Advertisement

Rare Metals

pp 1–8 | Cite as

Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welding joint during post weld heat treatment with different zigzag lines

  • Zhi-Li Hu
  • Qiu PangEmail author
  • Ming-Liang Dai
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Zigzag line is a common defect in friction stir welding (FSW) joint. The formation mechanism of the zigzag line in Al–Cu alloy FSW joint and its influence on the microstructure and mechanical properties during post weld heat treatment (PWHT) were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), microhardness and tensile tests. It is found that the occurrence of zigzag line for PWHT joint is determined by PWHT process which in nature depends on residual stress and thermal stress of FSW joint. The optimization of PWHT process to reduce the residual and thermal stress can trigger for the deterioration of mechanical properties of PWHT joints with zigzag line. No obvious decrease of tensile properties is observed for T6-450 and T6-495 joints although zigzag line appears in the weld. PWHT determines the sizes of zigzag line cracks and consequently determines the fracture location and characteristics of FSW joint.

Keywords

Friction stir welding Post weld heat treatment Zigzag line Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51775397 and 51405358), the China Automobile Industry Innovation and Development Joint Fund (No. U1564202), the Program of the Ministry of Education of China for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B17034) and the Open Fund of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-Walled Structures (No. 2017002).

References

  1. [1]
    Heidarzadeh A, Saeid T. Correlation between process parameters, grain size and hardness of friction-stir-welded Cu–Zn alloys. Rare Met. 2018;37(5):628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Wang XS, Hu ZL, Yuan SJ, Hua L. Influence of tube spinning on formability of friction stir welded aluminum alloy tubes for hydroforming application. Mater Sci Eng, A. 2014;607:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Xu HB, Sun HB, Yang H, Chi LY, Chen J. Microstructure and properties of joint for stirring brazing of dissimilar Al/Mg alloy during heating processes. Rare Met. 2015;34(4):245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Xu HB, Tang S, Xi HF, Gao PY, Li MY. Joint interface during arc milling brazing of aluminum alloy to low carbon steel with cutter milling at various rotation speeds. Rare Met. 2017;36(11):872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hu ZL, Wang XS, Pang Q, Huang F, Qin XP. The effect of post-processing on tensile property and microstructure evolution of friction stir welding aluminum alloy joint. Mater Charact. 2015;99:180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zhang J, Luo GQ, Shen Q, Zhang LM, Huang ZJ. Characterization of diffusion-bonded joint between Al and Mg using a Ni interlayer. Rare Met. 2016;35(7):537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hu ZL, Yuan SJ, Wang XS, Liu G, Liu HJ. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Cu–Mg alloy tube fabricated by friction stir welding and tube spinning. Scripta Mater. 2012;66(7):427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fanelli P, Evangelisti A, Salvini P, Vivio F. Modelling and characterization of structural behaviour of Al open-cell foams. Mater Des. 2017;114:167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nandan R, DebRoy T, Bhadeshia HKDH. Recent advances in friction-stir welding-process, weldment structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2008;53(6):980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liu HJ, Chen YC, Feng JC. Effect of zigzag line on the mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints of an Al–Cu alloy. Scripta Mater. 2006;55:231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Okamura H, Aota K, Sakamoto M, Ezumi M, Ikeuchi K. Behavior of oxide during friction stir welding of aluminum alloy and its influence on mechanical properties. J Jpn Weld Soc. 2001;19(3):446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Sato YS, Yamashita F, Sugiura Y, Park SHC, Kokawa H. FIB-assisted TEM study of an oxide array in the root of a friction stir welded aluminium alloy. Scr Mater. 2004;50:365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Sato YS, Takauchi H, Park SH, Kokawa H. Characteristics of the kissing-bond in friction stir welded Al alloy 1050. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;405:333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Khodir SA, Shibayanagi T. Friction stir welding of dissimilar AA2024 and AA7075 aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng B. 2008;148(1):82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Liu ZL, Cui HT, Ji SD, Xu M, Meng X. Improving joint features and mechanical properties of pinless fiction stir welding of alcald 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy. J Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32(12):1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ren SR, Ma ZY, Chen LQ. Effect of initial butt surface on tensile properties and fracture behavior of friction stir welded Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;479:293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ren SR, Ma ZY, Chen LQ, Zhang Y. Effects of post weld heat treatment and second welding on tensile properties of friction stir welded 7075-T651 aluminum alloy. Acta Metall Sin. 2007;43(3):225.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Cabibbo M, Forcellese A, Simoncini M, Pieralisi M, Ciccarelli D. Effect of welding motion and pre-/post-annealing of friction stir welded AA5754 joints. Mater Des. 2016;93:146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Cui L, Yang X, Zhou G, Xu X, Shen Z. Characteristics of defects and tensile behaviors on friction stir welded AA6061-T4T-joints. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;543:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhang Z, Xiao BL, Ma ZY. Effect of segregation of secondary phase particles and ‘‘S’’ line on tensile fracture behavior of friction stir-welded 2024Al-T351 joints. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013;44(9):4081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Khan NZ, Siddiquee AN, Khan ZA, Shihab SK. Investigations on tunneling and kissing bond defects in FSW joints for dissimilar aluminum alloys. J Alloy Compd. 2015;648:360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Jolu TL, Morgeneyer TF, Denquin A, Gourgues-Lorenzon AF. Fatigue lifetime and tearing resistance of AA2198 Al–Cu–Li alloy friction stir welds: effect of defects. Int J Fatigue. 2015;70:463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kadlec M, Ruzek R, Nováková L. Mechanical behaviour of AA7475 friction stir welds with the kissing bond defect. Int J Fatigue. 2015;74:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Esmaily M, Svensson JE, Johansson LG. Technical note: a major loss in tensile strength of friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints resulting from atmospheric corrosion. Corrosion. 2016;72(12):1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ji SD, Meng XC, Ma L, Gao SS. Effect of groove distribution in shoulder on formation, macrostructures, and mechanical properties of pinless friction stir welding of 6061-O aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2016;87(9–12):3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Safarkhanian MA, Goodarzi M, Boutorabi SMA. Effect of abnormal grain growth on tensile strength of Al–Cu–Mg alloy friction stir welded joints. J Mater Sci. 2009;44(20):5452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Han WT, Wan FR, Li G, Dong CL, Tong JH. Effect of trailing heat sink on residual stresses and welding distortion in friction stir welding Al sheets. Sci Technol Weld Joint. 2011;16(5):453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Hu ZL, Yuan SJ, Wang XS, Liu G, Huang YX. Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the microstructure and plastic deformation behavior of friction stir welded 2024. Mater Des. 2011;32:5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nonferrous Metals Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Automobile ComponentsWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components TechnologyWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringWuhan Donghu UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations