Advertisement

Thermoplastic composites between polybutylene succinate and recycled PET adding hollow glass microspheres

  • Nattakarn Hongsriphan
  • Kittin Borkaew
  • U-larak Peson
  • Watchara Pumpruck
Research Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Use of biodegradable polyester-based polymers in various applications has been extensively carried out in the past decades. Blending recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (r-PET) would be an alternative way to improve mechanical rigidity, reduce cost of the blends, and integrate recycle route with renewable resource. In this research, we attempted to prepare poly(butylene succinate) (PBS)/recycled PET (PBS/r-PET) blends via melt blending in various blend ratio (90:10, 80:20, and 70:30 wt%) and then melt compounded with hollow glass microspheres (HGM) (3, 5 and 10 wt%) to obtain thermoplastic composites that would be used in electrical or electronic applications. Mechanical properties of blends and their composites were evaluated by means of tensile and notched Izod impact tests. Compatibility and thermal behavior were characterized using DSC and TGA. Morphology of fractured specimens was studied using SEM. It was found that PBS/r-PET blends exhibited higher tensile modulus with respect to r-PET content; however, toughness of the blends was deteriorated from poor interfacial attraction and molecular weight reduction of PBS matrix. Tg of PBS phase was shifted to higher temperature because of transesterification. The composites had higher specific tensile modulus with respect to HGM loading. With the presence of r-PET, HGM surface was wetted implying r-PET acted as compatibilizer between hydrophobic PBS matrix and hydrophilic HGM, and thus, tensile modulus of composites was 10–40% increased depending on HGM loading.

Keywords

Poly(butylene succinate) Recycled PET Hollow glass microsphere Transesterification Specific modulus 

References

  1. 1.
    Gigli M, Fabbri M, Lotti N, Gamberini R, Rimini B, Munari A (2016) Poly(butylene succinate)-based polyesters for biomedical applications: a review. Eur Polym J 75:431–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jin F-L, Pang Q-Q, Zhang T-Y, Park S-J (2015) Synergistic reinforcing of poly(lactic acid)-based systems by polybutylene succinate and nano-calcium carbonate. J Ind Eng Chem 32:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uesaka T, Nakane K, Maeda S, Ogihara T, Ogata N (2000) Structure and physical properties of poly(butylene succinate)/cellulose acetate blends. Polymer 41(23):8449–8454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00206-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Homklin R, Hongsriphan N (2013) Mechanical and thermal properties of PLA/PBS co-continuous blends adding nucleating agent. Energy Procedia 34:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R-y Chen, Zou W, H-c Zhang, G-z Zhang, Z-t Yang, Jin G, J-p Qu (2015) Thermal behavior, dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties of poly(butylene succinate) composites filled with nanometer calcium carbonate. Polym Test 42:160–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frollini E, Bartoluccia N, Sisti L, Celli A (2015) Biocomposites based on poly(butylene succinate) and curaua: mechanical and morphological properties. Polym Test 45:168–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J, Luo X, Lin X (2013) Preparation and characterization of hollow glass microsphere reinforced poly(butylene succinate) composites. Mater Des 46:902–909.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ali FB, Mohan R (2009) Thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of biodegradable polybutylene succinate/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Polym Compos 31(8):1309–1314.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ren S, Liu J, Guo A, Zang W, Geng H, Tao X, Du H (2016) Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of a temperature resistance hollow glass microspheres/borosilicate glass buoyance material. Mater Sci Eng, A 674:604–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Welle F (2011) Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling: an overview. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(11):865–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    López MdMC, Pernas AIA, López JA, Latorre AL, Vilariño JML, Rodríguez VG (2014) Assessing changes on poly(ethylene terephthalate) properties after recycling: mechanical recycling in laboratory versus postconsumer recycled material. Mater Chem Phys 147(3):884–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bertin S, Robin J-J (2002) Study and characterization of virgin and recycled LDPE/PP blends. Eur Polym J 38(11):2255–2264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00111-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fraïsse F, Verney V, Commereuc S, Obadal M (2005) Recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends. Polym Degrad Stab 90(2):250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang H, Guo W, Yu Y, Li B, Wu C (2007) Structure and properties of compatibilized recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low density polyethylene blends. Eur Polym J 43(8):3662–3670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalfoglou NK, Skafidas DS, Kallitsis JK, Lambert J-C, Stappen LVd (1995) Comparison of compatibilizer effectiveness for PET/HDPE blends. Polymer 36(23):4453–4462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(95)96853-Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kráčalík M, Pospíšil L, Šlouf M, Mikešová J, Sikora A, Šimoník J, Fortelný I (2008) Effect of glass fibers on rheology, thermal and mechanical properties of recycled PET. Polym Compos 29(8):915–921.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giraldi ALFdM, Bartoli JR, Velasco JI, Mei LHI (2005) Glass fibre recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites: mechanical and thermal properties. Polym Test 24(4):507–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Calabia BP, Ninomiya F, Yagi H, Oishi A, Taguchi K, Kunioka M, Funabashi M (2013) Biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) composites reinforced by Cotton fiber with silane coupling agent. Polymers 5:128–141.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym5010128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen J, Wu D (2014) Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Poly(butylene succinate) blend: phase behavior and mechanical property control using its transesterification system as the compatibilizer. Mater Chem Phys 148:554–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rizzarelli P, Carroccio S (2009) Thermo-oxidative processes in biodegradable poly(butylene succinate). Polym Degrad Stab 94:1825–1838.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Georgousopoulou I-N, Vouyiouka S, Dole P, Papaspyrides CD (2016) Thermo-mechanical degradation and stabilization of poly(butylene succinate). Polym Degrad Stab 128:182–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial TechnologySilpakorn UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations