A comprehensive investigation of the mechanical behavior and the dielectrics of pure polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA with graphene (GnP) in fused deposition modeling (FDM)
In this work, the mechanical response of fused deposition modeling (FDM) specimens made of polylactic acid (PLA) and polylactic acid nanocomposite with graphene (PLA GnP) filler is experimentally determined. A wide variety of standard tests was performed. Test results were assessed to depict quantitatively the mechanical properties of the materials tested. Comprehensive comparison of the mechanical strength between FDM-printed PLA and PLA GnP polymers was carried out to illustrate the filler’s impact. Effect of the FDM process in these materials’ properties arises by comparing them to the ones of the bulk or injection molded specimens, in quantitative and qualitative terms. Comparison demonstrates that both polymers exhibit similar behavior in every case, with slight domination of the PLA to the PLA GnP composite. Test results were correlated with the patterns of the specimens’ fractured surfaces, obtained through scanning electron microscopy. Effect of graphene in the dielectrics of the material is also evaluated, with the measurements showing a significant increase in the dielectric values, with the addition of this specific nanocomposite in the material.
KeywordsNanopolymer composites 3D printing Fused deposition modeling (FDM) Polylactic acid (PLA) PLA with graphene (PLA GnP) Mechanical properties
Authors would like to thank Dr. Mirella Suchea (IMT Bucharest) for the SEM support. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
No funding was received for this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 6.Letcher T, Waytashek M (2014) Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. In: ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November 14–20Google Scholar
- 8.Abbas TF, Othman FM, Ali HB (2018) Influence of layer thickness on impact property of 3D-printed PLA. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 5(2):1–4Google Scholar
- 13.Vian WD, Denton NL (2018) Hardness comparison of polymer specimens produced with different processes. Purdue University Press, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
- 19.Plymill A, Minneci R, Greeley DA, Gritton J, Greeley D (2016) Graphene and carbon nanotube PLA composite feedstock development for fused deposition modeling. University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1955
- 21.Nakatsuka T (2011) Polylactic acid-coated cable. Fujikura Tech Rev 40:39–45Google Scholar
- 29.Huber E, Mirzaee M, Bjorgaard J, Hoyack M, Noghanian S, Chang I (2016) Dielectric property measurement of PLA. 978-1-4673-9985-2/16 2016 IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 30.HaydaleHDPlas® PLA-GNP-A (2017) Technical Data Sheet. http://www.haydale.com/
- 31.ASTM D790-10 Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materialsGoogle Scholar
- 32.Roark RJ (1954) Formulas for stress and strain, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 33.ASTM D6110-04 Standard test method for determining the Charpy impact resistance of notches specimens of plasticsGoogle Scholar
- 34.Tipler P (2004) Physics for scientists and engineers: mechanics, oscillations and waves, thermodynamics, 5th edn. W. H. Freeman, New York. ISBN 0-7167-0809-4Google Scholar
- 35.Plane strain fracture toughness (kic) data handbook for metals army materials and mechanics research center ad-773 673Google Scholar
- 36.Roylance D (2001) Introduction to fracture mechanics, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MITGoogle Scholar