J. Effect of diffusion on platinum coatings deposited on the surface of nickel based superalloy by the electroplating process. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010;45(1):56.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Krishna GR, Das DK, Singh V, Joshi SV. Role of Pt content in the microstructural development and oxidation performance of Pt–aluminide coatings produced using a high-activity aluminizing process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 1998;251(1–2):40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Pedrazaa F, Kennedya AD, Kopecekb J, Morettob P. Investigation of the microstructure of platinum-modified aluminide coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006;200(12):4032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Garg SP, Kale GB, Patil RV, Kundu T. Thermodynamic inter-diffusion coefficient in binary systems with intermediate phases. Intermetallics. 1999;7(8):901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kiruthika P, Paul A. A pseudo-binary interdiffusion study in the β-(Ni, Pt)Al phase. Philos. Mag. Lett. 2015;95(3):138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Das DK, Singh V, Joshi SV. Effect of prealuminizing diffusion treatment on microstructural evolution of high-activity Pt–aluminide coatings. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2000;31(8):2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Yuan K. Thermal and mechanical behaviors of high temperature coatings. Linköping: Linköping University; 2013. 9.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Bose S. High Temperature Coatings. 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann; 2007. 123.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kolkman HJ. Creep-fatigue and their interaction in coated and uncoated René 80. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1987;89:81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Alam MZ, Srivathsa B, Kamat SV, Jayaram V, Das DK. Study of Brittle-to-ductile-transition in Pt–aluminide bond coat using micro-tensile testing method. Trans. Indian Inst. Metals. 2011;64(1–2):57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Alam MZ, Kamat SV, Jayaram V, Das DK. Micromechanisms of fracture and strengthening in free-standing Pt–aluminide bond coats under tensile loading. Acta Mater. 2014;67:278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Miracle DB. Physical and mechanical properties of the B2 compound NiAl. Acta. Metall. Mater. 1993;41(3):649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Tamarin Y. Protective Coatings for Turbine Blades. ASM International: Geauga County, Ohio; 2002. 120.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Newby JR. (Volume Coordinator), ASM Handbook, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, vol. 8. Ohio: ASM International; 2000. 37.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Watanabe M, Mumm DR, Chiras S, Evans AG. Measurement of the residual stress in a Pt–aluminide bond coat. Scr. Mater. 2001;46(1):67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Greving DJ, Shadley JR, Rybicki EF. Effects of coating thickness and residual stresses on the bond strength of ASTM C633-79 thermal spray coating test specimens. J. Thermal. Spray Technol. 1994;3(4):371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nonferrous Metals Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
corrected publication September 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallic Materials Research CenterMalek Ashtar University of Technology (MUT)TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Advanced Materials and New EnergiesIranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations