Advertisement

Rare Metals

pp 1–9 | Cite as

Quench sensitivity of Al–Cu–Mg alloy thick plate

  • Yuan Yin
  • Bing-Hui LuoEmail author
  • Zhen-Hai Bai
  • Hui-Bo Jing
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The quench sensitivity of Al–Cu–Mg alloy was investigated at different thicknesses of the thick plate. The quenching process was simulated via finite element analysis (FEA); time–temperature–property (TTP) curves and time–temperature–transformation (TTT) curves were obtained through hardness test and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) test; and the microstructural observation was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Experimental results exhibit that the quench cooling rate decreases dramatically from the surface to the center of the plate, and the inhomogeneous quenching causes the difference in microstructure. With the decrease in quench cooling rate, constituent particles are coarsening gradually; the quantity of T-phase (Al20Cu2Mn3) increases and the S-phase (Al2CuMg) decreases. According to the precipitation kinetics analysis, the decrease in S-phase is caused by the increase in precipitate activation energy. So that the center of the plate shows the highest quenching sensitivity, which is consistent with the analysis of time–temperature–property curves and time–temperature–transformation curves.

Keywords

Al–Cu–Mg alloy Quench sensitivity Precipitation kinetics Time–temperature–property curves Microstructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Defense Supporting Research Program (No. JPPT-125-GJGG-08-01).

References

  1. [1]
    Warner T. Recently-developed aluminum solutions for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Forum. 2006;519–521:1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dursun T, Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminum alloys. Mater Des. 2014;56(4):862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Heinz A, Haszler A, Keidel C, Moldenhauer S, Benedictus R, Miller WS. Recent development in aluminum alloys for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;280(1):102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cavazos JL, Colás R. Quench sensitivity of a heat treatable aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;363(1):171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Evancho JW, Staley JT. Kinetics of precipitation in aluminum alloys during continuous cooling. Metall Mater Trans B. 1974;5(1):43.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Staley JT. Quench factor analysis of aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 1987;3(11):923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Avrami M. Kinetics of phase change. I General theory. J Chem Phys. 1939;7(12):1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wang H, Yi Y, Huang S. Investigation of quench sensitivity of high strength 2219 aluminum alloy by TTP and TTT diagrams. J Alloys Compd. 2017;690:446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tiryakioğlu M, Shuey RT. Quench sensitivity of 2219-T87 aluminum alloy plate. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(18):5033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kang L, Zhou YR, Zhao G, Liu K, Tian N. Prediction of properties distribution of 7B50 alloy thick plates after quenching and aging by quench factor analysis method. Rare Met. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-018-1083-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chen JS, Li XW, Xiong BQ, Zhang YA, Li ZH, Yan HW. Quench sensitivity of novel Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys containing different Cu contents. Rare Met. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-017-0981-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kongthep J, Juijerm P. Kinetics of precipitation hardening phase in aluminum alloy AA 6110. Mater Sci Technol. 2014;30(14):1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Archambault P, Godard D. High temperature precipitation kinetics and TTT curve of a 7xxx alloy by in situ electrical resistivity measurements and differential calorimetry. Scr Mater. 2000;42(7):675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Davydov VG, Ber LB, Kaputkin EY, Komov VI, Ukolova OG, Lukina EA. TTP and TTT diagrams for quench sensitivity and ageing of 1424 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;280(1):76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Zhang L, Feng X, Li Z, Liu C. FEM simulation and experimental study on the quenching residual stress of aluminum alloy 2024. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2013;227(7):954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Le Masson P, Loulou T, Artioukhine E, Rogeon P, Carron D, Quemener JJ. A numerical study for the estimation of a convection heat transfer coefficient during a metallurgical “Jominy end-quench” test. Int J Therm Sci. 2002;41(6):517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kim HK, Oh SI. Evaluation of heat transfer coefficient during heat treatment by inverse analysis. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;112(2):157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dong YB, Shao WZ, Jiang JT, Chao DY, Zhen L. Influence of quenching rate on microstructure and dimensional stability of Al–Cu–Mg–Si alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32(18):1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lv X, Guo E, Li Z, Wang G. Research on microstructure in as-cast 7A55 aluminum alloy and its evolution during homogenization. Rare Met. 2011;30(6):664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wang SC, Starink MJ. Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al–Cu–Mg–(Li) based alloys. Int Mater Rev. 2005;50(4):193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Shen Z, Liu C, Ding Q, Wang S, Wei X, Chen L. The structure determination of Al20Cu2Mn3 by near atomic resolution chemical mapping. J Alloys Compd. 2014;601(9):25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Banerjee S, Robi PS, Srinivasan A. Calorimetric study of precipitation kinetics of Al–Cu–Mg and Al–Cu–Mg-0.06 wt% Sn alloys. Met Mater Int. 2010;16(4):523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Smith GW. Precipitation kinetics in solutionized aluminum alloy 2124: determination by scanning and isothermal calorimetry. Thermochim Acta. 1998;317(1):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Liu JC, Zhang YA, Liu HW, Li XW, Li ZH, Zhu BH. Hardenability of 2124 aluminum alloy based on Jominy end quench test. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2010;20(11):2118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Christian JW. The theory of transformations in metals and alloys. New York: Newnes; 2002. 538.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Rios PR, Villa E. On the generalization of JMAK’s theory. Mater Sci Forum. 2013;753:137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Boswell PG. On the calculation of activation energies using a modified Kissinger method. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1980;18(2):353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;29(11):1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Harlow DG, Nardiello J, Payne J. The effect of constituent particles in aluminum alloys on fatigue damage evolution: statistical observations. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32(3):505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Staab TEM, Haaks M, Modrow H. Early precipitation stages of aluminum alloys-the role of quenched-in vacancies. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;255(1):132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal Publishing Center of University of Science and Technology, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations