Advertisement

A comprehensive investigation of the mechanical behavior and the dielectrics of pure polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA with graphene (GnP) in fused deposition modeling (FDM)

  • N. Vidakis
  • M. PetousisEmail author
  • K. Savvakis
  • A. Maniadi
  • E. Koudoumas
Research Article

Abstract

In this work, the mechanical response of fused deposition modeling (FDM) specimens made of polylactic acid (PLA) and polylactic acid nanocomposite with graphene (PLA GnP) filler is experimentally determined. A wide variety of standard tests was performed. Test results were assessed to depict quantitatively the mechanical properties of the materials tested. Comprehensive comparison of the mechanical strength between FDM-printed PLA and PLA GnP polymers was carried out to illustrate the filler’s impact. Effect of the FDM process in these materials’ properties arises by comparing them to the ones of the bulk or injection molded specimens, in quantitative and qualitative terms. Comparison demonstrates that both polymers exhibit similar behavior in every case, with slight domination of the PLA to the PLA GnP composite. Test results were correlated with the patterns of the specimens’ fractured surfaces, obtained through scanning electron microscopy. Effect of graphene in the dielectrics of the material is also evaluated, with the measurements showing a significant increase in the dielectric values, with the addition of this specific nanocomposite in the material.

Keywords

Nanopolymer composites 3D printing Fused deposition modeling (FDM) Polylactic acid (PLA) PLA with graphene (PLA GnP) Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Dr. Mirella Suchea (IMT Bucharest) for the SEM support. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Shady F, Daniel GA, Langer R (2016) Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 107:367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ChacónJ M, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, Núñez PJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aliheidari N, Tripuraneni R, Ameli A, Nadimpalli S (2017) Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers. Polym Test 60:94e101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song Y, Li Y, Song W, Yee K, Lee K-Y, Tagarielli VL (2017) Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 123:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murariu M, Dubois P (2016) PLA composites: from production to properties. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 107:17–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Letcher T, Waytashek M (2014) Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. In: ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November 14–20Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang L, Gramlich WM, Gardner DJ (2017) Improving the impact strength of Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) in fused layer modeling (FLM). Polymer 114:242–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abbas TF, Othman FM, Ali HB (2018) Influence of layer thickness on impact property of 3D-printed PLA. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 5(2):1–4Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slapnik J, Bobovnik R, Mešl M, Bolka S (2016) Modified polylactide filaments for 3D printing with improved mechanical properties. Contemp Mater 2:142–150.  https://doi.org/10.7251/COMEN1602142S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tian X, Liu T, Wang Q, Dilmurat A, Li D, Ziegmann G (2017) Recycling and remanufacturing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. J Clean Prod 142(4):1609–1618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haq RHA, Rahman MNA, Ariffin AMT, Hassan MF, Yunos MZ, Adzila S (2017) Characterization and mechanical analysis of PCL/PLA composites for FDM feedstock filament. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/226/1/012038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perego G, Cella GD, Bastloll C (1996) Effect of molecular weight and crystallinity on poly(lactic acid) mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 59:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vian WD, Denton NL (2018) Hardness comparison of polymer specimens produced with different processes. Purdue University Press, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li H, Wu Z, Xue F, Bai J, Chu C (2018) Influence of equal channel angular pressing on the properties of polylactic acid. Polym Eng Sci 58:665–672.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ostafinska A, Fortelným I, Hodan J, Krejčíková S, Nevoralová M, Kredatusová J et al (2017) Strong synergistic effects in PLA/PCL blends: impact of PLA matrix viscosity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:229–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhuang Y, Song W, Ning G, Sun X, Sun Z, Xu G et al (2017) 3D-printing of materials with anisotropic heat distribution using conductive polylactic acid composites. Mater Des 126:135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang D, Chi B, Li B, Gao Z, Du Y, Guo J, Wei J (2016) Fabrication of highly conductive graphene flexible circuits by 3D printing. Synth Met 217:79–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bustillos J, Montero D, Nautiyal P, Loganathan A, Boesl B, Agarwal A (2017) Integration of graphene in poly(lactic) acid by 3D printing to develop creep and wear-resistant hierarchical nanocomposites. Polym Compos 39:3877–3888.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plymill A, Minneci R, Greeley DA, Gritton J, Greeley D (2016) Graphene and carbon nanotube PLA composite feedstock development for fused deposition modeling. University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1955
  20. 20.
    Prashantha K, Roger F (2017) Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem 54:24–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakatsuka T (2011) Polylactic acid-coated cable. Fujikura Tech Rev 40:39–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leigh SJ, Bradley RJ, Purssell CP, Billson DR, Hutchins DA (2012) A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS ONE 7(11):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zuza E, Ugartemendia JM, Lopez A, Meaurio E, Lejardi A, Sarasua J-R (2008) Glass transition behavior and dynamic fragility in polylactides containing mobile and rigid amorphous fractions. Polymer 49(20):4427–4432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kanchanasopa M, Runt J (2004) Broadband dielectric investigation of amorphous and semicrystalline L-lactide/meso-lactide copolymers. Macromolecules 37(3):863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren J, Adachi K (2003) Dielectric relaxation in blends of amorphous poly(DL-lactic acid) and semicrystalline poly(L-lactic acid). Macromolecules 36(14):5180–5186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Badia JD, Monreal L, De Juano-Arbona VS, Ribes-Greus A (2014) Dielectric spectroscopy of recycled polylactide. Polym Degrad Stab 107:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hikosaka S, Ishikawa H, Ohki Y (2011) Effects of crystallinity on dielectric properties of poly(L-lactide). Electron Commun Jpn 94(7):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Behzadnezhad B, Collick BD, Behdad N, McMillan AB (2018) Dielectric properties of 3D-printed materials for anatomy specific 3D-printed MRI coils. J Magn Reson 289:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huber E, Mirzaee M, Bjorgaard J, Hoyack M, Noghanian S, Chang I (2016) Dielectric property measurement of PLA. 978-1-4673-9985-2/16 2016 IEEEGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    HaydaleHDPlas® PLA-GNP-A (2017) Technical Data Sheet. http://www.haydale.com/
  31. 31.
    ASTM D790-10 Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materialsGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roark RJ (1954) Formulas for stress and strain, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM D6110-04 Standard test method for determining the Charpy impact resistance of notches specimens of plasticsGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tipler P (2004) Physics for scientists and engineers: mechanics, oscillations and waves, thermodynamics, 5th edn. W. H. Freeman, New York. ISBN 0-7167-0809-4Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Plane strain fracture toughness (kic) data handbook for metals army materials and mechanics research center ad-773 673Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roylance D (2001) Introduction to fracture mechanics, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MITGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentTechnological Education Institute of CreteHeraklionGreece
  2. 2.Electrical Engineering DepartmentTechnological Education Institute of CreteHeraklionGreece

Personalised recommendations