Rare Metals

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 233–237 | Cite as

Grain growth behavior of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy during isothermal β heat treatments

  • De-Lai OuyangEmail author
  • Hai-Ming Du
  • Xia Cui
  • Shi-Qiang Lu
  • Xian-Juan Dong


Isothermal β heat treatments of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy were performed at the temperature of 1040–1240 °C to examine the influence of heating conditions on grain growth of the alloy. The results show that the grain size increases with heating temperature and holding time increasing. Rapid β grain growth of the alloy takes place at the temperature of over 1140 °C. The grain growth kinetics for the alloy follows the classical isothermal grain growth law. The growth time exponent (n) of 0.5651 and activation energy (Q) of 129.6 kJ·mol−1 are determined. Finally, in order to determine the grain size under different heating conditions, the grain growth model of the alloy was established.


Isothermal heating Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy Grain growth Model 



This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51261020), the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (No. 2014ZE56015) and the Educational Committee of Jiangxi Province of China (No. GJJ14505).


  1. [1]
    Zong YY, Shan DB, Xu M, Lv Y. Flow softening and microstructural evolution of TC11 titanium alloy during hot deformation. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(4):1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Yang J, Song ZM, Lei LM, Zhang GP. Detecting mechanical properties of microstructure units in Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;617:84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wang KL, Fu MW, Lu SQ, Li X. Study of the dynamic recrystallization of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy in β-forging process via finite element method modeling and microstructure characterization. Mater Des. 2011;32(3):1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Song ZM, Lei LM, Zhang B, Huang X, Zhang GP. Microstructure dependent fatigue cracking resistance of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2012;28(7):614.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fan RH, Zhu M, Hui SX, Li DF, Shen J. Influence of heat treatment on microstructure and damage tolerance property in Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China. 2007;17(S1):482.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Verdhan N, Bhende DD, Kapoor R, Chakravartty JK. Effect of microstructure on the fatigue crack growth behaviour of a near-α Ti alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2015;74:46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Muzvidziwa M, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Hirano S. Role of microstructure on the fatigue crack propagation behavior of a friction stir welded Ti–6Al–4V. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015;170(2):243.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang J, Cheng X, Li Z. Total fatigue life prediction for Ti-alloys airframe structure based on durability and damage-tolerant design concept. Mater Des. 2010;31(9):4329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Shao H, Zhao Y, Ge P, Zeng W. In-situ SEM observations of tensile deformation of the lamellar microstructure in TC21 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;559:515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Prasad Y, Seshacharyulu T, Medeiros S, Frazier W. Effect of prior β-grain size on the hot deformation behavior of Ti–6Al–4V: coarse vs coarser. J Mater Eng Perform. 2000;9(2):153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wen CE, Yasue K, Lin JG, Zhang YG, Chen CQ. The effect of lamellar spacing on the creep behavior of a fully lamellar TiAl alloy. Intermetallics. 2000;8(5–6):525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Tang J, Huang B, Zhou K, Liu W, He Y, Liu Y. Factors affecting the lamellar spacing in two-phase TiAl alloys with fully lamellar microstructures. Mater Res Bull. 2001;36(9):1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ma YJ, Liu JR. β-Grain growth and influence of its grain size on damage-tolerance property in titanium alloy. Rare Metal Mater Eng. 2009;38(6):976.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    He SL, Lei XJ, Wang XX, Ma YJ, Wang XZ, Wang DC. Relationship between microstructure and damage tolerance of TA15 titanium alloy. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China. 2010;20(z1):43.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Dang W, Xie XY, Li JS, Hu R, Zhu ZS, Zhang FS, Zhou L. Influence of lamellar microstructure feature on fracture toughness of TC21 alloy. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China. 2010;20(z1):16.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Wang T, Guo H, Tan L, Yao Z, Zhao Y, Liu P. Beta grain growth behaviour of TG6 and Ti17 titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(21):6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Semiatin SL, Soper JC, Sukonnik IM. Grain growth in a conventional titanium alloy during rapid, continuous heat treatment. Scripta Metal Mater. 1994;30(7):951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ivasishin OM, Semiatin SL, Markovsky PE, Shevchenko SV, Ulshin SV. Grain growth and texture evolution in Ti-6Al-4V during beta annealing under continuous heating conditions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002;337(1–2):88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Guilemany JM, Gil FJ. Kinetic grain growth in Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloys. J Mater Sci. 1991;26(17):4626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Gil FJ, Picas JA, Manero JM, Forn A, Planell JA. Effect of the addition of palladium on grain growth kinetics of pure titanium. J Alloys Compd. 1997;260(1):147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Gil FX, Rodríguez D, Planell JA. Grain growth kinetics of pure titanium. Scripta Metal Mater. 1995;33(8):1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Gil FJ, Planell JA. Behaviour of normal grain growth kinetics in single phase titanium and titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;283(1–2):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nonferrous Metals Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringNanchang Hangkong UniversityNanchangChina
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Art DesignJiangxi Normal UniversityNanchangChina
  3. 3.School of Aeronautical Manufacturing EngineeringNanchang Hangkong UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations